Association between maternal body mass index and congenital heart defects in offspring: a systematic review




The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between maternal body mass index and all congenital heart defects (CHDs) combined and 11 individual defects. PubMed, ELSEVIER ScienceDirect, and Springer Link (up to February 2013) were searched, and the reference list of retrieved articles was reviewed. Three authors independently extracted the data. The systematic review included 24 studies, 14 of which were included in a metaanalysis. Statistical software was used to perform all statistical analyses. Fixed-effects or random-effects model was used to pool the results of individual study (expressed as odds ratios [ORs] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]). A dose-response effect was observed between overweight, moderate obesity, and severe obesity and a pregnancy with any CHD (the pooled ORs: OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02–1.15]; OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.11–1.20]; and OR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.31–1.47], respectively) as well as some individual defects such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome, pulmonary valve stenosis, and outflow tract defects. When we excluded mothers with diabetes mellitus, the pooled ORs for all CHDs combined were 1.12 (95% CI, 1.04–1.20) and 1.38 (95% CI, 1.20–1.59) for moderately obese and severely obese, respectively. The highest increased risk was severely obese mothers for tetralogy of Fallot (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.49–2.51). Being underweight did not increase the risk of any of the aforementioned CHDs but did increase the risk of aortic valve stenosis (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.01–2.15]). The results of our study showed that increasing maternal body mass index was associated with an increasing risk of CHDs; severe obesity was an even greater risk factor for the development of CHDs.


Obesity among the general population has increased dramatically over the past decades, especially in the western world and in urbanized developing countries, and represents a worldwide public health concern. Even more compelling is the increasing prevalence of obesity among reproductive-aged women. Epidemiologic data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey described that, from 2007-2008, 28-32% of childbearing-aged women were obese and that 7.2-8.4% of them were morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI], ≥40 kg/m 2 ). From a public health perspective, recent studies have highlighted the increased risks that are associated with obesity in pregnancy and have appealed for optimal treatment of the pregravid obese women. Numerous studies have shown that obese women appear to be at a higher risk of pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm delivery, and cesarean delivery, as well as adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes, such as congenital heart defects (CHDs), neural tube defects, and orofacial clefts.


Among the aforementioned birth defects, CHD is a serious medical problem. The reported prevalence of CHDs among live births ranges from 0.4–1.0%, with regional variations. Approximately 25,000-35,000 infants in the United States are affected by CHDs each year. CHDs are among the most common birth defects and accounts for nearly one-third of all major congenital anomalies, substantially contributing to death during infancy and childhood, especially in the first year of life. But, the exact cause of CHDs is largely unknown. Studies have suggested that overweight/obesity is likely a major contributor to the increased incidence of CHDs. However, because of the limitations of sample size and epidemiologic study methods (ie, the lack of large birth cohort studies), the findings have been inconsistent. To assess and quantify the association between maternal BMI and the risk of a pregnancy with CHD, we conducted the systematic review and metaanalysis, using the currently available observational studies.


Materials and methods


Literature search and selection of studies


We carried out a comprehensive computerized search of Pubmed (January 1953 to February 2013), ELSEVIER ScienceDirect (SDOS; January 1953 to February 2013), and Springer Link (1996 to February 2013) using the search strategy: “(birth defects OR congenital malformations OR CHDs) AND (underweight OR overweight OR high weight OR obes* OR BMI OR maternal weight) AND (*pregnancy)”. Additional articles were identified by reviewing reference lists of articles. All searches were restricted to existing English-language articles.


Potentially eligible articles were identified according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) original epidemiologic studies only; (2) participants were pregnant women; (3) a measured or estimated prepregnancy or early pregnancy weight was reported; and (4) the outcome was pregnancies with all CHDs combined or any specific defect. Studies included in the metaanalysis were (1) reported BMI category in the standard format (kilograms per square meter), (2) reported odds ratios (ORs) accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or had sufficient raw data to calculate, and (3) had a reference group of normal-weight, no inclusion of underweight in the reference category. In the case of multiple publications that resulted from the same data, only the study that contained the most comprehensive information or the most recent study was selected. Disagreements regarding criteria fulfillment were resolved by discussion among the 3 researchers.


Data extraction and outcomes


Two reviewers (C.G. and S.X.) first screened studies by title/abstract and made exclusions based on the original eligibility criteria. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed independently by 3 authors (G.C, X.S. and L.Z.) using a piloted data extraction form. The retrieved information included study characteristics (ie, first author, publication year, study period, location, study design), participant information (ie, whether mothers had preexisting diabetes mellitus [PDM] or gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM]), sources and categorizations of maternal BMI/weight, sources and ascertainment of cases, and confounder-adjusted or unadjusted ORs and 95% CIs. Discrepancies among the 3 reviewers were resolved by discussion.


We conducted metaanalyses for all CHDs combined and 11 specific defects on the condition that there were at least 2 studies with available data. The 11 individual defects were atrial septal defect (ASD), aortic valve stenosis (AVS), atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD), conotruncal defects (CD), coarctation of the aorta (COA), hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), outflow tract defects (OTD), pulmonary valve stenosis (PVS), transposition of the great arteries (TGA), tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), and ventricular septal defect (VSD).


Statistical analysis


Different thresholds for categorizing maternal BMI have been used in different studies, making it difficult to compare risk estimates. In the metaanalysis, we categorized maternal BMI into 5 levels that are most consistent with the World Health Organization guidelines and are used most commonly in studies. Women with a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 were defined as normal weight (reference group): underweight, <18.5 kg/m 2 ; overweight, 25.0-29.9 kg/m 2 ; moderately obese, 30.1-34.9 or 30.1-39.9 kg/m 2 ; and severely obese, ≥35.0 or ≥40.0 kg/m 2 (either-or, consistent with the original studies). The latter 2 categories were combined in a group of ‘obese’ (≥30.0 kg/m 2 ; Table 1 ).



