Recurrent Early Pregnancy Loss



Fig. 15.1
Workup for early RPL . This figure outlines an algorithm for the full workup of early RPL. Arrows are provided that guide the reader through various outcomes possible during the RPL evaluation and appropriate “next steps” in diagnostic and therapeutic management



A302653_3_En_15_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 15.2
Initial evaluation for Early RPL. This figure outlines an algorithm for the initial evaluation of early RPL. Arrows are provided that guide the reader through various outcomes possible during the RPL evaluation and appropriate “next steps” in diagnostic management




15.3 Definition of Pregnancy Loss


The traditional definition of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) included those couples with three or more spontaneous, consecutive pregnancy losses. Ectopic and molar pregnancies are not included. The ASRM has defined RPL as “a distinct disorder defined by 2 or more failed clinical pregnancies” [6, 7]. For purposes of determining if an evaluation for RPL is appropriate, pregnancy “is defined as a clinical pregnancy documented by ultrasonography or histopathological examination” [6, 7]. Several studies have recently indicated that the risk of recurrent miscarriage after two successive losses is similar to the risk of miscarriage in women after three successive losses; thus, it is reasonable to start an evaluation after two or more consecutive spontaneous miscarriages to determine the etiology of their pregnancy loss, especially when the woman is older than 35 years of age, or when the couple has had difficulty conceiving [8].

Those couples with primary recurrent pregnancy loss have never had a previous viable infant, while those with secondary recurrent loss have previously delivered a pregnancy beyond 20 weeks and then suffered subsequent losses. Tertiary recurrent loss refers to those women who have multiple miscarriages interspersed with normal pregnancies.


15.4 Recurrence Risk


The main concerns of couples with recurrent miscarriage when they present to our Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Center are to find the cause and to establish the risk of recurrence. In a first pregnancy, the overall risk of loss of a clinically recognized pregnancy loss is 15% [9, 10]. The true risk of early pregnancy loss, however, is estimated to be around 50% because of the high rate of losses that occur before the first missed menstrual period [11]. Furthermore, as women age, this rate likely rises due to chromosomal errors introduced through meiotic nondisjunction errors during oocyte maturation. Studies that evaluated the frequency of pregnancy loss, based on highly sensitive tests for quantitative hCG, indicated that the total clinical and preclinical losses in women aged 20–30 is approximately 25%, while the loss rate in women aged 40 or more is at least double that figure [911]. The ability to predict the risk of recurrence is influenced by several factors including maternal age, parental and fetal karyotypes, the gestational age at which prior losses occurred, and the presence of various maternal laboratory findings [9, 1217].


15.5 Etiologies, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss



15.5.1 Introduction


Traditionally, the chief causes of RPL have been thought to be due to embryonic chromosomal abnormalities, maternal anatomic abnormalities such as a uterine septum, luteal phase defects, and antiphospholipid antibodies. Other factors such as infection and hypercoagulable state have also been considered but to a somewhat lesser degree.

When to initiate an RPL workup has been a source of recent debate. Classically, conducting a workup for RPL was recommended after three miscarriages. Recent data does not necessarily support this traditional evaluation protocol [18, 19]. The evaluation of healthy women after a single loss is usually not recommended as this a relatively common, sporadic event. However, the risk of another pregnancy loss after two miscarriages is only slightly lower (24–29%) than that of women with three or more spontaneous abortions (31–33%) [10]. Therefore, evaluation and treatment can reasonably be started after two consecutive miscarriages [3, 6, 7, 11]. Furthermore, additional testing such as chromosomal testing of the products of conception from a second miscarriage may confer a cost savings measure [18, 19]. Based on available data, we outline a new strategy for the workup of RPL (◘ Figs. 15.1 and 15.2).

