Fig. 11.1
Assessment and treatment of OCS in schizophrenia. Imminent or existing comorbidity with secondary OCS should be integrated into clinical management of all stages of schizophrenia, already beginning at the at-risk mental states (ARMS) for psychosis. Methods of level 1 (diagnostic assessment) may be helpful to differentiate between different clinical constellations and to define more or less homogeneous subgroups within the entire sample of patients with comorbid OCS (summarized at level 2). Therapeutic interventions (level 3) should fit each patient’s individual needs and be based on informed consent and shared decision-making. Every patient within the schizophrenia spectrum should receive an optimized antipsychotic treatment and CBT. Treatment-resistant psychotic symptoms always require CLZ treatment. Imminent or prevalent comorbid OCS lead to further steps of intervention as the arrows suggest, but individual conditions might change the order of steps (rounded headline arrows). Abbreviations: AMS amisulpride, APZ aripiprazole, ARMS at-risk mental state, FEP first episode of psychosis, fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging, OCS obsessive compulsive symptoms, SCH schizophrenia, ZIPR ziprasidone
11.2.2 Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Aside from efforts to optimize the antipsychotic monotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) should be considered as a core approach in the management of OCS in schizophrenia. With remarkably high effect sizes (Gava et al. 2007; CBT including exposure and response prevention (ERP) is the gold standard for treating primary OCD, with remarkably high effect sizes (Gava et al. 2007; Koran et al. 2007; Kuelz and Voderholzer 2011; Rosa-Akcazar et al. 2008). Based on these results and preliminary evidence from studies evaluating the effectiveness of CBT in comorbid schizophrenia patients it seems to be the appropriate treatment of first choice for some cases (for more details, see Chap. 12).
11.2.3 Polypharmacy
In the case of insufficient response to optimized monotherapy and/or CBT, polypharmacy may be considered as a last-resort option. Both augmentation and combination strategies adding additional psychotropic substances to the basic treatment regimen may be applied.
11.2.3.1 Augmentation Strategies
Antidepressive Substances
The observed responsivity of primary OCD to serotonergic antidepressants largely contributed to the serotonin hypothesis of OCD (Bandelow et al. 2008; Barr et al. 1992; Linden 2006; Nakao et al. 2005; Saxena et al. 1999, 2009). In consequence, SSRIs and SNRIs (serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor) have become an integral part of international treatment guidelines for OCD (Koran et al. 2007; Kordon et al. 2011). Based on the assumption of a pathophysiological overlap between primary OCD and secondary comorbid OCS observed in other psychiatric conditions, it seems plausible to modulate the serotonergic neurotransmission in order to attain symptom relief. The cumulative evidence for this approach (Hwang et al. 2009) within schizophrenia-spectrum disorders over the past decades is summarized in Table 11.1. Overall, augmentation strategies with antidepressants have been evaluated in N = 132 patients with schizophrenia and co-occurring OCS. However, the comparability is restricted by methodological reasons: While there are numerous single and multiple case reports, some trials also employed active (Reznik and Sirota 2000b; Sayeed Khan et al. 2004) or placebo (Berman et al. 1995) controlled conditions. In a three-armed trial, adding anti-obsessive antidepressants to FGA treatment was superior to the treatment with FGAs or SGAs alone (Sayeed Khan et al. 2004). In detail, the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine (Bark and Lindenmayer 1992; Berman et al. 1995; Kurokawa and Tanino 1997; Margetic et al. 2008; Poyurovsky and Weizman 1998; Zohar et al. 1993) and the following SSRIs have been examined: fluvoxamine (Gahr et al. 2014; Poyurovsky et al. 1999; Reznik and Sirota 2000a, b), sertraline (Hoehns et al. 2001; Poyurovsky et al. 2003), escitalopram (Stryjer et al. 2012) and fluoxetine (Kulkarni et al. 2012). Recently, beneficial effects of the SNRI milnacipran were reported (Hung and Hung 2014). The results of these trials were not entirely homogeneous but showed some overall positive tendencies despite the possibility of a publication bias. Several descriptive observations (de Haan et al. 1999) are also considered.