Table 1

Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and metaanalysis






































































































































































































































Study Location (period) Source and types of cases When diagnosed/diagnostic methods Measure of maternal weight PDM/GDM Definition of BMI, kg/m 2 CHDs and subtypes: no. of cases/no. used in metaanalysis
Oddy et al, 2009 Australia (1997-2000) a From Western Australian Birth Defects Registry (live births, stillbirths, terminations) 4 mo after birth or termination/by echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, surgery, or autopsy Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Not specified Underweight: <20.0; reference: 20.0-25.0; overweight: 25.0-30.0; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 111/95; CD: 38/31
Waller et al, 1994 United States (1985-1987) a Infants, fetuses, stillbirths Early/later in pregnancy or at delivery/ by ultrasonography or amniocentesis Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Included PDM and GDM Underweight: ≤18.0; reference: 19.0-27.0; overweight: 28.0-30.0; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 81/81; SD: 33/33
Gilboa et al, 2010 United States (1997-2004) a From NBDPS, a population-based study comprising data collected by 10 birth defects surveillance systems throughout the United States (live births, stillbirths, terminations) By echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, surgery, or autopsy Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Excluded PDM, included GDM Underweight: <18.5; reference: 18.5-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; moderately obese: 30.0-34.9; severely obese: ≥35.0 obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 4207/3991; EBS: 56; CD: 894/847; OTD: 1356/1303 b ; HLHS: 268/258; PA: 83; SV: 174; TOF: 447/429; TGA: 314/297; APVR: 261/247 c ; COA: 257/248; AVS: 154/143; PVS: 495/481; VSD: 875/820; ASD: 823/774; AVSD: 81/78; SD: 1728/1623; COA + VSD: 114; VSD + ASD: 346; PVS + ASD: 88
Baardman et al, 2012 The Netherlands (1997-2008) a From Eurocat Northern Netherlands, a population-based birth defects registry (live births, stillbirths, terminations) By a prenatal or postnatal echocardiogram, surgery, or autopsy Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Excluded PDM, included GDM Underweight: <18.5; reference: 18.5-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 797/797; CD: 115/115; SD: 349/349; OTD: 265/265
Mills et al, 2010 United States (1993-2003) a From the New York State Congenital Malformations Registry (live-born infants) Not specified Prepregnancy weight (obtained from birth certificates) Excluded PDM and GDM Underweight <19.0; reference: 19.0-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; moderately obese: 30.0-39.9; severely obese: ≥40.0; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 7392/6823; HLHS: 196/183; CD: 880/807; TOF: 409/381; TGA: 291/260; COA: 364/338; DORV: 96; PVS: 798/737; OTD: 1748/719 b ; APVR: 202/184 c ; AVS: 206/184; SD: 4744/4380; VSD: 3521/3246; ASD: 1744/1613; AVSD: 106/99.
Cedergren and Källén, 2003 Sweden (1992-2001) a From Swedish Medical Birth Registry, Registry of Congenital Malformations and Child Cardiology Register (newborn infants, infants) By pediatric neonatal examination, echocardiography, catheterization, operation, or autopsy Early pregnancy weight (measured at the first antenatal visit) Excluded PDM, included GDM Underweight: <19.8; reference: 19.8-26.0; overweight: 26.1-29.0; moderately obese: 29.1-35.0; severely obese: ≥35.0 obese: ≥29.0 All CHDs combined: 7535/6174; HLHS: 166/153; TOF: 223/195; TGA: 164/154; COA: 117/107; VSD: 2676/2428; ASD: 639/585; AVSD (ECD): 905/827
Khalil et al, 2008 Saudi Arabia, Riyadh (1998-2005) a From King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (infants) Clinical assessment, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and cardiac surgery Prepregnancy weight (obtained from registry data) Excluded PDM and GDM Reference: 19.0-25.0; overweight: 25.0-29.9; moderately obese: 30.0-35.0; severely obese: ≥35.0 obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 214/214; ASD: 31; VSD: 38; PA: 2; PDA: 18; AVS: 7; PVS: 14; COA: 5; TOF: 4; TGA: 5; complete heart block: 7; EBS: 1; ASD + VSD: 23; hypoplastic right heart: 5; ASD + PDA: 25; VSD + ASD + PDA: 8; ASD + AS: 2 d
Watkins et al, 2003 United States (1993-1997) a From Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (live births, stillbirths, terminations at ≥20 weeks’ gestation) At pediatric referral hospitals, cytogenetics laboratorial, or a clinic that specializes in pediatric cardiology Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Excluded PDM, GDM not specified Underweight: <18.5; reference: 18.5-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 195/175; LVOTD: 42/39; HLHS: 22/21; COA: 12/12; RVOTD: 25/21; ASD: 12/9; VSD: 43/40; TOF: 19/17; TGA: 25/21; OTD: 50/44
Watkins and Botto, 2001 United States (1968-1980) a From Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (live births, stillbirths) During the first year of life/at birthing hospitals, pediatric and specialty wards, and cytogenetic laboratories Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Excluded PDM and GDM Underweight: <19.8; reference: 19.9-22.7; overweight: 26.1-29.0; obese: ≥29.0 (for all cardiovascular anomalies) or ≥26 (for named subtypes) All CHDs combined: 851/408; OTD: 132/69; TOF: 45/24; TGA: 60/29; SD: 221/96; VSD: 195/87; ASD: 26/9
Martinez-Frias et al, 2005 Spain (1976-2001) a From the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (newborn infants) During the first 3 days of life/by physicians Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Excluded PDM and GDM Underweight: ≤20.9; reference: 21.0-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 764/565
Madsen et al, 2012 United States (1992-2007) a From Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System in Washington state (singleton live births) Within 3 years of birth/by echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, or surgery Prepregnancy weight (gathered from maternal prenatal record, hospital/clinic medical record, or self-reported) Excluded PDM, included GDM Underweight: <18.5; reference: 18.5-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; moderately obese: 30.0-34.9; severely obese: ≥35.0 obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 11263/7242; ASD: 1690/1690; VSD: 2915/2915; AVSD (ECD): 120/120; COA: 350/350; HLHS: 174/174; TGA: 177/177; TOF: 377/377; PVS: 621; LVOTD: 247; PA: 626; obstructive anomalies: 25; DORV: 85; EBS: 68; SV: 30; coronary artery anomaly: 30; APVR: 89; PDA: 2218 d
Waller et al, 2007 United States (1997-2002) a From NBDPS collected by 8 birth defects surveillance systems throughout the United States (liveborn infants) By echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, surgery, or autopsy Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Excluded PDM, included GDM Underweight: <18.5; reference: 18.5-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 4128/3873
Shaw and Carmichael, 2008 United States (1999-2004) a Live births, stillbirths, terminations Within 5 years of birth/by echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, surgery, or autopsy Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Excluded PDM and GDM Underweight: <18.5; reference: 18.5-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; obese: ≥30.0 TGA: 136/125; TOF: 165/140
Cedergren et al, 2002 Sweden (1982-1996) a From Swedish Child Cardiology Register (infants) Before the age of 1 year/by echocardiography, catheterization, operation, or autopsy Early pregnancy weight (measured at the first antenatal visit) Not specified Underweight: <19.8; reference: 19.8-25.9; overweight: 26.0-28.9; obese: ≥29.0 All CHDs combined: 231/181 (medical records study)
Cedergren et al, 2002 Sweden (1982-1996) e From Swedish medical health registers (infants) By pediatric neonatal examination Early pregnancy weight (measured at the first antenatal visit) Not specified Underweight: <19.8; reference: 19.8-25.9; overweight: 26.0-28.9; obese: ≥29.0 All CHDs combined: 2208; ASD: 157; VSD: 667; ECD: 29; SV: 32; TOF: 55; common truncus: 15; TGA: 65; HLHS: 33; PVS: 70; COA: 95; other and unspecified defects: 1306 d (register study)
Moore et al, 2000 United States (1984-1987) e From >100 obstetrics practices (live births, stillbirths, terminations) In second trimester of pregnancy/by amniocentesis or alpha-fetoprotein screening Weight 3 months before conception (by retrospective self-report) Excluded PDM and GDM Reference: <28.0; obese: ≥28.0 HLHS: 20; SD: 11 d
Mikhail et al, 2002 United States (1981-1994) e From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago (delivered babies, terminations) Not specified Prepregnancy weight Excluded PDM and GDM Reference: <27.0; obese: ≥27.0 All CHDs combined: 7; HLHS: 2; TOF: 2; TGA: 1; DORV: 1; cardiomegaly: 1 d
Richards, 1969 South Wales (1964-1966) a Not specified Not specified Retrospectively self-reported by mother and confirmed in medical records Not specified Not specified All cardiovascular defects: 100; SD: 21; PDA: 16; aortic anomalies: 29 f
Cedergren et al, 2002 Sweden (1973-1990) a From Swedish Medical Birth Registry (infants) By pediatric neonatal examination Early pregnancy weight (collected at the first antenatal visit) Not specified Reference: <29.0; obese: ≥29.0 All CHDs combined: 246 d
García-Patterson et al, 2004 Spain (1986-2002) e From Hospital of the Holy Cross and St Paul, Barcelona, Spain (newborn infants) Before hospital discharge or within the first weeks of life/by a neonatologist Prepregnancy weight All cases had GDM 1st tertile: 15.43-21.91; 2nd tertile: 21.92-24.77; 3rd tertile: 24.78-47.07 All CHDs combined: 29 g
Shaw et al, 2000 United States (study 2: 1987-1988) a From Californian counties (infants and fetal deaths at ≥20 weeks’ gestation) Diagnostic information collected from medical records from hospitals and genetics centers Prepregnancy weight (by retrospective self-report) Included PDM and/or GDM Reference: <29.0; obese: >29.0 CD: 202/461 d
Blomberg and Källén, 2010 Sweden (1995-2007) e From Swedish Medical Birth Registry, Registry of Congenital Malformations and Child Cardiology Register (newborn infants, infants) By pediatric neonatal examination, echocardiography, catheterization, operation, or autopsy Prepregnancy weight (obtained at the first antenatal visit) Included PDM and GDM Underweight: <18.5; reference: 18.5-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; moderately obese: 30.0-39.9; severely obese: ≥40.0 obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 11163; TOF: 444; TGA: 514; HLHS: 274; common truncus: 156 d
Cedergren and Källén, 2006 Sweden (1992-2001) e From Swedish Medical Birth Registry, Registry of Congenital Malformations and Child Cardiology Register (newborn infants, infants) By pediatric neonatal examination, echocardiography, catheterization, operation, or autopsy Early pregnancy weight (obtained from antenatal care documents) Excluded PDM, GDM not specified. Underweight: <20.0; reference: 20.0-24.9; overweight: 25.0-29.9; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 6346 h
Arias and Viner-Brown, 2010 United States (2007-2009) a From Women & Infants Hospital (Providence, RI) and Kent Hospital (Warwick, RI) (newborn infants) Not specified Prepregnancy weight (obtained from prenatal care documents) Included PDM, excluded GDM Reference: <30.0; obese: ≥30.0 All CHDs combined: 235; SD: 157; CD: 62; obstruction defects: 21 d

APVR, anomalous pulmonary venous return; ASD, atrial septal defect; AVS, aortic valve stenosis; AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect; BMI, body mass index; CD, conotruncal defect; CHD , congenital heart defect; COA, coarctation of the aorta; DORV, double outlet right ventricle; EBS, Ebstein’s anomaly; ECD, endocardial cushion defect; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome; LVOTD, left ventricular outflow tract defect; LVOTD, left ventricular outflow tract; NBDPS, National Birth Defects Prevention Study; OTD, outflow tract defect; PA, pulmonary atresia; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; PDM, preexisting diabetes mellitus; PVS, pulmonary valve stenosis; RVOTD, right ventricular outflow tract defect; SD, septal defect; SV, single ventricle; TGA, transposition of the great arteries; TOF, tetralogy of Fallot; VSD, ventricular septal defect.

Cai. Association maternal BMI and CHDs in offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .

a Refers to case control study


b Including left ventricular outflow tract defects and right ventricular outflow tract defects


c Including anomalous pulmonary venous return and complete/total anomalous pulmonary venous return


d Excluded from metaanalysis because odds ratios could not be calculated


e Refers to cohort study


f Excluded from metaanalysis because body mass index not specified


g Excluded from metaanalysis because body mass index not reported in standard format


h Excluded from metaanalysis because reported the same data as elsewhere.



The metaanalysis was conducted and reported according to the Statement of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We extracted data from each study and analyzed with the data with RevMan software (version 5.2; Cochrane Review Manager; Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Although several of the original studies presented adjusted ORs, the adjustment for potential confounding factors varied among studies, and no summary adjusted ORs could be calculated. Moreover, the crude and adjusted estimates in original studies were mostly similar. Therefore, we used only crude estimates in the metaanalysis.


Weight for each study (for dichotomous outcomes this weight was based on the size of the study and the number of events) was calculated to determine how much each individual study contributed to the pooled estimate. Heterogeneity was estimated by the chi-square test (considered to be an evidence of significant heterogeneity if P < .1) and the Cochrane Q test (quantified with the I 2 metric, which described the total variation in OR attributable to heterogeneity). I 2 = 0 indicates no heterogeneity; the larger value indicates the greater heterogeneity. As is typical in metaanalyses, I 2 also was used to select the most appropriate pooling method : fixed-effects models were used for I 2 ≤ 50%, and random-effects models were used for I 2 > 50%. Z-test was applied for testing the overall effect; a probability value of < .05 was considered statistically significant. Forest plots were constructed to present study-specific pooled ORs and 95% CIs graphically. The presence of publication bias was tested with the use of a combination of Egger’s regression asymmetry test and Begg’s rank correlation test (using Stata software, version 11.0; StataCorp, College Station, TX).


Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the overall findings for CHDs as a group: (1) fixed-effect models vs random-effect models; (2) cases ascertained among live births, stillbirths, and terminations vs live births and stillbirths vs only live-born infants or newborn infants; (3) <500 cases vs ≥500 cases; (4) excluded PDM but included GDM vs excluded both conditions; and (4) studies conducted in the United States vs in other countries ( Table 2 ).



Table 2

Sensitivity analysis for all congenital heart defects combined




































































































































































































































































































Body mass index categories and subgroups Included studies Odds ratio (95% CI) P value Pooling method
Underweight
Overall 0.99 (0.94–1.03) .56 Fixed
<500 cases 1.26 (0.94–1.70) .12 Fixed
>500 cases 0.98 (0.93–1.03) .40 Fixed
Excluded PDM, included GDM 0.97 (0.91–1.03) .36 Fixed
Excluded PDM and GDM 0.99 (0.92–1.07) .86 Fixed
From the United States 1.02 (0.96–1.08) .62 Fixed
From other countries 0.94 (0.88–1.02) .13 Fixed
Live births, stillbirths, terminations 0.98 (0.83–1.16) .81 Fixed
Liveborn infants or newborn infants 0.99 (0.94–1.04) .72 Fixed
Overweight
Overall 1.08 (1.02–1.15) .00 a Random
<500 cases 1.38 (1.10–1.74) .00 a Fixed
>500 cases 1.05 (1.01–1.08) .00 a Fixed
Excluded PDM, included GDM 1.06 (1.02–1.10) .00 a Fixed
Excluded PDM and GDM 1.13 (0.94–1.36) .20 Random
From the United States 1.11 (1.02–1.21) .02 b Random
From other countries 1.04 (0.97–1.11) .25 Fixed
Live births, stillbirths, terminations 1.20 (0.95–1.51) .13 Random
Liveborn infants or newborn infants 1.04 (1.00–1.07) .05 Fixed
Moderately obese
Overall 1.15 (1.09–1.21) .00 a Fixed
>500 cases 1.16 (1.11–1.21) .00 a Fixed
Excluded PDM, included GDM 1.17 (1.12–1.23) .00 a Fixed
Excluded PDM and GDM 1.12 (1.04–1.20) .00 a Fixed
From the United States 1.17 (1.12–1.23) .00 a Fixed
From other countries 0.99 (0.72–1.37) .96 Random
Liveborn infants or newborn infants 1.14 (1.07–1.22) .00 a Fixed
Severely obese
Overall 1.39 (1.31–1.47) .00 a Fixed
>500 cases 1.44 (1.34–1.54) .00 a Fixed
Excluded PDM, included GDM 1.46 (1.35–1.58) .00 a Fixed
Excluded PDM and GDM 1.38 (1.20–1.59) .00 a Fixed
From the United States 1.45 (1.34–1.57) .00 a Fixed
From other countries 1.39 (1.21–1.61) .00 a Fixed
Liveborn infants or newborn infants 1.38 (1.30–1.47) .00 a Fixed
Obese
Overall 1.23 (1.19–1.27) .00 a Fixed
<500 cases 1.26 (1.00–1.59) .05 Fixed
>500 cases 1.25 (1.17–1.34) .00 a Random
Excluded PDM, included GDM 1.28 (1.18–1.39) .00 a Random
Excluded PDM and GDM 1.16 (1.08–1.23) .00 a Fixed
From the United States 1.25 (1.20–1.30) .00 a Fixed
From other countries 1.16 (1.09–1.25) .00 a Fixed
Live births, stillbirths, terminations 1.31 (1.18–1.46) .00 a Fixed
Live births, stillbirths 1.29 (1.07–1.99) .04 b Fixed
Liveborn infants or newborn infants 1.22 (1.13–1.31) .00 a Random

CI , confidence interval; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PDM, preexisting diabetes mellitus.

Cai. Association maternal BMI and CHDs in offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .

a P < .01


b P < .05.





Results


Study identification and selection


As shown in Figure 1 , the primary search of Pubmed, SDOS, and Springer Link identified 5929 articles, 5863 of which were excluded based on the review of the title/abstract; further review of the reference lists of the 66 articles identified another 13 studies for possible inclusion. By reviewing the whole 79 articles according to the prespecified inclusion criteria, 56 articles were excluded. Therefore, 23 articles (which contained 24 eligible studies) were screened for final inclusion in the systematic review. As Table 1 shows, among the 24 studies, 18 (75%) were case-control studies, and 6 (25%) were cohort studies; 12 studies (50%) were conducted in the United States; 6 studies (25%) were conducted in Sweden, and the remaining 25% of studies were from another 5 countries; 7 studies were conducted for the primary purpose of investigating the association between maternal BMI and CHDs; and the remaining studies reported data regarding this relationship as a secondary aim.




Figure 1


Flow diagram

Flow diagram shows the process for retrieving studies from searches.

BMI , body mass index; OR , odds ratio; SDOS , ELSEVIER ScienceDirect.

Cai. Association maternal BMI and CHDs in offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .


Based on the inclusion criteria for the metaanalysis, 10 studies were excluded: 7 studies had unclear controls and ORs accompanying 95% CI could not be calculated; 1 study reported results that used the same population as another study; 1 study did not report BMI, and 1 study reported BMI in a nonstandard format. Thus, 14 studies were considered for the metaanalysis. Among them, 13 studies presented data for underweight and overweight women; 5 studies presented data for moderately obese and severely obese women, and 9 studies presented data for obese women as a single group, respectively, compared with normal-weight pregnant women.


Metaanalysis results


The quantitative findings are presented in Figure 2 and Table 3 . Overweight, moderately obese and severely obese pregnant women were at significantly increased odds of a pregnancy affected by any CHD (pooled ORs, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02–1.15], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.11–1.20], and 1.39 [95% CI, 1.31–1.47], respectively) as well as some individual defects such as HLHS, PVS, and OTD.




























Figure 2


Forest plot

Forest plot for congenital heart defects and 11 individual types.

CHD , congenital heart defect.

Cai. Association maternal BMI and CHDs in offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .


Table 3

Summary estimates of the metaanalysis
































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Congenital heart defects and subtypes Studies, n Cases, n Pooled odds ratio (95% CI) P value I 2 metric ( P value) Pooling method Change pooling method
Pooled odds ratio (95% CI) P value
All congenital heart defects combined
Underweight 10 20,100 0.99 (0.94–1.03) .56 29% (.18) Fixed 1.00 (0.94–1.06) .96
Overweight 11 24,719 1.08 (1.02–1.15) .00 a 52% (.02) Random 1.05 (1.02–1.09) .00 a
Moderately obese 5 18,146 1.15 (1.11–1.20) .00 a 35% (.19) Fixed 1.15 (1.09–1.21) .00 a
Severely obese 5 16,020 1.39 (1.31–1.47) .00 a 0% (.99) Fixed 1.39 (1.31–1.47) .00 a
Obese 13 23,948 1.23 (1.19–1.27) .00 a 49% (.02) Fixed 1.25 (1.17–1.33) .00 a
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome
Underweight 4 379 0.84 (0.60–1.18) .31 0% (.89) Fixed 0.84 (0.60–1.19) .33
Overweight 4 490 1.31 (1.08–1.59) .00 a 0% (.78) Fixed 1.31 (1.08–1.60) .00 a
Moderately obese 3 421 1.54 (1.21–1.94) .00 a 0% (.71) Fixed 1.54 (1.21–1.95) .00 a
Severely obese 3 361 1.56 (1.08–2.27) .02 b 0% (.54) Fixed 1.60 (1.10–2.31) .01 b
Obese 4 467 1.51 (1.23–1.86) .00 a 0% (.58) Fixed 1.52 (1.23–1.88) .00 a
Pulmonary valve stenosis
Underweight 2 710 0.82 (0.43–1.54) .53 57% (.04) Random 0.92 (0.73–1.18) .53
Overweight 2 957 1.26 (1.09–1.44) .00 a 23% (.25) Fixed 1.26 (1.08–1.48) .00 a
Moderately obese 2 821 1.33 (1.13–1.58) .00 a 4% (.31) Fixed 1.33 (1.12–1.58) .00 a
Severely obese 2 710 1.79 (1.39–2.30) .00 a 50% (.16) Fixed 1.75 (1.21–2.54) .00 a
Obese 2 896 1.44 (1.24–1.67) .00 a 0% (.73) Fixed 1.44 (1.24–1.67) .00 a
Outflow tract defect
Underweight 3 1645 1.08 (0.68–1.72) .75 60% (.00) Random 1.07 (0.92–1.26) .37
Overweight 3 2344 1.19 (1.09–1.31) .00 a 0% (.63) Fixed 1.19 (1.09–1.31) .00 a
Moderately obese 2 2026 1.39 (1.25–1.55) .00 a 11% (.29) Fixed 1.39 (1.23–1.56) .00 a
Severely obese 2 1708 1.36 (1.13–1.64) .00 a 0% (.67) Fixed 1.37 (1.14–1.64) .00 a
Obese 3 2206 1.39 (1.26–1.53) .00 a 0% (.44) Fixed 1.39 (1.26–1.54) .00 a
Atrial septal defect
Underweight 5 1983 1.11 (0.85–1.45) .45 57% (.05) Random 1.02 (0.89–1.17) .78
Overweight 4 2382 1.11 (0.94–1.31) .21 54% (.09) Random 1.07 (0.97–1.17) .18
Moderately obese 3 2167 1.26 (1.14–1.41) .00 a 0% (.64) Fixed 1.27 (1.14–1.41) .00 a
Severely obese 3 1880 1.67 (1.40–1.99) .00 a 50% (.16) Fixed 1.72 (1.35–2.20) .00 a
Obese 4 2328 1.35 (1.23–1.49) .00 a 28% (.24) Fixed 1.38 (1.21–1.57) .00 a
Tetralogy of Fallot
Underweight 6 697 0.99 (0.79–1.24) .93 0% (.53) Fixed 1.01 (0.80–1.27) .95
Overweight 5 948 1.15 (1.00–1.34) .05 16% (.31) Fixed 1.15 (0.97–1.36) .10
Moderately obese 3 703 1.14 (0.93–1.39) .20 0% (.79) Fixed 1.15 (0.94–1.40) .18
Severely obese 3 648 1.94 (1.49–2.51) .00 a 0% (.79) Fixed 1.95 (1.51–2.53) .00 a
Obese 5 887 1.28 (1.09–1.50) .00 a 12% (.34) Fixed 1.27 (1.06–1.52) .00 a
Conotruncal defect
Underweight 3 1078 1.06 (0.87–1.28) .58 0% (.79) Fixed 1.06 (0.87–1.28) .56
Overweight 3 1358 1.07 (0.95–1.21) .28 0% (.68) Fixed 1.07 (0.95–1.21) .27
Moderately obese 2 1152 1.12 (0.96–1.31) .14 0% (.67) Fixed 1.12 (0.96–1.31) .14
Severely obese 2 1031 1.49 (1.19–1.86) .00 a 2% (.31) Fixed 1.50 (1.20–1.88) .00 a
Obese 3 1278 1.22 (1.07–1.40) .00 a 0% (.44) Fixed 1.23 (1.08–1.40) .00 a
Atrioventricular septal defect
Underweight 3 807 0.83 (0.66–1.03) .09 0% (.86) Fixed 0.83 (0.66–1.03) .10
Overweight 3 862 0.89 (0.75–1.07) .22 0% (.49) Fixed 0.90 (0.75–1.07) .24
Moderately obese 3 824 1.03 (0.84–1.26) .78 0% (.38) Fixed 1.04 (0.85–1.28) .71
Severely obese 3 756 1.43 (1.03–2.00) .03 b 0% (.85) Fixed 1.44 (1.03–2.01) .03 b
Obese 3 861 1.11 (0.93–1.33) .25 0% (.74) Fixed 1.11 (0.93–1.33) .24
Ventricular septal defect
Underweight 5 4936 0.98 (0.90–1.07) .65 0% (.43) Fixed 0.98 (0.90–1.07) .67
Overweight 4 5509 0.98 (0.92–1.05) .63 31% (.22) Fixed 1.00 (0.91–1.09) .96
Moderately obese 3 4972 1.01 (0.93–1.09) .82 42% (.18) Fixed 1.01 (0.90–1.13) .84
Severely obese 3 4409 1.23 (1.07–1.41) .00 a 0% (.95) Fixed 1.23 (1.07–1.41) .00 a
Obese 4 5230 1.04 (0.97–1.12) .26 47% (.13) Fixed 1.03 (0.90–1.17) .71
Aortic valve stenosis
Underweight 2 215 1.47 (1.01–2.15) .04 b 0% (.37) Fixed 1.49 (1.02–2.17) .04 b
Overweight 2 254 0.99 (0.75–1.30) .93 22% (.26) Fixed 0.99 (0.72–1.35) .94
Moderately obese 2 243 1.48 (0.78–2.81) .24 56% (.04) Random 1.58 (1.17–2.11) .00 a
Severely obese 2 194 0.98 (0.20–4.86) .98 55% (.01) Random 0.94 (0.52–1.69) .83
Obese 2 255 1.30 (0.54–3.14) .56 59% (.03) Random 1.42 (1.08–1.86) .01 b
Coarctation of the aorta
Underweight 4 449 0.86 (0.63–1.17) .34 0% (.77) Fixed 0.87 (0.64–1.19) .38
Overweight 4 575 1.17 (0.98–1.40) .09 30% (.23) Fixed 1.21 (0.95–1.54) .12
Moderately obese 3 502 1.29 (1.03–1.60) .03 b 0% (.92) Fixed 1.29 (1.03–1.60) .02 b
Severely obese 3 424 1.04 (0.69–1.56) .86 17% (.30) Fixed 1.10 (0.70–1.74) .68
Obese 4 534 1.24 (1.01–1.51) .04 b 0% (.88) Fixed 1.25 (1.02–1.52) .03 b
Transposition of the great arteries
Underweight 6 653 0.90 (0.61–1.32) .59 51% (.07) Random 0.92 (0.72–1.17) .48
Overweight 5 724 0.92 (0.77–1.10) .36 0% (.66) Fixed 0.92 (0.78–1.10) .38
Moderately obese 3 543 1.01 (0.80–1.27) .94 47% (.06) Fixed 1.04 (0.75–1.44) .80
Severely obese 3 485 1.19 (0.63–2.26) .59 54% (.06) Random 1.03 (0.70–1.51) .88
Obese 5 678 0.99 (0.81–1.20) .89 35% (.19) Fixed 1.01 (0.78–1.31) .93

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 10, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Association between maternal body mass index and congenital heart defects in offspring: a systematic review

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access