An evaluation of an RPL patient should always include a complete history, including documentation of prior pregnancies, any pathologic tests that were performed on prior miscarriages, any evidence of chronic or acute infections or diseases, any recent physical or emotional trauma, history of cramping or bleeding with a previous miscarriage, any family history of pregnancy loss, and any previous gynecologic surgery or complicating factor. A summary of the diagnosis and management of recurrent pregnancy loss includes an investigation of genetic, endocrinologic, anatomic, immunologic, microbiologic, and iatrogenic causes (◘ Table 15.1).


Table 15.1
Diagnosis and management of recurrent pregnancy loss









































































Etiology

Diagnostic evaluation

Therapy

Genetic

Karyotype partners

Genetic counseling

Karyotype POCa

Donor gametes, PGDb

Anatomice

Hysterosalpingogram

Septum transection

Hysteroscopy

Myomectomy

Sonohysterography

Lysis of adhesions

Transvaginal 3D USc
 

Endocrinologic

Midluteal progesterone

Progesterone

TSH

Levothyroxine

Prolactin

Bromocriptine, dostinex

HgBalC

Metformin

Immunologic

Lupus anticoagulant

Aspirin

Antiphospholipid antibodies

Heparin + Aspirin

Anti β2 glycoprotein
 

Antithyroid antibodies (?)

Levothyroxine

Microbiologicd

Mycoplasma/ureaplasma

Antibiotics

Psychologic

Interview

Support groups

Iatrogenic

Tobacco, alcohol use, obesity

Eliminate consumption

Exposure to toxins, chemicals

Eliminate exposure


aProducts of conception

bPreimplantation genetic diagnosis

cTransvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound

dIndications for testing and treatment are not clearly established

eOnly one of these diagnostic tests needed

We outline a proposed algorithm for the evaluation and treatment of RPL (◘ Figs. 15.1 and 15.2). Under this new schema, no diagnostic/therapeutic action is recommended following one miscarriage unless clinically indicated, such as in the case of a submucosal myoma. A fetal karyotype is recommended after the second miscarriage. Products of conception (POC) to send for karyotype may be obtained from early nonviable pregnancies either via traditional D+C. POC may be sent for traditional karyotype or, as we recommend, be sent for 23 chromosome pair microarray evaluation.

The results of this POC karyotype guide further evaluation. If the POC are found to be aneuploid, no further evaluation or treatment is recommended at that juncture because the cause for the loss is known, though all future early miscarriages should also be subject to karyotypic evaluation. If an unbalanced chromosomal translocation or inversion is identified in the fetal POC, then the workup would focus on performing parental karyotypes and offering appropriate therapeutic options such as preimplantation genetic testing. If the fetal POC are found to be chromosomally normal, then a full RPL workup is to be done. If the fetal POC karyotypes have not been performed, then we recommend a full RPL workup after at least two miscarriages. The full RPL workup is outlined in ◘ Fig. 15.1.

What constitutes a full RPL is a topic of debate. We recommend including an anatomic evaluation, endocrinologic evaluation, testing for autoimmune factors, evaluating lifestyle and environmental factors, microbiologic factors and obtaining parental karyotypes if the karyotypic status of prior POC is unknown. Not included in this evaluation are more controversial types of testing and therapies such as those dealing with thrombophilic factors, immunotherapy, and other evaluations though these may be appropriate in certain clinical situations. Below, we describe the physiologic background, diagnostic approaches, and therapy of the various components of our proposed RPL workup. In addition, we will address other more controversial proposed etiologies of RPL.


15.6 Anatomic Causes of RPL


Anatomic causes of RPL are typically diagnosed using hysterosalpingography (HSG) or sonohysterography. Hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can supplement these tests as needed. Recently, transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasonography has been introduced and has allowed an accurate and non-invasive diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. The treatment of congenital and acquired uterine anomalies often involves corrective surgery.


