37 Prenatal and Neonatal Palliative Care

Renee Boss, Karen Kavanaugh, Kathie Kobler

Having the baby was a surreal experience; it was entering a world of unknowns and uncertainties. Would he be born alive? Would he live for minutes, hours, days, or months?

For most, pregnancy is a time filled with joyful anticipation of welcoming a new life into the family. Technological advances provide early confirmation of pregnancy, thus allowing parents to share their news with others, often just weeks after conception. Technology also permits clinicians to detect life-threatening fetal complications. Each year in the United States, more than one million pregnancies will end in fetal death, many due to genetic abnormalities. More than 26,000 babies between 20 and 40 weeks’ gestation will be stillborn, and nearly 18,000 neonates will die within the first 28 days of life, with nearly half of these deaths due to congenital diseases and/or prematurity.¹ Gestational risk factors such as a family history of genetic diseases or maternal chronic illness can result in repeated losses.

Families may learn that their baby has a life-threatening fetal diagnosis early in pregnancy, in the prenatal period just prior to delivery, or in the neonatal period after birth. As parents learn of a life-threatening fetal condition, they bear the difficult task of shifting from joyful welcoming of new life to comprehending the ramifications of their baby’s diagnosis. Palliative care in each scenario is targeted to families’ unique needs after diagnosis, when families begin to grieve the loss of a “normal” pregnancy or infant.² Fetal-neonatal conditions that would benefit from the interventions and support of palliative care can include rare syndromes such as anencephaly and Potter’s syndrome, all extremely premature infants, and infants with severe birth injuries. We will describe how interdisciplinary clinicians can deliver integrated, compassionate, and evidence-based services for these infants and families.

In this chapter, we discuss prenatal-neonatal palliative and end-of-life care. Often the term perinatal is used to describe care around the time of birth; we will use prenatal and neonatal to be more precise. We will highlight the unique contributions of interdisciplinary team (IDT) clinicians, as related to four distinct periods (Fig. 37-1):

• Early prenatal period: the life-threatening fetal diagnosis is made weeks to months before birth

• Late prenatal period: the life-threatening fetal diagnosis is made hours to days before birth

• Early neonatal period: the neonatal death occurs in the first hours to days of life

• Late neonatal period: the neonate’s or infant’s death occurs in the first weeks to months of life

Fig. 37-1 Periods of prenatal and neonatal palliative care.

A general overview of concepts and issues common to all periods will be presented first, followed by more specific information pertinent to each of the four periods. In this chapter, we conclude with information specific to end-of-life care and bereavement. Whenever available, data from relevant clinical research across disciplines are referenced. Because of the ethical and logistical limitations to research with pregnant women, women in labor, and parents of critically ill newborns, data are sometimes limited or absent. Where data are lacking, our recommendations are drawn from historical and current texts, and from the clinical experience of interdisciplinary experts.

IDT Clinicians and Roles

The diagnosis and management of a life-threatening condition for an infant can span the prenatal and neonatal periods, and may require the involvement of unique interdisciplinary team clinicians not found in other areas of pediatric palliative care (Fig. 37-2). Not uncommonly, IDT clinicians work in different clinics, hospitals, or even cities due to the nature of regionalized neonatal care. For example, a life-threatening fetal diagnosis may be made by a community obstetrician, with subsequent management of both mother and baby by multiple subspecialists at a large referral center. Particular effort must be made to communicate well and to provide seamless care to families throughout this trajectory of care.

Fig. 37-2 Potential interdisciplinary team members.

Supporting families’ practical needs

Mothers with a high-risk pregnancy are often hospitalized for a prolonged period before birth. The mother’s hospitalization can profoundly disrupt the life of the family, and mothers often worry about this burden on their loved ones.³ Distance from home to the regional hospital may be significant, with the associated costs of travelling and parking. Families with a limited income may be forced to visit during late hours when parking is free, which can affect communication with daytime care providers.

Environments that are conducive to and promote family presence are essential. Privacy and lenient visitation hours are important to women hospitalized prenatally.³ When private rooms are not available, strategies are needed to maintain confidentiality during parent-provider discussions. Parents are very cognizant of and appreciative for those clinicians who go out of their way to enable family members to be present with them at their time of distress.⁴

Fathers, in particular, may need to balance multiple demands to be physically present at the hospital, care for other children, and work to provide for the family. Grandparents may not know how to support their children through something that they themselves have never experienced. Staff can help families with simple tasks such as obtaining a food tray for the visiting father or informing the family about parking discounts, to ensure that families’ most basic needs are being addressed.

