Robboy SJ, Taguchi O, Cunha GR. Normal development of the human female reproductive tract and alterations resulting from experimental exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Hum Pathol. 1982;13:191–8.

Gordts S, Brosens JJ, Fusi L, Benagiano G, Brosens I. Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:244–8.PubMed

Larsen SB, Lundorf E, Forman A, Dueholm M. Adenomyosis and junctional zone changes in patients with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157:206–11.PubMed

Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:588–94.PubMed

Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Panazza S, Chatenoud L, Oldani S, Crosignani PG. Risk factors for adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1275–9.PubMed

Thomas Jr JS, Clark JF. Adenomyosis: a retrospective view. J Natl Med Assoc. 1989;81:969–72.PubMedCentralPubMed

Brown HK, Stoll BS, Nicosia SV. Uterine junctional zone: correlation between histologic findings and MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;179:409–13.PubMed

McCarthy S, Scott G, Majumdar S, Shapiro B, Thompson S, Lange R, et al. Uterine junctional zone: MR study of water content and relaxation properties. Radiology. 1989;171:241–3.PubMed

Campbell S, Young A, Stewart CJR, Aplin JD, Church HJ, Cameron IT. Laminin β2 distinguishes inner and outer layers of the human myometrium. J Reprod Fertil Abstr Ser. 1998;22:12.

Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Wang L. Imaging features of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:337–49.PubMed

Hauth EA, Jaeger HJ, Libera H, Lange S, Forsting M. MR imaging of the uterus and cervix in healthy women: determination of normal values. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:734–42.PubMed

Kunz G, Leyendecker G. Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle: characterization, regulation, function and dysfunction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4 Suppl 3:5–9.PubMed

Kunz G, Bell D, Deininger H, Wildt L, Leyendecker G. The dynamics of rapid sperm transport through the female genital tract. Evidence from vaginal sonography of uterine peristalsis (VSUP) and hysterosalpingoscintigraphy (HSSG). Hum Reprod. 1996;11:627–32.PubMed

Noe N, Kunz G, Herbertz M, Mall G, Leyendecker G. The cyclic pattern of the immunocytochemical expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in human myometrial and endometrial layers: characterization of the endometrial-subendometrial unit. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:190–7.PubMed

Quinn M. Uterine innervation in adenomyosis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:287–91.PubMed

Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2427–33.PubMed

Meredith SM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:107 e1–6.PubMed

Ferenczy A. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:312–22.PubMed

Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A, Szabolcs B, Romanini ME, Zupi E, et al. Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:471–9.PubMed

Sun YL, Wang CB, Lee CY, Wun TH, Lin P, Lin YH, et al. Transvaginal sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis based on histopathologic correlation. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;49:40–4.PubMed

Abdel-Gadir A, Oyawoye OO, Chander BP. Luteal phase transvaginal scan examinations have better diagnostic potential for showing focal subendometrial adenomyosis. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9:43–6.

Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1374–84.PubMed

Vercellini P, Parazzini F, Oldani S, Panazza S, Bramante T, Crosignani PG. Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: a study on frequency distribution and patient characteristics. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1160–2.PubMed

Vavilis D, Agorastos T, Tzafetas J, Loufopoulos A, Vakiani M, Constantinidis T, et al. Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: prevalence and relationship to operative findings and reproductive and menstrual factors. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1997;24:36–8.PubMed

Levgur M, Abadi MA, Tucker A. Adenomyosis: symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:688–91.PubMed

Azziz R. Adenomyosis in pregnancy. A review. J Reprod Med. 1986;31:224–7.PubMed

Merrill JA, Creasman WT. Disorders of the uterine corpus. In: Scott JR, Disaia PJ, Hammond CB, Spellacy WN, editors. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology. 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1990. p. 1023.

Ostrzenski A. Extensive iatrogenic adenomyosis after laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:143–5.PubMed

Israel SL, WouterszTB. Adenomyosis; a neglected diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1959;14(2):168–73.

Panganamamula UR, Harmanli OH, Isik-Akbay EF, Grotegut CA, Dandolu V, Gaughan JP. Is prior uterine surgery a risk factor for adenomyosis? Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1034–8.PubMed

Bergholt T, Eriksen L, Berendt N, Jacobsen M, Hertz JB. Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2418–21.PubMed

Curtis KM, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Peterson HB. Disruption of the endometrial-myometrial border during pregnancy as a risk factor for adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:543–4.PubMed

Barton JW, McCarthy SM, Kohorn EI, Scoutt LM, Lange RC. Pelvic MR imaging findings in gestational trophoblastic disease, incomplete abortion, and ectopic pregnancy: are they specific? Radiology. 1993;190:163–8.

Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Simon JA. Familial adenomyosis: a case report. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:1165–7.PubMed

Whitted R, Abadi MA, Voigl B, Mendez L. Does cesarean delivery increase the prevalence of adenomyosis? A retrospective review. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:S83.

Harris WJ, Daniell JF, Baxter JW. Prior cesarean section. A risk factor for adenomyosis? J Reprod Med. 1985;30:173–5.PubMed

Brosens I, Brosens JJ, Benagiano G. The eutopic endometrium in endometriosis: are the changes of clinical significance? Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:496–502.PubMed

Benagiano G, Brosens I, Habiba M. Structural and molecular features of the endomyometrium in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:386–402.PubMed

Gaetje R, Kotzian S, Herrmann G, Baumann R, Starzinski-Powitz A. Invasiveness of endometriotic cells in vitro. Lancet. 1995;346:1463–4.PubMed

Gaetje R, Kotzian S, Herrmann G, Baumann R, Starzinski-Powitz A. Nonmalignant epithelial cells, potentially invasive in human endometriosis, lack the tumor suppressor molecule E-cadherin. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:461–7.PubMedCentralPubMed

Devlieger R, D’Hooghe T, Timmerman D. Uterine adenomyosis in the infertility clinic. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:139–47.PubMed

Uduwela AS, Perera MA, Aiqing L, Fraser IS. Endometrial-myometrial interface: relationship to adenomyosis and changes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000;55:390–400.PubMed

Chiquet-Ehrismann R, Kalla P, Pearson CA. Participation of tenascin and transforming growth factor-beta in reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions of MCF7 cells and fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 1989;49:4322–5.PubMed

Mehasseb MK, Taylor AH, Pringle JH, Bell SC, Habiba M. Enhanced invasion of stromal cells from adenomyosis in a three-dimensional coculture model is augmented by the presence of myocytes from affected uteri. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2547–51.PubMed

Taylor AH, Kalathy V, Habiba M. Estradiol and tamoxifen enhance invasion of endometrial stromal cells in a three-dimensional coculture model of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:288–93.PubMed

Sahin AA, Silva EG, Landon G, Ordonez NG, Gershenson DM. Endometrial tissue in myometrial vessels not associated with menstruation. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1989;8:139–46.PubMed

Sieinski W. Tumor-like intravascular proliferations of the stroma in adenomyosis. Patol Pol. 1993;44:1–4.PubMed