Premature Rise of Progesterone During Ovarian Stimulation




© Springer India 2015
Surveen Ghumman (ed.)Principles and Practice of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in ART10.1007/978-81-322-1686-5_25


25. Premature Rise of Progesterone During Ovarian Stimulation



R. K. Sharma  and Arti Kapoor1


(1)
IVF & Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Reproductive Medicine and IVF Center, Primus Super Specialty Hospital, Chandergupt Marg, Chankayapuri, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India

 



 

R. K. Sharma



Abstract

Premature rise of progesterone in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles influences IVF outcome. Several authors failed to demonstrate any negative impact while others reported the detrimental effect associated with progesterone rise (pre-ovulatory). It seems that P rise >1.5 ng/ml may have deleterious effect on endometrial receptivity, accelerating the endometrial maturation process that desynchronizes the crosstalk between the embryo and endometrium during implantation. This decreases the pregnancy rate. Progesterone elevations on the day of hCG in GnRH analogue cycles are the result of the ovarian stimulation itself, driven by high follicle-stimulating hormone dosages, high oestradiol levels, the increased number of follicles and oocytes, increased sensitivity of LH receptor of the granulosa cells to FSH or poor ovarian response with increased LH sensitivity. To prevent the premature rise of progesterone in COS, we should use milder stimulation protocols, earlier trigger of ovulation in high responders and single-blastocyst transfer on day 5. The optimal GnRH analogue protocols during the entire stimulation period appear to be the long agonist as well as ‘long’ and long GnRH antagonist regimens (oral contraceptive pre-treated fixed antagonist regime). The most appropriate choice to avoid the negative effects of follicular progesterone elevations is to cancel fresh embryo transfer and to transfer frozen-thawed embryos in natural cycles.

Premature luteinization (PL) refers to a rise in serum progesterone (P) levels on the day of hCG administration. Most studies used an absolute P level on the day of hCG administration as an indicator of PL, and the cut-off level differed from 0.8 to 2 ng/mL. Some authors defined PL as a P/E2 ratio of >1. There is a marked variation in the incidence (13–71 %) of PL due to discrepancies in definition, population characteristics and/or treatment protocols. The pathogenesis of PL in COH is still poorly understood. Several hypotheses may be considered to explain this phenomenon: elevation of follicular LH levels, serum accumulation of HCG from HMG, increased LH receptor sensitivity of the granulosa cells to FSH or poor ovarian response with increased LH sensitivity. The consequences of this premature elevation of serum P on IVF outcome remain controversial. Attempts to prevent COH include use of low-dose hCG alone in the late COH stages, flexible antagonist protocol, use of mifepristone, aspiration of a single leading follicle and hCG administration when the levels of serum P exceeded 1.0 ng/mL.


Keywords
Premature rise of progesteroneOvulation inductionEndometriumPregnancy ratePremature luetinizationOvarian stimulationLH



25.1 Introduction


The incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge has significantly decreased by the introduction of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for pituitary suppression in in vitro fertilization (IVF) [1]. Despite pituitary down-regulation, however, several researchers have described a phenomenon reported as premature rise in serum progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration or late follicular phase [2]. Decreased implantation and pregnancy rates have been reported with this phenomenon. Its pathogenesis is still poorly understood. One of the major reasons for the controversy has been the diverse definitions of P rise in literature.


25.2 Definition


In past, an absolute progesterone concentration on the day of HCG administration was taken as an indicator of progesterone elevation with arbitrarily set cut-off concentrations ranging from 0.8 to 2 ng/ml [37]. In recently published studies, using new methods for serum progesterone assessment, this cut-off concentration is usually set at 1.5 ng/ml [8]. This cut-off is supported by the presence of a marked difference in endometrial gene expression profile between patients with a progesterone serum concentration above and below the threshold of 1.5 ng/ml on the day of HCG administration [8, 9].

More follicles produce more serum P. It would, therefore, be better to take into account the ovarian response, rather than the serum P levels only. Progesterone >1.5 ng/mL and P/E(2) >0.55 affect the clinical pregnancy rate. P/E(2) ratio is the only independent prognosticator for cycle outcome [10].


25.3 Incidence


There is a marked variation in the incidence of premature rise of progesterone due to discrepancies in definition, population characteristics and/or treatment protocols among the studies. Although the frequency of elevated serum progesterone concentrations varies, incidences as high as 35 % of stimulated cycles in women treated with GnRH agonists [3, 6] and 38 % of cycles in women treated with GnRH antagonists [7, 11] have been reported. However, in a large retrospective analysis of over 4,000 cycles, the incidence of progesterone rise (above 1.5 ng/ml) on the day of HCG administration was estimated to be 8.4 % in agonist and antagonist cycles [12].


25.4 Pathogenesis


The pathogenesis of P elevation in COS is still poorly understood. But it has become certain that it is multi-factorial. Several hypotheses may be considered to explain this phenomenon:

1.

In GnRH agonist cycles, P elevation is a magnitude response to FSH rather than LH [12, 13]. P elevation is positively correlated with (a) high FSH daily doses and total FSH doses, (b) prolongation of follicular phase, e.g. in rFSH/GnRH antagonist cycle delaying hCG administration 2 days after presence of >3 follicles (>17 mm) [15], (c) high oestradiol concentrations, (d) increased steroidogenic activity, (e) increased number of retrieved ocytes, (f) increased number of follicles. In a study [14], patients with P >1.5 ng/ML were found to have high concentration of oestradiol and increased number of follicles [2].

 

2.

Increased follicular steroidogenic activity: An excessive amount of progesterone is produced by granulosa cells as part of early luteinization. In COS cycles, there are excess number of follicles, each one producing a normal amount of progesterone consistent with the late follicular phase [2]. Early increase in progesterone levels that result from an initial intense FSH stimulation leads to increased granulosa cell steroidogenic activity [11] (mature granulosa cell response to high FSH exposure).

 

3.

Increased follicular phase LH activity: No relationship exists between LH and progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase since the observed increases in progesterone were not accompanied by increases in LH [11].

 

4.

Serum accumulation of HCG from HMG [15]: A systematic review shows that providing LH activity supplementation in combination with FSH during ovarian stimulation does not have a consistent effect on serum progesterone concentrations at the time of hCG administration. However, these data also suggest that in accordance with physiological concepts, the timing of LH activity administration could influence the impact on serum progesterone level. Progesterone rise was even higher in recombinant FSH as compared with HMG ovarian stimulation [16, 17] supporting the fact that LH reduces progesterone level rather than contributing to progesterone rise. In a prospective study, LH rise was not found on the day of hCG stimulation in GnRH analogue cycles.

 

5.

Increased sensitivity of LH receptors of the granulosa cells to FSH: LH acts on granulosa cells when LH receptors have been induced by FSH at the later stage of follicular phase. In vitro experiments have clearly demonstrated that LH has a synergistic effect with FSH on granulosa cells to stimulate progesterone production [18, 19] and that LH is far more potent than FSH on granulosa cells to produce steroids as assessed by cAMP accumulation [19].

 

As the granulosa cells respond to FSH, proliferation and growth are associated with an increase in FSH receptors. The theca cells are characterized by steroidogenic activity in response to LH, converting pregnenolone into androgens. Aromatization of androgens to oestrogens is a distinct activity within the granulosa cell layer induced by FSH by activation of the P450 aromatase gene. Androgens produced in the theca layer diffuse into the granulosa layer, where they are converted to oestrogens that are released into the follicular fluid and from here into the peripheral circulation. Prior to ovulation, the granulosa cell layer is characterized by aromatization activity and conversion of theca androgens to oestrogens, an FSH-mediated response.

Factors that are associated with progesterone rise are the prolongation of the follicular phase (by delaying HCG administration) [20] and the oestradiol concentrations [14]. A study [20] reported that if the follicular phase is prolonged by 2 days after the presence of >3 follicles >17 mm is confirmed at ultrasound scan in recombinant FSH/GnRH antagonist stimulated cycles, a lower probability of ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected, probably through prolonged exposure of the endometrium to raised concentrations of progesterone. Hence, prolongation of stimulation is an important factor to be considered. Prolongation of follicular phase is related to the rise of oestradiol. Moreover, the rise in oestradiol concentration is associated with high risk of premature progesterone rise [21].

The adrenal is a secretory source of circulating progesterone during early follicular phase. This was demonstrated by the rapid rise of progesterone after administration of ACTH during suppression of endogenous gonadotropin secretion with triptorelin acetate. ACTH stimulates the conversion of cholesterol to pregnenolone in the adrenal cortex which is rapidly converted to progesterone. Moreover, it seems that the source of progesterone shifts towards the ovaries just prior to the ovulation [22].

Poor ovarian response with increased LH sensitivity. In poor ovarian responders, premature rise as defined by the P/E2 ratio was more prevalent. It was associated with poor ovarian response with increased LH sensitivity, similar to the report by Younis et al., who concluded that neither the LH nor the hCG content of the recombinant preparations is responsible for this elevation of P/E2 ratio level and suggested that P elevation is not necessarily an LH-dependent event and may be primarily related to an adversely affected cumulus–oocyte complex [23]. When considering P rise, ovarian response or reserve may be of critical importance [24]. The main factors associated with increased risk of progesterone rise during COS cycles are ovarian parameters, including the total FSH dose, the intensity of the ovarian response, and excess number of follicles or oocytes [15].

Recently emerging evidence points to the existence of an oocyte granulosa cell regulatory loop by which complementary signalling and metabolic pathways drive the development and function of both the oocytes and follicular somatic compartments [25, 26]. Growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) and bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15) are two well-characterized oocyte-derived growth factors that play crucial roles in follicle growth and ovulation in all mammalian species including humans [2529]. Spontaneous mutations or genetic targeting of either Gdf9 or Bmp15 in mammals affect fertility in females [30]. Disruption of signalling in the ovarian granulosa cells leads to their premature luteinization [31].


25.5 Impact


The impact of premature serum progesterone elevation at the end of the follicular phase under controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycle for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is still debated. While several studies reported lower pregnancy rates in patients with high progesterone concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration [6, 11, 12, 2932], one found a favourable effect on pregnancy outcome [33], and others failed to demonstrate any association [3, 4, 7].

No significant difference in pregnancy rate was observed by Hofman et al. [33] in patients undergoing IVF/embryo transfer with high or low progesterone concentrations on the day of HCG administration and in patients who received oocytes donated from women with high or low progesterone concentrations. On the contrary, other authors reported that pregnancy rate has been inversely related to serum progesterone levels on the day of HCG administration [3, 4, 6, 11]. The involved endocrinologic mechanism of such an observation, however, is unclear.

Adverse effects of elevated P levels on oocyte maturation, fertilization or early cleavage have been described [6, 11]. On the other hand, no negative impact of progesterone rise on oocyte/embryo quality could be found in several studies [2, 6, 34, 35]. Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Venetis C et al. showed that E2 levels (pg/mL) on the day of hCG administration were significantly higher in the group of patients that exhibited progesterone elevation on the day of hCG. No significant difference in the number of COCs retrieved was detected between the patients with and those without progesterone elevation on the day of hCG administration [2]. These findings suggest that P elevation may influence the endometrium, adversely affecting implantation and subsequent embryo development. Elevated progesterone levels might induce premature endometrial maturation and, as a consequence, earlier opening of the implantation window that leads to asynchronization of the crosstalk between embryo and endometrium. Accelerated endometrial maturation following COS has been clearly demonstrated by histological dating on the day of oocyte retrieval [8], but this is not the case during the implantation window [9]. When the endometrial receptivity was studied, findings pointed to an abnormally accelerated endometrial maturation but only during the pre-receptive secretory phase and not during the implantation window. Consequently, transfer of a day-3 embryo in such too precociously mature endometrium would not allow the proper establishment of the embryo-endometrium crosstalk; this might explain why the pregnancy outcome was impaired when embryo transfer was performed on day 3 (hCG + 5) in patients with high serum [P] on the day of hCG administration [36]. On the other hand, when embryo transfer was performed on day 5 (hCG + 7), no detrimental effect on the pregnancy outcome was observed. The deleterious effect of premature progesterone rise is probably not due to an impact on endometrial receptivity or ovarian parameters but rather to a desynchronized dialogue between embryo and endometrium. [37].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 8, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Premature Rise of Progesterone During Ovarian Stimulation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access