15.6.1 Congenital Malformations


Congenital malformations of the reproductive tract result from failure to complete bilateral duct elongation, fusion, canalization, or septal resorption of the Müllerian ducts. Müllerian anomalies were found in 8–10% of women with three or more consecutive spontaneous abortions who underwent hysterosalpingography or hysteroscopic examination of their uteri [3, 4, 20]. Inadequate vascularity compromising the developing placenta and reduced intraluminal volume have been theorized as possible mechanisms leading to pregnancy loss.

The most common congenital abnormality associated with pregnancy loss is the septate uterus (◘ Fig. 15.3). The spontaneous abortion rate is high, averaging about 65% of pregnancies in some studies [21]. A septum is primarily composed of fibromuscular tissue that is poorly vascularized. This lack of vascularization may compromise decidual and placental growth. Alternatively, an uterine septum may impair fetal growth as a result of reduced endometrial capacity or a distorted endometrial cavity [21]. Uncontrolled studies suggest that resection of the uterine septum results in higher delivery rates than in women without treatment. Other congenital abnormalities such as uterine didelphys, bicornuate, and unicornuate uterus are more frequently associated with later trimester losses or preterm delivery.

A302653_3_En_15_Fig3_HTML.gif


Fig. 15.3
Uterine septum at hysteroscopy. This picture shows uterine septum as visualized during hysteroscopy


15.6.2 Intrauterine Adhesions


Intrauterine trauma resulting from endometrial curettage or endometritis is associated with a risk for the development of adhesions. Intrauterine adhesions (synechiae) are an acquired uterine defect that has been associated with recurrent miscarriage. The severity of adhesions may range from minimal to complete ablation of the endometrial cavity. The term Asherman’s syndrome is often used to describe intrauterine adhesions associated with oligo or amenorrhea. These adhesions are thought to interfere with the normal placentation and are treated with hysteroscopic resection. The insertion of an intrauterine balloon catheter for one week is recommended after resection of synechiae by some physicians to help prevent reformation of adhesions. During this time antibiotic prophylaxis with doxycycline (100 mg twice a day) is given to prevent endometritis. Patients may also be given estrogen and progestin for 1 month.


15.6.3 Intrauterine Masses


Intrauterine cavity abnormalities, such as submucosal leiomyomas and polyps, can contribute to pregnancy loss. Depending on the leiomyoma size and location, it may partially obliterate or alter the contour of the intrauterine cavity, providing a poorly vascularized endometrium for implantation or otherwise compromising placental development. Uterine leiomyomas and polyps may also act like an IUD, causing subacute endometritis (◘ Figs. 15.4 and 15.5). Until recently, it was felt that only submucous leiomyomas should be surgically removed prior to subsequent attempts at pregnancy. However, several recent studies investigating the implantation rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization have clearly demonstrated decreased implantation with intramural leiomyomas in the range of 30 mm [22]. Minimally invasive surgery is the method of choice to correct the uterine septum as well as to remove fibroids, adhesions, and polyps [23].

A302653_3_En_15_Fig4_HTML.gif


Fig. 15.4
Endometrial Polyp at Hysteroscopy. This picture shows an endometrial polyp as visualized during hysteroscopy


A302653_3_En_15_Fig5_HTML.gif


Fig. 15.5
Submucosal uterine myoma on saline infusion sonogram. This picture shows a submucosal myoma as visualized during saline infusion sonogram


15.6.4 Incompetence Cervix


Cervical incompetence can be considered as an acquired uterine anomaly that is associated with RPL. The diagnosis of cervical incompetence is based on the presence of painless cervical dilation resulting in the inability of the uterine cervix to retain a pregnancy. Cervical incompetence commonly causes pregnancy loss in the second, rather than first, trimester [24]. It may be associated with congenital uterine abnormalities such as septate or bicornuate uterus. Rarely, it may be congenital following in-utero exposure to Diethylstilbestrol. It is postulated that most cases occur as a result of surgical trauma to the cervix from conization, loop electrosurgical excision procedures, dilation of the cervix during pregnancy termination, or obstetric lacerations .