Table 11.1
Polypharmacy for OCS in schizophrenia: augmentation with antidepressants
Augmentation | Reference | Diagnosis/patient or sample characteristics | Procedures | Main findings/conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clomipramine | Bark and Lindenmayer (1992) | 1 SCH | Case report | No effect on OCS |
Zohar et al. (1993) | 3 SCH2 SAD | 3 patients: off-on-off design 2 patients: off-on-off-on design | Improvement of OCS, psychotic exacerbation (n = 1) | |
Kurokawa and Tanino (1997) | 2 male SCH | Case report (augmentation of haloperidol with clomipramine 30 or 75 mg/die) | Improvements of YBOCS from 16 to 8 and 20 to 9, respectively, in parallel with reduced BPRS | |
Poyurovsky and Weizman (1998) | 1 SCH | Case report, intravenous application of clomipramine | Improvement of OCS | |
Berman et al. (1995) | 6 SCH with OCS | Double-blind, randomized cross-over design with placebo | Significantly more improvement of PANSS and YBOCS scores during clomipramine treatment | |
Margetic et al. (2008) | 1 SCH | Add-on of clomipramine to fluphenazine, levomepromazine and clozapine | Psychotic exacerbation | |
Fluvoxamine | Poyurovsky et al. (1999) | 10 (5 males) SCH patients with YBOCS ≥7 | Open-label add-on of 150 mg/die fluvoxamine to antipsychotic agents | Significant improvement of obsessions, but not compulsions |
Reznik and Sirota (2000a) | 16 SCH | Open-label add-on of 100–200 mg/die fluvoxamine for 8 weeks | Significant improvement of psychotic symptoms (BPRS by −39.4 %) and OCS (Y-BOCS by −32.9 %) scores; no psychotic exacerbation, no relevant side effects | |
Reznik and Sirota (2000b) | 30 SCH (14: add-on of fluvoxamine, 16: no add-on) | RCT (8 weeks); add-on of 100–200 mg/die fluvoxamine to antipsychotic agents | Significant improvement of psychotic symptoms (PANSS: −34.3 %) and OCS (Y-BOCS: −29.4 %), no psychotic exacerbations, moderate decrease of CGI scores in both groups; mild and well-tolerated side effects | |
Gahr et al. (2014) | 1 SCH (female) | Case report, add-on of fluvoxamine to CLZ | Increase of CLZ serum levels via inhibition of CYP 1A2 und 2C19, induction of OCS/need for regular therapeutic drug monitoring | |
Sertraline | Hoehns et al. (2001) | 1 SCH (26-year-old male) without previous history of cardiovascular disease | Medication: CLZ 100 mg twice daily (started 4 y prior to his death), risperidone 3 mg twice daily, sertraline 200 mg once daily, atenolol 50 mg twice daily and lorazepam 0.5 mg four times daily | Sudden cardiac death because of acute cardiac arrhythmia. Autopsy and toxicology studies revealed single-vessel coronary artery disease and cardiomegaly suggestive of idiopathic cardiomyopathy. Sertraline and CLZ blood concentrations within the therapeutic range |
Poyurovsky et al. (2003) | 2 SCH (son treated with OLZ 20 mg/die, father with OLZ 7.5 mg/die) | After insufficient response to SRI or SSRIs, sertraline was added with 150 mg/die | Improvement of OCS in both patients/OLZ and sertraline seem to be a well-tolerated combination | |
Escitalopram | Stryjer et al. (2012) | 15 SCH | Open-label add-on of escitalopram 20 mg/die for 12 weeks | Significant improvement in YBOCS total score (obsessions and compulsions), improvement in PANSS positive and negative scores with particular improvements of the anxiety, tension, depression and preoccupation subitems |
Fluoxetine | Kulkarni et al. (2012) | 1 female SCH with OLZ-induced OCS | Add-on of fluoxetine 60 mg/die | Improvement of OCS, psychotic symptoms stably remitted |
Milnacipran | Hung and Hung (2014) | 1 male SCH with comorbid OCS | Switch from 30 mg escitalopram to 150 mg milnacipran (augmented to 15 mg aripiprazole) | Stable improvement of OCS from YBOCS total score 24–13 |
Broad classification of anti-obsessive substances | Sayeed Khan et al. (2004) | 39 SCH with comorbid OCD | Comparison of FGA plus ‘anti-obsessional substances’ versus FGA and SGA alone (comparison of three cohorts) | Better improvement of psychotic symptoms (PANSS) and OCS (Padua Inventory) during FGAs in combination with ‘anti-obsessional drugs’ compared with FGAs or SGAs alone |
Adding antidepressants in bipolar disorder (BD) (see also Sect. 11.2.3.2) bears the risk of inducing manic switches. In contrast, the risk of aggravating the primary psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia seems negligible: To date, there are only two publications reporting deteriorations of psychotic symptoms after the add-on of clomipramine (Margetic et al. 2008; Zohar et al. 1993). This is in line with the current perception that antidepressants and even pro-dopaminergic substances such as bupropion (Englisch et al. 2010a, b, 2013) may be applied for the treatment of NS in schizophrenia without jeopardizing the patients’ mental state, given they are on stable antipsychotic treatment.
