Association between parity and breastfeeding with maternal high blood pressure




Objective


The objective of this study was to determine how parity and breastfeeding were associated with maternal high blood pressure, and how age modifies this association.


Study Design


Baseline data for 74,785 women were sourced from the 45 and Up Study , Australia. These women were 45 years of age or older, had an intact uterus, and had not been diagnosed with high blood pressure before pregnancy. Odds ratios (ORs) and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between giving birth, breastfeeding, lifetime breastfeeding duration, and average breastfeeding per child with high blood pressure were estimated using logistic regression.


Results


The combination of parity and breastfeeding was associated with lower odds of having high blood pressure (adjusted OR, 0.89; 99% CI, 0.82–0.97; P < .001), compared with nulliparous women, whereas there was no significant difference between mothers who did not breastfeed and nulliparous women (adjusted OR, 1.06; 99% CI, 0.95–1.18; P = .20). Women who breastfed for longer than 6 months in their lifetime, or greater than 3 months per child, on average, had significantly lower odds of having high blood pressure when compared with parous women who never breastfed. The odds were lower with longer breastfeeding durations and were no longer significant in the majority of women over the age of 64 years.


Conclusion


Women should be encouraged to breastfeed for as long as possible and a woman’s breastfeeding history should be taken into account when assessing her likelihood of high blood pressure in later life.


Pregnancy and breastfeeding are associated with large changes to the female hormonal profile. A correlation between these events and a woman’s risk of cardiovascular disease has been reported since the 1950s with more recent large cohort studies showing breastfeeding is beneficial to maternal cardiovascular health.




For Editors’ Commentary, see Contents



Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death among women in developed countries. Hypertension is one of the most prevalent cardiovascular diseases and is a strong predictor of other cardiovascular diseases including atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Age is a powerful predictor of hypertension, with increasing age associated with increasing rates of hypertension in industrialized countries.


The association between pregnancy and hypertension in later life remains unclear. Early work within the field found an association between increasing number of pregnancies and lower odds of hypertension, whereas other studies have shown no association between parity and blood pressure. These studies had relatively small sample sizes in comparison to the large cohorts that have since been established.


Breastfeeding has been reported to confer many benefits upon the newborn, including reduced levels of childhood obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. More recent studies have found an association between breastfeeding and a lower risk of maternal hypertension. This was first reported in 2005 by the Korean Women’s Cohort (KWC) Study and has since been reported by the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Study, and the US Nurses’ Health Study II. No studies have examined whether the combined effect of parity and breastfeeding is associated with high blood pressure, and how age modifies the association between breastfeeding and high blood pressure.


The present study aimed to determine: (a) the association between the event of giving birth with high blood pressure in later life, using observational data from the 45 and Up Study , Australia, (b) whether the combination of giving birth and breastfeeding is associated with high blood pressure in later life, and (c) if the duration of breastfeeding was associated with high blood pressure in later life, and how this association is modified as women age.


Materials and Methods


This study obtained data from women participating in the 45 and Up Study , a large scale cohort study of 267,153 men and women aged 45 and over in New South Wales, Australia. Participants were randomly selected from the Australian Medicare Database, which provides near complete coverage of the population, and they were enrolled into the study by completing a baseline questionnaire (available at www.45andUp.org.au ) and providing a signed consent form. People aged 80 years and over, and residents of rural and remote areas were oversampled. Study recruitment commenced in 2006 and was completed in 2009. The methods for the 45 and Up Study have been described elsewhere. The 45 and Up Study received ethics approval from the University of NSW Human Ethics Committee, and the current study was approved by the University of Western Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee. Exposure-outcome relationships estimated from the 45 and Up Study data have been shown to be consistent with another large study of the same population, regardless of the underlying response rate or mode of questionnaire administration.


All of the data used in this study were acquired from the 45 and Up Study baseline questionnaire. Women were included in this study if: they were age 45 years or more; had never given birth or had given birth after 18 years of age and before 45 years of age; had not had a hysterectomy or both ovaries removed; and had responded “No” to the question “Has a doctor ever told you that you have: high blood pressure–when pregnant?” ( Figure 1 ).




FIGURE 1


Participants included in the study

Flow chart of participant inclusion.

Lupton. Parity, breastfeeding, and high blood pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.


Women were defined as having high blood pressure if they answered “Yes” to the question “In the last month have you been treated for: high blood pressure.” Women were excluded if: they answered “Yes” to the question “Has a doctor ever told you that you have: high blood pressure – when not pregnant?” and the “Age when condition was first found” was younger than, the age reported on the question “How old were you when you gave birth to your FIRST child?”; answered “Yes” to “Has a doctor ever told you that you have: high blood pressure – when not pregnant?”, but were not being treated for high blood pressure; they failed to provide an age of onset for high blood pressure; they provided invalid data for family history; or they provided invalid data for the number of children they had given birth to in their specified age range ( Figure 1 ). Classification of demographic and lifestyle characteristics have been described elsewhere.


Women were classified as never having given birth if they answered “0’ to the question “How many children have you given birth to?”, with the further instruction to “please include stillbirths but do not include miscarriages, please write ‘0’ if you have not had any children.” Total breastfeeding duration was obtained from the response to the question “For how many months, in total, have you breastfed?”. Average breastfeeding duration was obtained by dividing the total breastfeeding duration by the reported number of children for each woman.


Odds ratios (ORs) and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between giving birth, breastfeeding, lifetime breastfeeding duration, and average breastfeeding per child with high blood pressure were estimated using logistic regression. For the analysis of whether giving birth is associated with having high blood pressure, women who had never given birth were the reference group. Analysis of lifetime breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration included only women who had given birth, with women who had never breastfed as the reference group. Both crude and adjusted OR were calculated and descriptions refer to adjusted OR unless otherwise specified. OR were adjusted for demographic and lifestyle factors using the categories in Table 1 , with an additional category for missing values. There was a significant interaction between whether a woman breastfed and current age, with having high blood pressure. As a result, women were stratified according to current age and divided into 3 groups (45 to <54 years, 54 to <64 years, 64 years or older) when testing the association between lifetime breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration with high blood pressure status. All statistical tests were 2-sided, using a significance level of P < .01 to partially account for multiple testing issues. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software (version 20; SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL).



TABLE 1

Sociodemographic factors associated with past breastfeeding behavior

















































































































































































Characteristics Groups Cases a (% column) % BF a OR c (99% CI)
Current age, y 45 to <54 22,361 (35) 93 1.00
54 to <64 21,454 (33) 87 0.58 (0.53–0.64) d
64+ 20,384 (32) 87 0.60 (0.54–0.66) d
Country of origin Australia 48,291 (75) 90 1.00
Other 15,368 (24) 86 0.78 (0.72–0.84) d
Income <$30K 16,416 (26) 86 1.00
$30–$70K 15,984 (25) 90 1.29 (1.17–1.42) d
$70K+ 15,472 (24) 94 2.09 (1.86–2.35) d
Not disclosed 16,327 (25) 86 0.94 (0.86–1.02)
Family history of HBP No 31,098 (48) 89 1.00
Yes 33,101 (52) 89 1.01 (0.94–1.08)
BMI <25 29,344 (46) 90 1.00
25-30 18,868 (29) 89 0.88 (0.81–0.95) d
30+ 10,839 (17) 86 0.69 (0.63–0.75) d
Smoking status Never 41,733 (65) 90 1.00
Past 17,909 (28) 89 0.86 (0.80–0.93) d
Current 4272 (7) 83 0.57 (0.50–0.64) d
Alcohol (drinks/wk) <1 24,191 (38) 86 1.00
1-5 17,760 (28) 91 1.55 (1.42–1.69) d
6-10 12,990 (20) 91 1.52 (1.37–1.67) d
11+ 7963 (12) 90 1.36 (1.22–1.53) d
Physical activity Insufficient 19,792 (31) 87 1.00
Sufficient 44,407 (69) 90 1.19 (1.11–1.28) d
Oral contraceptive use Never 11,277 (18) 87 1.00
Ever 51,964 (81) 90 1.02 (0.93–1.12)
HRT use Never 44,261 (69) 90 1.00
Ever 18,674 (29) 87 0.93 (0.87–1.01)
Number of children 1 6908 (11) 79 1.00
2 26,371 (41) 88 1.90 (1.73–2.09) d
3 19,078 (30) 92 2.94 (2.65–3.27) d
4+ 11,842 (18) 92 3.66 (3.24–4.13) d

BF , breastfed; BMI , body mass index; CI , confidence interval; HBP , high blood pressure; HRT , hormone replacement therapy; OR , odds ratio.

b The percentage of women who responded yes to having breastfed;

Lupton. Parity, breastfeeding, and high blood pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.

a Percentages do not consistently total to 100% because of missing values;


c Analysis adjusted for current age, country of origin, income level, family history of HBP, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, oral contraceptive use, HRT use, and number of children;


d P < .01.





Results


A total of 74,785 women aged 45 and over were included in the analysis of which 64,199 gave birth (85.8%), and 12,456 (16.7%) reported current treatment for high blood pressure. Of the women who had given birth, 57,097 (88.9%) reported they had breastfed, with the youngest women in the cohort (45 to <54 year olds) having the highest prevalence of breastfeeding (92.7%) ( Figure 1 ).


Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of women who had given birth are shown in Table 1 . Women who were born in Australia, had an income greater than $30,000, consumed greater than 1 alcoholic drink per week, never smoked, had sufficient physical activity levels and had a current body mass index (BMI) of less than 25, had higher odds of having breastfed. Increasing number of children was also associated with increased odds of having breastfed.


There was an association between parity and high blood pressure, with women who had given birth having significantly lower odds of high blood pressure when compared with women who had never given birth (adjusted OR, 0.91; 99% CI, 0.84–0.99; P = .004). Further analysis, stratifying mothers according to whether they had breastfed, found mothers who breastfed had significantly lower odds of having high blood pressure, compared with women who had never given birth (adjusted OR, 0.89; 99% CI, 0.82–0.97; P < .001), whereas the odds of having high blood pressure for mothers who did not breastfeed were not significantly different from women who had never given birth (adjusted OR, 1.06; 99% CI, 0.95–1.18; P = .195) ( Table 2 ).


May 13, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Association between parity and breastfeeding with maternal high blood pressure

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access