15.7 Endocrinologic Causes of RPL


Endocrine factors may contribute to 8–12% of recurrent pregnancy loss. Therefore, an endocrinologic evaluation is a critical component of the RPL workup [25].


15.7.1 Luteal Phase Deficiency


Maintenance of early pregnancy depends on the production of progesterone by the corpus luteum. Between 7 and 9 weeks of gestation the developing placenta takes over the progesterone production. Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) is defined as an inability of the corpus luteum to secrete progesterone in high enough amounts or for too short a duration. The preponderance of evidence suggests that LPD is a preovulatory event most likely linked to an alteration in the preovulatory estrogen stimulation which may indicate poor oocyte quality and a poorly functioning corpus luteum [26, 27]. Classically, the diagnosis is based upon results of endometrial biopsy, though this is currently not recommended as a diagnostic modality. Most authors advocate the measurement of serum progesterone levels in the luteal phase for the diagnosis of LPD with levels below 10 ng/ml considered abnormal [28]. However, progesterone levels are subject to large fluctuations because of pulsatile release of the LH hormone. Moreover, there is a lack of correlation between serum levels of progesterone and endometrial histology [29]. While conflicting data exist, a recent Cochrane review evaluating 15 trials concluded that there was a benefit to the routine administration of progesterone to all women with a history of RPL [30, 31]. Progesterone is available either as intravaginal suppositories (50–100 mg twice daily starting the third day after LH surge and continuing for 8–10 weeks) or as intramuscular injections (50 mg IM daily).


15.7.2 Untreated Hypothyroidism


Untreated hypothyroidism may increase the risk of miscarriage. A study of over 700 patients with recurrent pregnancy loss identified 7.6% with hypothyroidism [32]. Hypothyroidism is easily diagnosed with a sensitive TSH test and patients should be treated to become euthyroid (defined for the purposes of RPL as between 1.0 and 2.5 uIU/mL) before attempting a next pregnancy [1, 6, 30, 33]. The exact value at which to treat subclinical hypothyroidism is somewhat controversial, however, with some professional societies not recommending treatment with TSH levels less than 4 uIU/mL [34]. It has also been suggested that thyroid antibodies are elevated in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. A retrospective study of 700 patients with recurrent pregnancy loss demonstrated that 158 women had antithyroid antibodies but only 23 of those women had clinical hypothyroidism on the basis of an abnormal TSH value [35]. The presence of antithyroid antibodies may imply abnormal T-cell function, and therefore, more of an immune dysfunction rather than an endocrine disorder may be responsible for the pregnancy losses. The Endocrine Society recommends that patients with RPL be treated to keep a TSH level of between 1.0 and 2.5 uIU/mL in the first trimester [33]. For TSH levels found to be between 2.5–10 mIU/mL, a starting levothyroxine dose of at least 50 μg/d is recommended [33].


15.7.3 Abnormal Glucose Metabolism


Patients with poorly controlled diabetes are known to have an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage, which is reduced to normal spontaneous loss rates when women are euglycemic preconceptually [36]. Testing for fasting insulin and glucose is simple and treatment with insulin-sensitizing agents can reduce the risk of recurrent miscarriage [37]. More recently, determining the average load of blood glucose through testing of hemoglobin A1C has become an increasingly utilized modality to evaluate insulin resistance [6, 7]. Because there is strong evidence that obesity and/or insulin resistance are associated with an increased risk of miscarriage, weight reduction in obese women is a first step in the treatment. Metformin seems to improve pregnancy outcome, but the evidence for this treatment is limited to a few cohort studies. Metformin is a Category B medication in the first trimester of pregnancy and appears to be safe. Other endocrine abnormalities, such as thyroid disorders and diabetes, should be corrected prior to conception.


15.7.4 Hyperprolactinemia


Normal circulating levels of prolactin may play an important role in maintaining early pregnancy Data from animal studies suggest that elevated prolactin levels may adversely affect corpus luteal function; however, this concept has not been proven in humans [38]. A recent study of 64 hyperprolactinemic women showed that bromocriptine therapy was associated with a higher rate of successful pregnancy and that prolactin levels were significantly higher in women who miscarried [39].


15.7.5 Diminished Ovarian Reserve


Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is thought to be a marker of the number of follicles available for recruitment on any given menstrual cycle. Therefore, elevated levels of FSH in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle are representative of diminished ovarian reserve; a condition in which there a low number of follicular units available for recruitment. More recently, other markers, such as decreased anti-Müllerian hormone, have been introduced to identify diminished ovarian reserve. Although the frequency of elevated day 3 FSH levels in women with recurrent miscarriage is similar to the frequency in the infertile population, the prognosis of recurrent miscarriages is worsened with increased day 3 FSH levels [40]. Although no treatment is available, testing may be helpful in women over the age of 35 with recurrent pregnancy loss, and appropriate counseling should follow.


15.8 Autoimmune/Thrombotic Factors as the Cause of RPL



15.8.1 Immunologic Disorders



Autoimmune Factors: Maternal Response to Self


In some instances, there is a failure in normal control mechanisms that prevent an immune reaction against self, resulting in an autoimmune response [41]. Autoantibodies to phospholipids, thyroid antigens, nuclear antigens, and others have been investigated as possible causes for pregnancy loss [32]. Antiphospholipid antibodies include the lupus anticoagulant, anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies, and anticardiolipin antibodies. There is still controversy concerning testing for other phospholipids, but an increasing number of studies suggest that antibodies to phosphatidylserine are also associated with pregnancy loss [42]. Women with systemic lupus erythematosus and aPL have increased risks for miscarriage compared to those with lupus and negative aPL [43].


Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS) :

APS is an autoimmune condition characterized by the production of moderate to high levels of antiphospholipid antibodies (APS) and certain clinical features [44] (◘ Table 15.2). The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (anticardiolipin and lupus anticoagulant) during pregnancy is a major risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome [45]. In large meta-analysis of studies of couples with recurrent abortion, the incidence of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome was between 15 and 20% compared to about 5% in nonpregnant women without a history of obstetrical complications [46, 47].


Table 15.2
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome































Clinical

Laboratory

Pregnancy morbidity

IgG aCLa

 ≥1 unexplained death at ≥10 weeks or

IgM aCLa

 Delivery at ≤34 weeks with severe PIH or

Positive lupus anticoagulant test

 Three or more losses before 10 weeks

IgG anti β2 Glycoprotein 1a

Thrombosis

IgG anti β2 Glycoprotein 1a

 Venous
 

 Arterial, including stroke
 


Modified from Miyakis et al. [40]

Patients should have at least one clinical and one laboratory feature at some time in the course of their disease. Laboratory tests should be positive on at least two occasions

GPL IgG phospholipid units, MPL IgM phospholipid units, PIH pregnancy induced hypertension

a≥99th percentile

Several mechanisms have been proposed by which antiphospholipid antibodies (aPl) might mediate pregnancy loss. Classically, it was believed that aPl antibodies induced thromboses in vessels surrounding the placental-maternal unit, resulting in placental infarction and fetal death. However, recent data suggests that the primary mechanism by which aPl antibodies lead to miscarriage may be via a deleterious effect conferred directly on trophoblastic cells and/or endothelial cells [48, 49]. aPl antibodies can interact with cultured human vascular endothelial cells with resultant injury and/or activation [49]. Furthermore, aPl have been demonstrated to inhibit secretion of human placental chorionic gonadotropin and to inhibit the expression of trophoblast cell adhesion molecules (alpha 1 and alpha 5 integrins, E and VE cadherins). These mechanisms could explain RPL secondary to aPl antibodies early in the first trimester [46].