Specific non-psychiatric safety concerns that need to be considered: One patient died from sudden cardiac arrest during polypharmacy with CLZ, RISP, sertraline and lorazepam (Hoehns et al. 2001). Adding pro-serotonergic antidepressants for OCS in schizophrenia renders some additional issues: (1) Clomipramine extends the anticholinergic profile of agents such as CLZ or OLZ and therefore may increase the risk of cardiovascular AEs. (2) SSRIs such as fluoxetine or fluvoxamine bear the potential of marked pharmacokinetic interactions within the cytochrome P450 system. This may result in a rise of antipsychotic serum levels which, in turn, might increase the antiserotonergic effects of CLZ and OLZ in particular and thus aggravate OCS.
Except for milnacipran, for SNRIs such as venlafaxine, duloxetine or vortioxetine, no systematic evaluations have been performed to date. As these agents bear the additional potential of enhancing neurocognition while the risk of pharmacokinetic interactions appears to be low, it will be important to systematically assess these multimodal antidepressants in order to improve the pharmacological treatment of OCS in schizophrenia.
Mood Stabilizers
Mood stabilizers (MS) such as lithium, valproic acid, carbamazepine, lamotrigine and topiramate are the treatment of choice for bipolar disorder and were also effective in reducing OCS secondary to BD (Abdel-Ahad and Kazour 2013). As recently summarized, they have also been used in primary OCD, both as a monotherapy or as an augmentation of non-selective and selective SRIs. The underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain speculative; however, they reach far beyond the serotonergic system. Lamotrigine, for instance, exerts its effects by modulating the glutamatergic neurotransmission (Poyurovsky et al. 2010).
Within the schizophrenia spectrum, the available data on MS is less conclusive (Citrome 2009; Tiihonen et al. 2009b; Zink et al. 2010): Recent meta-analyses on lithium (Leucht et al. 2007), valproic acid (Schwarz et al. 2008), carbamazepine (Leucht et al. 2014) and lamotrigine (Tiihonen et al. 2009b) were unable to confirm their therapeutic effects in schizophrenia. While they may be suited to treat specific conditions such as agitation, aggression or tardive dyskinesia, they are generally considered an off-label treatment for psychotic disorders. Further research is required in order to define their therapeutic effects in schizophrenia on a syndromal level which might also embrace comorbid OCS.
While there are no reports on pregabalin, lithium, topiramate and carbamazepine, descriptions of a small number of patients (N = 18) with low level of evidence suggest a relief of OCS in schizophrenia when SGAs are augmented with valproic acid (Aukst-Margetic et al. 2011; Bisol and Lara 2009; Canas et al. 2012; Suppes and Rush 1996; Zink et al. 2007) or lamotrigine (Poyurovsky et al. 2010; Rodriguez et al. 2010) (see Table 11.2). In addition to the small number of published cases, their narrative design and a putative publication bias pose further limitations. To date, no controlled trials have been performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of augmentation strategies with mood stabilizers for comorbid OCS in schizophrenia. In addition to investigating changes in psychopathological features, further research should also focus on pharmacokinetic interactions as well as additive AEs which may arise from polypharmacy.
Table 11.2
Polypharmacy for OCS: augmentation with mood stabilizers
Augmentation with: | Reference | Patient or sample characteristics | Procedure | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Valproic acid | Suppes and Rush (1996) | 27-year-old male SAD patient, CLZ-induced OCS; treatment resistant to sertraline 200 mg/die | Add-on of valproic acid; titration to trough serum levels ≥70 μg/L | Improvement of ritualistic and impulsive behaviour |
Zink et al. (2007) | 32-year-old male SCH patient, CLZ-aggravated OCS resistant to CBT and SSRI treatment | Add-on of 1,300 mg valproic acid and reduction of CLZ | Improvement of OCS severity from YBOCS total score 24 (at treatment initiation) to 6 (after 20 weeks of treatment) | |
Bisol and Lara (2009) | 36-year-old female and 31-year-old male with bipolar disorder | Combination of lamotrigine 100 mg/die + valproic acid 500 mg/die (female), monotherapy with valproic acid 1,000 mg/die (male) | Improvement of OCS [YBOCS improved from 46 to 4 (female) and 23 to 4 (male)] | |
Aukst-Margetic et al. (2011) | Male with bipolar disorder | Report on CLZ-induced suicidal obsessions due to increase of dosage from 150 to 300 mg | Improvement after change to CLZ (100 mg/die), quetiapine (600 mg/die) and sodium valproate (900 mg/die) | |
Canas et al. (2012) | 51-year-old male SCH patient, CLZ-induced OCS | Add-on of 1,000 mg valproic acid to 500 mg CLZ | Improvement of OCS | |
Lamotrigine | Poyurovsky et al. (2010) | 5 SCH/6 SAD patients with YBOCS ≥16 | Add-on of lamotrigine (200 mg/day) to antipsychotic agents | Improvement of OCS severity (decrease of YBOCS total score from 22.9 to 17.4), five responders (i.e. decrease in YBOCS scores by at least 35 %) |
Rodriguez et al. (2010) | 19-year-old SCH patient, coincident psychotic symptoms and OCS, treatment with CLZ | Resistance to clomipramine, SSRI, dropout from CBT. Add-on of lamotrigine 200 mg/day to CLZ 300 mg/day | Remission of psychosis and improvement of OCS (YBOCS) by about 40 % |
11.2.3.2 Combination Strategies
The combination of different antipsychotic agents aims at two major targets: (1) On a molecular level, combining substances with different modes of action can result in an amplification of both receptor profile and occupancy. This may facilitate a more complete response of hitherto treatment-resistant symptoms. (2) Instead of administering antipsychotic monotherapy in escalating doses and hence increasing the risk of substance-specific AEs, it may prove helpful to introduce a second agent. This strategy will help limit each substance’s maintenance dose and will thus reduce the burden of non-additive, substance-specific AEs. While both strategies primarily aim at a relief of otherwise treatment-refractory psychotic symptoms, they may also prove helpful for the treatment of OCS in schizophrenia.
Clozapine Combined with Other Antipsychotics
While there have been recent efforts to implement CLZ therapy earlier in the course of schizophrenia (Leucht et al. 2012; Remington et al. 2013), it is still considered a substance of last resort when other treatment options fail. Thus, patients receiving CLZ are usually the most severely affected, and they also carry the highest risk of developing second-onset OCS (see Chap. 10).
CLZ-treated patients have been in the focus of extensive research, and the evidence for an optimized CLZ treatment employing means of polypharmacy has been summarized in several recent reviews (Kane 2011; Nielsen et al. 2011; Zink et al. 2010). While switching to other SGAs in monotherapy could not be corroborated in clinical trials, it has been shown that CLZ-treated patients with second-onset OCS may benefit from combination strategies with other SGAs (see also Sect. 11.2.1).
As CLZ is a substance with weak antidopaminergic but prominent antiserotonergic properties, it has been proposed to add agents with mainly dopaminergic modes of action in order to counteract pro-obsessive effects inherent to CLZ. In particular, there is some evidence supporting the add-on of APZ (Chang et al. 2008; Englisch et al. 2009; Englisch and Zink 2008; Eryilmaz et al. 2013; Glick et al. 2009; Peters and de Haan 2009; Rocha and Hara 2006; Villari et al. 2011; Zink et al. 2006) and ZIPR (Krause et al. 2013). Based on theoretical considerations, the combination with AMS might also be beneficial (Kim et al. 2008) (see Table 11.3). With respect to these substances, the highest level of evidence exists for APZ, where positive effects have been reported in a number of cases and in one RCT (Chang et al. 2008). However, in general and as previously mentioned (compare sections “Antidepressive substances” and “Mood stabilizers”), the number of cases is limited and may be subject to publication biases. Therefore, conclusions should be drawn with caution.
Table 11.3
Polypharmacy for OCS in schizophrenia: combination strategies involving different antipsychotic agents
Combinations | Reference | Patient or sample characteristics | Procedure | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
CLZ and APZ | Rocha and Hara (2006) | 3 male SCH patients | Add-on of 15 mg APZ to CLZ | Improvement of OCS and dose reduction of CLZ |
Zink et al. (2006) | 1 male SCH patient (30 y), treated with 500 mg CLZ | Add-on of 30 mg APZ | Decrease of YBOCS total score from 24 to 16, dose reduction of CLZ to 250 mg/die | |
Glick et al. (2009) | 7 (6 male) SCH patients with YBOCS ≥16 | Add-on of APZ to pre-existing FGA or SGA treatment | Decrease of YBOCS total score by an average of 13 points | |
Chang et al. (2008) | 29 (22 male) SCH patients (RCT) in CLZ monotherapy | Add-on of 15.5 ± 7.1 mg APZ to 304.3 ± 104.8 CLZ | Decrease of YBOCS total scores from 14.5 to 12.0 points | |
Englisch et al. (2009) | 7 (6 male) SCH patients | Add-on of 22.9 mg APZ to CLZ | Decrease of YBOCS total scores from 18.7 to 12.4, overall CLZ dose reduction by 19.6 % | |
Peters and de Haan (2009) | 1 male SCH patient | Add-on of CLZ to APZ | Remission of psychotic symptoms and improvement of OCS | |
Villari et al. (2011) | 2 male SCH patients | Add-on of APZ to CLZ | Improvement of OCS | |
Eryilmaz et al. (2013) | 4 SCH with CLZ-associated OCS | Add-on of APZ | Improvement of OCS | |
CLZ and ZIPR | Krause et al. (2013) | 5 SCH (1 female, 44 y/4 males, 27–33 y) | Add-on of a mean dosage of 240 mg/die ZIPR to stable monotherapy with QTP up to 800 mg, clozapine up to 425 mg or flupentixol 15 mg | Improvement of OCS without marked side effects, no abnormal QTc prolongation |
OLZ and APZ
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |