Clinical case
A 29-year-old G2P2 woman with a known bicornuate uterus presents to the office with irregular vaginal bleeding. A pelvic exam demonstrates a 2 cm friable lesion on the proximal vagina adjacent to the cervix ( Fig. 16.1 ). A biopsy is consistent with clear cell carcinoma of the vagina. An MRI shows no parametrial involvement or invasion into nearby structures, and a PET scan demonstrates no distant metastases. How do you proceed?
Epidemiology
Etiology and risk factors
The most well-established risk factor for clear cell carcinomas of the vagina and cervix is in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES). DES is a synthetic estrogen that is administered orally. Beginning in the late 1940s, physicians in the United States began prescribing DES as a means to decrease adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm delivery, recurrent pregnancy loss, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. It was prescribed most commonly between 1947 and 1971. In1970, the first case series of six women with clear cell carcinoma of the vagina was published. In 1971, a subsequent case control study showed an increased odds of having been exposed to DES in utero in the women with clear cell carcinoma compared with the control group. At this point, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) changed the label for DES to no longer include prevention of miscarriage, and added pregnancy as a contraindication. Use of DES during pregnancy declined significantly following.
In the Registry established to study these tumors, 695 women diagnosed with clear cell carcinoma of the vagina and cervix were reported, and 416 of these patients had known in utero exposure to DES. Because of its rarity, the exact quantification of increased odds of developing clear cell carcinomas of the vagina and cervix attributable to DES exposure is uncertain, but the majority of cases have been associated with in utero DES. However, the significant proportion of women in the Registry without a known in utero DES exposure implies that there are probably other mechanisms by which these clear cell carcinomas may develop. In a study using the Central Netherlands Registry, a similar proportion of women developed clear cell carcinomas of the vagina and cervix without having had in utero exposure to DES as compared with the United States registry.
Less is known about the relationship between clear cell carcinoma of the cervix or vagina and race and ethnicity. Only a small number of women in the United States registry were Black women (7%). A smaller proportion of Black women in the Registry had known DES exposure in utero, but this may have been due at least in part to decreased availability of maternal pregnancy histories compared with the white women included in the Registry.
Mullerian abnormalities also have been associated with clear cell carcinomas of the vagina and cervix. Some anomalies are related to DES exposure and abnormal Mullerian embryological development. Common anomalies include small, T-shaped uteri and abnormal appearing cervixes (cockscomb) and upper vaginas, which can be associated with infertility. However, non-DES-related anomalies have also been linked to clear cell carcinomas of the vagina and cervix, including Mullerian anomalies (bicornuate uterus, vaginal septum) and urinary tract abnormalities such as renal agenesis. Chromosomal abnormalities have also been linked to development of these rare cancers, as have endometriotic implants in the vagina and cervix which have undergone malignant transformation into clear cell carcinomas. Many cases are likely to be sporadic.
Incidence and mortality
After the association with DES was demonstrated, registries were established to follow women with known diagnoses of clear cell carcinoma arising in the vagina or cervix. Women were included regardless of their DES exposure status. Through these registries, more accurate risk estimates could be made. In women who had DES exposure in utero, the risk of developing clear cell carcinoma of the vagina or cervix by the age of 34 was estimated to be about 1 in 1000. Of the 720 women with clear cell carcinoma who were included in the Registry, 400 (56%) patients had vaginal cancer, 182 (25%) had cervical cancer, and 138 (19%) had cancer involving both the vagina and cervix. After the FDA listed pregnancy as a contraindication for the use of DES, the incidence of clear cell carcinoma of the vagina and cervix declined. However, it is estimated that approximately 50 cases each year are still diagnosed.
The mean age at diagnosis is 22 years old, and 80% of patients are diagnosed between the ages of 15 and 30. Survival outcomes are different for women exposed to DES in utero compared with those who were not exposed, likely due to differences in tumor biology. A bimodal age distribution of incidence, one peak centered around 20 years of age and one around 60–80 years of age, has been described for non-DES-exposed women. In 2018, updated survival data were published using the United States Registry. For DES-exposed women, the 5-year survival was slightly better at 86%, compared with 81% for those without exposures. The 20-year survival is approximately 69%, and was similar for both groups. However, given the rarity of vaginal and cervical clear cell carcinomas, it is possible that some number of the women who were considered unexposed actually did have exposure to DES in utero. This theory of possible DES exposure is supported by the similar age distributions in registry patients with clear cell carcinomas of the vagina or cervix who were and were not exposed. When looking at the evolution of overall survival over time, it is thought that an increase in deaths at age 35–49 is related to late recurrences of disease.
Pathology
Adenocarcinoma makes up approximately 10% of all primary vaginal carcinomas and it is more common to have metastasis or extension of tumor from uterus, cervix, or vulva. Clear cell carcinoma of the vagina is of particular interest, due to the known association with DES. The median age of diagnosis for DES-related clear cell carcinoma was 20 years, with 80% of cases between the age of 15 and 31, though they have also been reported up to age 55. Cases of clear cell carcinoma have also been reported to arise from vaginal adenosis without history of prenatal DES exposure and frequently occur in older women. Half of high grade primary vaginal adenocarcinomas may show clear cell differentiation. Primary vulvar clear cell carcinoma is extremely rare, and usually arises in association with vulvar endometriosis.
Gross description
Lesions can be more exophytic with polypoid, nodular or papillary appearance or may be flat or ulcerated.
Microscopic description
Clear cell carcinoma can have a variety of architectural patterns, including tubulocystic/glandular, papillary, and solid, and frequently show a mixture of patterns in a given tumor. The tumor cells have a varied appearance from flattened to polyhedral or cuboidal cells to “hobnail” cells with bulbous nuclei that protrude into a gland lumen or surface ( Fig. 16.2 ). Nuclear atypia is moderate to marked, though the mitotic count is usually discordant with the atypia and is often low (approximately 3–4 mitosis per 10 HPF). While the tumors typically have clear cytoplasm, sometimes it can be eosinophilic.
Immunohistochemistry
Clear cell carcinoma is typically positive for cytokeratin 7, PAX-8, HNF1-b, and Napsin, while negative or weakly positive for hormone receptors ER and PR ( Figs. 16.3–16.5 ). However, these markers are frequently not helpful in confirming the diagnosis. HNF1-b is not very specific and Napsin is not sensitive, hence negative staining for the latter does not exclude a diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma.
Differential diagnosis
Benign mimics may include vaginal adenosis or mesonephric remnants, though these would lack typical nuclear atypia of clear cell carcinoma.
The differential diagnosis includes endometrioid adenocarcinoma and serous carcinoma, both of which can show clear cell change. Endometrioid carcinoma is usually diffusely positive for hormone receptors while clear cell carcinoma is negative. In some cases, distinguishing serous carcinoma from clear cell carcinoma may not be possible as both can overexpress p53 and, as mentioned earlier, the clear cell markers may not be helpful.
Extragonadal yolk sac tumors (YSTs) can be difficult to distinguish by morphology, though typically displaying Schiller–Duval bodies (papillae with central blood vessels), elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and usually a more reticular morphology. Immunohistochemical stains help, as clear cell carcinoma will be CK7 and EMA positive, while negative in YSTs. SALL4, CDX2 and villin are expressed in most cases of YST and are usually negative in clear cell carcinoma. HNF1-b is positive in both and is not a useful distinguishing marker in this differential.
Molecular findings
Clear cell carcinomas associated with DES have genetic instability by mechanism of somatic mutations of microsatellite repeat sequences, which suggests that genes encoding DNA repair proteins may represent mutational targets of DES-induced mutagenesis. Non-DES vaginal clear cell carcinoma has been reported to harbor chromosomal imbalances, such as chromosomal gain at 20q and loss of heterozygosity at 9p along with PIK3CA mutation, which are also seen in ovarian clear cell carcinomas.
Diagnosis and workup
Signs and symptoms
Signs and symptoms may mirror those related to other vaginal and cervical cancers. Vaginal bleeding and discharge are both common presenting complaints, or patients may report bleeding after intercourse. Patients may also note a vaginal mass or nodule, and some girls/women reported changes in urinary symptoms.
Physical exam findings
Physical exam may reveal a mass in the vagina or on the cervix. Vaginal adenosis is known to be a precursor lesion, and these red, polypoid lesions may be visible prior to or identified concurrently with vaginal clear cell adenocarcinomas. Given the young age at presentation associated with DES-related clear cell carcinomas, gynecologic exams may be more difficult to perform. For both DES and non-DES-exposed cases, an association with Mullerian tract abnormalities has been identified. Patients may have a small or T-shaped uterus, or urinary tract abnormalities seen on imaging.
Differential diagnosis
The differential diagnosis for clear cell carcinomas should include other histologic subtypes of vaginal and cervical cancers, including squamous cell and other adenocarcinomas. Other benign causes of vaginal and cervical masses should be considered, including polyps, leiomyomas, and cysts. Complaints of vaginal discharge or abnormal bleeding could also be associated with infectious or traumatic etiologies.
Tumor markers
There are no known tumor markers for clear cell carcinoma of the vagina. There are reports of CA-125 correlating with disease burden. In the cases of malignant transformation of endometriotic lesions, it is also plausible that CA-125 levels may be elevated. However, we do not recommend tumor markers be routinely ordered during the diagnostic work-up of a vaginal or cervical clear cell carcinoma.
Imaging studies
In women with a new diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma of the vagina or cervix, we follow imaging guidelines similar to those recommended for new diagnoses of cervical cancer. Pelvic MRI can be useful to determine the extent of local disease. PET/CT or CT with contrast can be useful for evaluation of distant disease.
Diagnostic testing
Screening for women with a history of in utero DES exposure is discussed in the Special Considerations section. As is the case for cytologic abnormalities found on pap tests in other settings, colposcopy and colposcopic-guided biopsies are recommended in concordance with current lower genital tract screening and diagnostic guidelines.
For girls and women in whom a vaginal or cervical mass is identified, a tissue biopsy should be performed. For women and some girls who are comfortable with pelvic exams this may be achieved in the office. For girls or women in whom a pelvic examination may be more uncomfortable or difficult, examination with biopsies may need to be performed under anesthesia.
Staging system
Although historically cervical cancer was clinically staged, in 2018 the FIGO cervical cancer staging guidelines were updated ( Table 16.1 ). Use of pathology and imaging studies are now included to help determine the stage of disease. For vaginal cancer, the 2009 FIGO guidelines are frequently used in the United States ( Table 16.2 ). Similar to new cervical cancer diagnoses, we use a combination of imaging, pathology (biopsies or surgical resection), and clinical findings to determine the extent of disease and stage.
Stage | Description |
---|---|
I | The carcinoma is strictly confined to the cervix (extension to the uterine corpus should be disregarded) |
IA | Invasive carcinoma that can be diagnosed only by microscopy, with maximum depth of invasion < 5mm a |
IA1 | Measured stromal invasion ≤ 3 mm in depth |
IA2 | Measured stromal invasion > 3 mm and ≤ 5 mm in depth |
IB | Invasive carcinoma with measured deepest invasion > 5 mm (greater than Stage IA), lesion limited to the cervix uteri |
IB1 | Invasive carcinoma > 5 mm depth of stromal invasion, and ≤ 2 cm in greatest dimension |
IB2 | Invasive carcinoma > 2 cm and ≤ 4 cm in greatest dimension |
IB3 | Invasive carcinoma > 4 cm in greatest dimension |
II | The carcinoma invades beyond the uterus, but has not extended onto the lower third of the vagina or to the pelvic wall |
IIA | Involvement limited to the upper two-thirds of the vagina without parametrial involvement |
IIA1 | Invasive carcinoma ≤ 4 cm in greatest dimension |
IIA2 | Invasive carcinoma > 4 cm in greatest dimension |
IIB | With parametrial involvement but not up to the pelvic wall |
III | The carcinoma involves the lower third of the vagina and/or involves pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes b |
IIIA | The carcinoma involves the lower third of the vagina, with no extension to the pelvic wall |
IIIB | Extension to the pelvic wall and/or hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney (unless known to be due to another cause) |
IIIC | Involvement of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes (including micrometastases), irrespective of tumor size and extent (with r and p notations) b |
IIIC1 | Pelvic lymph node metastasis only |
IIIC2 | Para-aortic lymph node metastasis |
IV | The carcinoma has extended beyond the true pelvis or has involved (biopsy proven) the mucosa of the bladder or rectum. (A bullous edema, as such, does not permit a case to be allotted to Stage IV.) |
IVA | Spread to adjacent pelvic organs |
IVB | Spread to distant organs |
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging of cancer of the cervix uteri (2018). | |
When in doubt, the lower staging should be assigned. |