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is treated with a combination of low dose heparin (5000–10,000 units subcutaneously every 12 h) and low dose aspirin (81 mg PO daily) appears to be effective and may reduce pregnancy loss by 54% in women with APS [41, 50]. Aspirin alone does not appear to reduce miscarriage rates [51]. Unfractionated heparin is preferred to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) based on available data [52].

Treatment with steroids is not recommended based on current evidence [46, 50]. Aspirin should be started preconceptually and heparin should be started after the first positive pregnancy test [49]. Treatment should be continued until the time of delivery because these women are at an increased risk for thrombosis. Post-partum thromboprophylaxis is reasonable for a short interval to prevent thrombosis when the risk is high [47]. The adverse reactions associated with heparin include bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and osteoporosis with fracture. Calcium (600 mg twice daily) with added vitamin D supplementation (400 IU daily) and weight–bearing exercise are encouraged to decrease the risk of osteoporosis. In any pregnant woman starting on heparin, the platelet count should be monitored weekly for the first 2 weeks after initiation, and after any dosage change. Women with APS should consider avoiding the use of estrogen-containing oral contraceptives in the future.


Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy for alloimmune disorders is based on the hypothesis that spontaneous abortion occurs due to a failure of maternal immunological adaptation to the developing conceptus resulting in a form of transplantation rejection. Although some randomized double blinded studies have shown an increase with therapies such as paternal leukocyte immunization, trophoblast immune infusion, intravenous intralipid therapy, and immunoglobulin infusion in successful pregnancy outcomes, other have not confirmed these results [5356]. A Cochrane review of 19 trials of various forms of immunotherapy did not show significant differences between treatment and control groups [57]. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of these therapies for RPL. Testing for Th-1 and Th-2 profiles, parental HLA-profiles, alloantibodies, NK cells, antiparental cytotoxic antibodies or embryotoxic factor assessment are currently not clinically justified.


Antinuclear Antibodies

Approximately 10–15% of all women will have detectable antinuclear antibodies regardless of their history of pregnancy loss. Their chance of successful pregnancy outcome is not dependent on the presence or absence of antinuclear antibodies. Treatments such as steroids have been shown to increase the maternal and fetal complications without benefiting livebirths [58]. Thus, routine testing and treatment for antinuclear antibodies is not indicated.


Lifestyle issues in RPL



Microbiologic Causes of RPL

Certain infectious agents have been identified more frequently in cultures from women who have had spontaneous pregnancy losses [59]. These include Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, and Chlamydia. Increasing evidence is accumulating that chronic endometritis is more frequently identified in women with RPL and that directed antibiotic therapy may improve outcomes. It is important to be aware that none of these pathogens have been causally linked to RPL. Because of the association with sporadic pregnancy losses, the ease of diagnosis, and the increasing evidence for the role of infection in RPL some clinicians will test women with RPL and treat for the appropriate pathogen in both parents.

Appropriate antibiotic therapy should be instituted in both parents when cervical infections are identified. Infections with Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, and Chlamydia are treated with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily by mouth for 14 days. For those that fail treatment based on a test of cure culture, the options are to extend treatment of both partners to 30 days or to use ofloxacin 300 mg daily for 14 days for both partners.


15.8.2 Thrombotic Disorders


Thrombophilias are thought to be responsible for more than half of maternal venous thromboembolisms in pregnancy, however ACOG recommends that only patients with a personal or family history of thromboembolic events should be tested [60]. The association of inherited and acquired thrombophilias with adverse pregnancy outcome is still being investigated but current evidence suggests a limited role [61]. The recommended evaluations for patients with a personal or strong family history of thrombosis are:


  1. (a)


    Factor V Leiden screening with activated protein C resistance using a second generation coagulation assay is probably the most cost-effective approach. Patients with a low APC resistance ratio (<2.0) should then be genotyped for the factor V Leiden mutation.

     

  2. (b)


    Prothrombin G20210A gene mutation using PCR.

     

  3. (c)
Sep 24, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Recurrent Early Pregnancy Loss

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access