Siblings may be aware of a baby’s expected arrival before the life-threatening fetal diagnosis is made. Siblings have their own feelings of anticipation, excitement, sadness, or ambivalence. IDT clinicians may need to provide families with strategies to allow siblings to maintain closeness with their mother during her hospitalization while maintaining as normal of a home routine as possible. Parents may need suggestions about how to include their children in the events surrounding the baby’s birth and death.⁵ Child life specialists can offer creative avenues of art, play, and interactive therapies to assist these children as they meet and say good-bye to their baby brother or sister.

Communication

When families learn of a life-threatening fetal or neonatal condition, providers may feel an urgency to communicate essential information quickly, without careful attention to the way it is presented. Whenever possible, providers should anticipate the impact of the information on a family already under significant stress. Priority should be placed on asking parents who else should be present for discussions regarding treatment decisions. Meeting times should not be restricted to routine morning or evening rounds, and should allow for extended family presence. Family members often assist the parent to recall information given during these meetings. If a discussion must occur with the mother or father alone, a nurse or other clinician should be assigned to help the parent interpret the information. Sequential discussions are often needed. Parents should be encouraged to write down information and questions, and should be provided with a means to do so.

The importance of clear, honest, and compassionate communication is central to prenatal and neonatal palliative care.⁶^–⁹ Clinicians can convey empathy through careful listening and anticipation of the family’s needs. Respect is apparent when clinicians refer to the baby by his or her given name. Respect extends to colleagues when conflicting opinions, which often arise in prenatal and neonatal decision- making, are approached in a professional manner. A family’s confidence and trust in the healthcare team are eroded if they witness disrespectful behavior among members of the team. An example of disrespectful behavior is when clinicians are openly critical of the competency of their colleagues because of a disagreement with a medical diagnosis and/or a management decision. These conversations should never occur in the family’s presence or where the conversations could be overheard. A family needs to know that clinicians work collaboratively as a team and with the family to identify a plan of care.

Decision-making

Families who receive a diagnosis of a potentially lethal fetal or neonatal condition face decisions that are unparalleled in other areas of pediatrics, and range from pregnancy termination to experimental fetal surgery. The level of uncertainty is also unparalleled, as decisions are often necessary before birth when diagnosis and prognosis are rarely definite. This can create moral dilemmas for providers and parents as they consider options.

Internationally, there is significant variation in the process of decision-making for these infants. In countries with paternalistic models of medical care, physicians decide which infants will receive life-sustaining therapies, without family input.¹⁰ In the United States, parent-provider collaboration in shared decision-making has become increasingly important. Neonatologists acknowledge that, at times, family autonomy in decision-making may even surpass the authority of the medical team.¹¹^–¹³ For instance, a neonatologist may not feel comfortable limiting delivery room resuscitation for an infant born at weeks’ gestation if the family requests that “everything be done,” even when the likelihood of survival is extremely low.

Best practices for engaging in shared decision-making before, during, and after birth are not clear. Ideally, multiple interdisciplinary discussions would occur with families over time while minimizing the stressors of maternal illness, pain, and disruption of the family’s home life. But this rarely occurs. While data about these interactions are limited, retrospective data suggest that parent-provider collaboration in these scenarios is incomplete. A study interviewing the parents and neonatologists within 24 hours of counseling showed there was only 59% agreement that a management plan had been formulated.¹⁴

Parents and providers may come to these conversations with very different priorities. Neonatologists often emphasize predictions of morbidities and mortality,¹⁵^–¹⁷ yet families often focus on emotions, hope, and religious and spiritual beliefs.^18,¹⁹ Those who became pregnant through assisted reproduction or who have suffered repeated losses may be particularly committed to continuing a pregnancy, regardless of predictions of illness or death.²⁰ Families may possess unrealistic expectations for their infant based on media portrayal of “miracle babies.”

As with older children, parents have the right to act as surrogate decision makers for their infants. But surrogate decision-making for infants is unique in several ways. The concept of prior preferences does not apply to newborns. Parents and providers may differ significantly in their perceptions of a “good” quality of life for infants; in one study, parents were more likely than providers to believe that attempts should be made to save all infants, regardless of projected outcomes.²¹ New parents already expecting to bring home a totally dependent infant may underestimate the consequences of decisions that may extend this dependence indefinitely.

Shared decision-making requires IDT clinicians to assist families in expressing their values and goals while focusing on the infant’s best interests. Families should be asked about what the pregnancy or the infant means to them, and what they believe is a good quality of life. They should be encouraged to talk with important extended family members and religious leaders. They should be asked about their preferred decision-making role, and reminded that the IDT is there to support them regardless of the decision.

Families must be cautioned that, once a decision is made, diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty may translate into unexpected outcomes. The family who makes a carefully detailed birth plan involving out-of-state family members and religious rituals may suffer a fetal death before birth. Families who opt for non-resuscitation of an extremely premature infant to prevent infant suffering may deliver a vigorous baby weighing 200 g more than predicted. Providers and families alike should prepare for the possibility that management decisions may need to be altered quickly based on new information.²²^–²⁴

Finally, it should be noted that not all management options are equally available to families. Hospital and state policies can impact provider willingness to offer the options of pregnancy termination, non-initiation of resuscitation, and withdrawal of therapy.^25,²⁶

Hope

Redefining hope is critical during prenatal and neonatal palliative care. Families are often unprepared for the diagnosis of a potentially lethal fetal or neonatal condition. Physicians may worry that talking about hope will create unrealistic expectations, yet parents who have gone through this have emphasized that, regardless of the infant’s prognosis, parents need providers to give them hope for something.^18,^19,²⁷ One study found that physicians who provided more hope to families were not necessarily more likely to predict survival, but they did express emotion and showed parents that they were touched by the tragedy of the situation.¹⁸ Adult patients with a terminal diagnosis said providers can provide hope by shifting the focus to what can be realistically achieved versus what can only be wished for.²⁸ For the IDT that is counseling a family, this might mean openly acknowledging the grief and pain of the situation, reassuring the family that the team will join in their hope that the infant’s outcome will be a good one, and helping them to imagine how they might want events to proceed if the outcome is death or severe disability.

It is helpful to talk with families about what is meaningful to them, such as the possibility of holding a baby who is alive, or making sure that the infant does not experience pain. Hope for a good outcome may need to be redefined repeatedly over time in a way that helps families to cherish what is possible with their infant. For parents expecting multiple babies, parental hope for each of the developing fetuses in utero may hang in a delicate balance, especially if one is diagnosed with a life-threatening condition. When the death of a multiple occurs, parents must simultaneous maintain hope for the surviving babies while experiencing grief for their loss.²⁹

Cultural, religious, and spiritual issues

Families often struggle to make meaning of a child’s death in the context of their cultural, religious, spiritual, or existential beliefs. This struggle may inform the decisions families make regarding their infant. A 2010 text ³⁰ provides an excellent reference for neonatal end-of-life care issues as related to a number of religious traditions. Several aspects of religion and prenatal and/or neonatal end-of-life care should be noted. In some traditions, a fetus is not recognized as a person until it is born alive. Parents from these traditions who experience a miscarriage or stillbirth may feel abandoned by their communities, and may need additional resources from the IDT. In other traditions, families may struggle to reconcile pregnancy termination or withdrawal of neonatal care with religious doctrine. Talking with their own religious leader and/or a hospital chaplain can be invaluable, both by alleviating family guilt and by helping the medical team to better understand the parents’ values. Obstetric and neonatal wards often limit visitors; accommodations need to be made for families’ cultural or religious end-of-life rituals. One advantage of home hospice for infants is the opportunity for families to more freely participate in religious and cultural rituals.

Studies of adults who face end-of-life decisions for themselves or their family members suggest that race and ethnicity impact choices about life-sustaining therapies. While this issue has not yet been evaluated for prenatal and neonatal end-of-life care, IDT clinicians should be prepared to assess the role that race or ethnicity may play in parents’ decisions.

Professional Caregiver Suffering and Moral Distress

As in other areas of pediatric palliative care, being with families throughout their baby’s dying can be deeply rewarding but can also lead to suffering by the professional caregiver. Suffering is intensified in situations involving moral distress, which often characterizes the uncertainty of prenatal and neonatal prognosis.³¹ Tragic infant deaths and cumulative losses can make it difficult for a clinician to create meaning in his or her profession. clinicians who themselves are childbearing or childrearing may closely identify with families, particularly when clinicians have a long-term relationship with the family. Though such sensitivity can promote empathy in the clinician, it can also cause death anxiety and grief. A dual-process model of clinician’s grief has been described: clinicians will simultaneously experience grief reactions by focusing on the loss and avoiding grief reactions by focusing on other aspects of a patient’s care.^32,³³

Infant deaths often occur in environments that do not support clinicians’ needs. Prenatal deaths may occur in birth centers, where care is focused on healthy births, often evidenced by names such as the New Life Center. Clinicians in birth centers may struggle to care for bereaved families while simultaneously caring for parents who are birthing healthy infants.³⁴ Neonatal deaths often occur in intensive care units, which rarely emphasize the sacredness of the end-of-life experience. Though clinicians may join in annual rituals to honor deceased patients and their own grief, support during acute losses may not be available.

IDT clinicians from varying disciplines have unique experiences with families at the end of life. For example, while neonatal nurses rarely feel involved in decision-making, neonatal physicians feel very responsible for end-of-life decision-making.³⁵ These differences may make it difficult for providers to fully support each other. IDT clinicians, such as chaplains, with expertise in addressing suffering could facilitate self-care for others.

Strategies for minimizing professional caregiver suffering must also take place at the organizational level. An educational intervention in end-of-life care, which included content on prevention of compassion fatigue, has been shown to increase the comfort of neonatal nurses who care for a dying infant.³⁶ Other strategies might include a core group of clinicians to serve as a resource on all shifts, case reviews of each death for all disciplines, engaging mental health liaisons for debriefing, and providing meaningful gestures to clinicians, such as massages. Co-creation of ritual may provide clinicians with opportunities to both support bereaved families and facilitate their own grief work³³ (Fig. 37-3).

Fig. 37-3 IDT clinicians join parents in a ritual of thanksgiving and blessing for baby Logan before his death.

(Photograph provided courtesy of Todd Hochberg.)

The Four Periods of Prenatal and Neonatal Palliative Care

In this section, we discuss considerations for patients and families in each of four periods: early prenatal period, late prenatal period, early neonatal period, and late neonatal period. Case studies are followed by recommendations for specific interventions for each patient population.

Early prenatal palliative care

Mr. and Mrs. Chang are expecting their fourth baby, with prenatal care provided by a community obstetrician who speaks the family’s primary language, Korean. A routine ultrasound at 18 weeks’ gestation reveals the baby has probable cardiac, renal, and neural tube defects. The obstetrician recommends further testing at an urban medical center 60 miles away.

Hesitantly, the Changs travel to the medical center, where further testing reveals a diagnosis of trisomy 18 and multiple anomalies. Without an interpreter, the medical center team shares the diagnosis, offering Mrs. Chang the option to terminate her pregnancy. Upon hearing this news, Mr. and Mrs. Chang decline to discuss other options for their baby’s care, and return home. No further communication occurs among the medical center staff, the community obstetrician, or the family.

At 37 weeks’ gestation, Mrs. Chang presents at the community hospital in active labor. As she is admitted to the labor and delivery ward, her 12-year-old daughter translates, telling the nurse, “My mother is very scared because my father is at work right now and they think the baby may be sick.”

Before a thorough history can be obtained, the baby is born. He requires immediate intubation, chest compressions, umbilical line placement, and medications. Within 30 minutes of birth, the baby is stabilized, and transport is arranged for the baby to a Level 3 NICU at a regional medical center. Mrs. Chang briefly views her son before signing consents for the transfer of his care. Mr. Chang arrives at the community hospital just minutes after the ambulance’s departure with his son.

Upon arrival at the NICU, the neonatologist suspects a chromosomal disorder, and orders genetic testing. Aggressive intervention is provided to sustain the baby until a diagnosis can be confirmed. With aid of an interpreter, the baby’s current condition and suspected diagnosis is shared with Mr. and Mrs. Chang over the phone. Mr. Chang tells the staff to “do everything” for their baby.

Twelve hours later, Baby Chang’s condition deteriorates. He does not respond to resuscitation, and dies. His parents receive a phone call in Mrs. Chang’s postpartum room, notifying them of their son’s death.

The delivery of palliative care in the early prenatal period (EPP) presents a unique challenge in planning for a patient who is not yet born. As a life-threatening condition is identified in utero, both parents and providers must transition care goals in preparation for a baby who may die shortly after birth. The provision of palliative care subsequently unfolds during three distinct phases: in the prenatal period, during labor and delivery, and eventually throughout the baby’s living and dying.

Setting

As illustrated in the case study, EPP palliative care may begin in the obstetrician’s office. Further evaluation may involve specialist consultations at a regional hospital far from the family’s home. In some instances, diagnosis of a specific prenatal condition, such as twin-to-twin transfusion or monoamniotic twins, may require the parents to travel out of state for specialized prenatal care. The emergence of hospital-based fetal care programs affords each IDT clinician the opportunity to initiate palliative care throughout the trajectory of care.³⁷ If the baby survives past delivery and beyond the time of the mother’s discharge from the hospital, palliative and hospice care may be provided in the family’s home. Some families may opt for home birth, with care provided by a hospice and midwife team.

Interdisciplinary Team Clinicians

Parents who receive a life-threatening fetal diagnosis may interact with numerous IDT clinicians at multiple sites of care. In fact, each discipline represented in Fig. 37–2 could interact with the family throughout pregnancy, delivery, and the baby’s birth and death. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that a key point person be identified who can facilitate continuity throughout the trajectory of care. As one mother reported to the advanced practice nurse who filled such a role on the palliative care team: “You were our safe, familiar center in the middle of this frightening storm.”

Communication

In addition to the principles of communication discussed in this chapter’s introduction, there are particular considerations during the EPP.

IDT clinicians should establish and maintain a relationship with the family as the pregnancy continues, supporting the family and facilitating attachment to the baby. Clinicians can help parents anticipate questions from bystanders about the pregnancy. It may be helpful to schedule prenatal visits before or after regular office hours. Some sites may offer separate childbirth education sessions separate from classes for families expecting healthy babies.³⁸

Throughout the EPP, clinicians may find themselves reviewing test results and other prognostic information with parents on multiple occasions. Patience and compassionate listening skills are important. Clinicians should explore with parents how best to provide updates on the baby’s status before, during, and after birth. Parents may worry about how their baby will tolerate labor. Clear expectations should be established about the management plan should fetal distress occur during labor. When the plan is for non-initiation of delivery room resuscitation, good communication among the obstetric, neonatal, and pediatric teams can help make this experience the least obtrusive as possible for families, so that they can cherish the time that they have with their infant. A palliative care order set or protocol can be a helpful communication tool, and should specify orders for vital signs, medications, fluids and/or nutrition, and who should be called to declare death and complete post-mortem documentation (Box 37-1). Staff training and preparation is important, as obstetric and newborn nursery staff who typically care for healthy infants may be unfamiliar with and uncomfortable with neonatal end-of-life care.

BOX 37-1 Sample Palliative Care Order Set for Neonate Following Delivery

1. Admission Diagnosis: ______________________________________

2. Birth Weight ___________ kg

3. Do Not Resuscitate (Refer to DNR order form)

4. Admit to ___NICU ___Newborn Nursery for comfort care

5. Infant to stay in mother’s postpartum room at all times. If respite care needed, may transfer to NICU per parents’ request

6. No cardiorespiratory monitoring. Assess for breathing/heart beat prn, per patient status changes.

7. Nutrition/Hydration: Per family’s request (e.g., breastfeeding prn as tolerated. No formula supplementation).

8. Provide non-pharmacologic measures prn for irritability or mild pain:

Swaddle in warm blankets

Holding

Pacifier

Sucrose

9. For moderate pain and/or dyspnea control:_________________ (e.g., morphine)

10. With cessation of breathing/heart rate, page __________for death pronouncement.

11. Expiration paperwork to be initiated by ______________________.

Creation of a Birth Plan and Advance Directive

The use of a written birth plan and advance directive can facilitate communication during the EPP.³⁸^–⁴⁰ The co-creation of a birth plan between parents and clinicians provides an opportunity for parents to be actively involved in their baby’s care. As one mother eloquently stated, “this is a special kind of nesting I can do to prepare for my son.”

A well-crafted planning tool should effectively communicate the parents’ wishes for care of the mother during labor and delivery, and should be partnered with advance directives outlining appropriate medical and palliative interventions for the baby. Box 37-2 highlights possible components of a palliative care birth plan and advance directives. It is important to note that this tool is effective only if it is shared, discussed, and readily accessible to all IDT clinicians before the baby’s birth.

BOX 37-2 Components of a Prenatal Palliative Birth Plan and Neonatal Advance Directive

Opening Statement

Summarizes parents’ overall goal for their baby

Example: We would like to honor our son’s living, minimize his suffering, and share as many meaningful moments with him as possible.

Care of Mother and Baby During Labor and Delivery • Timing, route and location of the baby’s delivery • Management of mother’s pain during labor

• Extent of monitoring baby’s heart beat during labor

• If parents have strong desire to meet the baby alive, possible interventions for fetal distress

• Presence of family members or friends

• Faith traditions, prayers or rituals to be initiated soon after baby’s birth Initial Care Management of the Baby

• Extent of desired resuscitation measures, or clear DNR/Limitation of emergency treatment orders

• Drying baby thoroughly after birth and placing on warm, clean blankets

• Use of warmth to maximize comfort and minimize unwanted symptoms

• Use of suctioning and free flow oxygen

• Management of pain, dyspnea, seizures or other symptoms Care for the Family Following Delivery

• Opportunities to maximize family’s time together, including sibling presence, memory making and keepsake activities, ritual, and photographs

• Plan for communicating baby’s status to family and friends not at the hospital Ongoing Care Management for the Baby

• Comfort measures, including warmth, mouth and lip care, kangaroo care, skin care

• Potential initiation of nutrition: breast and/or bottle feeding, formula via dropper, gavage feedings

• Use of suctioning and free flow oxygen

• Management of pain, dyspnea, seizures or other symptoms

• Plan for extent of diagnostic testing, such as no x-rays, ultrasounds, or blood draws

• Plan for if baby will stay in mother’s postpartum room, newborn nursery, or NICU Discharge Plan for Infants Who Survive the Postpartum Period

• Anticipatory plan for baby’s care when mother ready to be discharged from the hospital

• Care of the baby in the NICU, home palliative and/or hospice care, community hospice

End-of-Life Care Needs

Some families may not want to address these issues prior to baby’s death.

• Location of death

• Family’s preferred funeral director

• Autopsy, Post mortem biopsy, and/or special genetic testing

• Organ or tissue donation plans if appropriate

Contact Information

For the following as needed: Palliative care coordinator or primary IDT contact, consulting physicians, family’s clergy or pastor, photographer, local prenatal, pediatric palliative care, or hospice program.

Decision Making

The process of decision making in the EPP begins at diagnosis. As reflected in the case study, parents may be offered the option to terminate the pregnancy. Clinicians presenting such options should be clear about any institutional policies related to terminations, such as family counseling, ethical review, or committee approval. Decisions about termination often reflect parents’ moral, ethical and religious views. Data are limited regarding pregnancy outcome following a lethal fetal diagnosis, with two programs reporting 60 percent of parents opting to terminate the pregnancy.^37,⁴¹ Termination decisions may be further complicated if the family has experienced infertility, or with the diagnosis of a life-threatening condition with one fetus of a multiple pregnancy.

For those parents who choose to continue the pregnancy, subsequent decision making is guided by the certainty of diagnosis, the certainty of prognosis, and the meaning of that prognosis to the parents.³⁹ Together, IDT clinicians and parents work to determine those interventions that are of best interest for the baby, weighing treatment benefits and burdens. There are several congenital conditions for which neonatal resuscitation at birth is not recommended, including anencephaly and trisomy 13. In addition, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)²³ and the Neonatal Resuscitation Program⁴² confirm that resuscitation may be forgone in any scenario if infant survival is unlikely. It is important to note that the number of conditions for which there are clear recommendations for non-resuscitation has decreased steadily over time, as medicine and technology diminish the chance that a disease will be lethal.⁴³

Providers should be aware that death at very early gestational age may present unique issues regarding hospital practices and disposition options. In most states, pregnancies ending before 20 weeks’ completed gestation do not require reporting or the generation of a fetal death certificate. Therefore, parents experiencing an early pregnancy loss are not legally bound to make any disposition choice, and most states do not require clinicians to notify parents that they have a choice in the disposition of their tiny baby’s body. If and when a fetal death occurs, IDT clinicians should be mindful of hospital, local and state ordinances and practices regarding options for disposition, and communicate these to parents in an appropriate, considerate and consistent manner.

For infants who survive birth, decision-making is an ongoing process guided by the infant’s status during critical transition points, including the immediate postpartum period and the maternal hospital discharge. Together, IDT clinicians work to promote maximum comfort for the family and infant while accommodating evolving needs and preferences. If a mother requests hospital discharge soon after birth and before the baby’s death, staff may have little time to adequately provide information and address all of the parents’ needs. Routine follow-up after hospital discharge is essential as decision making unfolds.

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue