Pediatric Pain Management

22 Pediatric Pain Management



Health care providers must be familiar with the assessment and effective management of pain in the pediatric and adolescent populations as many children undergo painful operative and diagnostic procedures. For example, in 2006 over 1.1 million circumcisions were performed on male newborns born in the United States (Buie et al, 2010). This procedure is associated with acute pain.


Pain results from injury or disease or as a side effect of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures or surgery. Preterm infants are a particularly vulnerable population who must undergo numerous painful procedures (Zeltzer and Krell, 2007). These early painful experiences are significant events, and pain studies document that unrelieved pain has negative physiological and psychological consequences. Early pain stimuli and experiences can produce long-term consequences for the child. It is thought that early and prolonged pain may affect the child’s pain systems, stress response and behavior, and learning resulting in increased pain sensitivity (Palermo and Zeltzer, 2009; Weisman et al, 1998; Zeltzer and Krell, 2007). Inadequate pain control during initial procedures can decrease the effectiveness of analgesia during subsequent procedures. Neonates and pediatric oncology patients who have inadequate analgesia experiences suffer long-standing alterations in their pain perceptions and later responses to painful procedures (Zempsky et al, 2004). Accordingly, best practice standards for pediatric care necessitate that pain management be part of all treatment plans, from minor painful procedures to more serious illness or injury. Therefore, all health care management plans should include the elimination of preventable pain and reduction of unpreventable pain.


The importance of effective pain management in children cannot be overemphasized. To this end, a joint statement was issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American Pain Society (APS) (2001) reinforcing the need for health care providers to treat pain and suffering in all infants, children, and adolescents. This statement continues to be a relevant document today. Also, that same year, The Joint Commission recognized pain as “the fifth vital sign” and established standards requiring the assessment of pain in all patients (Phillips, 2000).


The focus of this chapter is minor pain assessment and management in primary and emergency care settings. The pediatric provider should seek other references for more in-depth discussions of chronic pain treatment in pediatric patients.



image Pain in Children


Key factors that influence effective pain management in children include the following:



Established pain is difficult to control; therefore, essential goals of pain management are prevention of and quick action in response to pain.


Pediatric and adolescent patients and their families should be involved as much as possible in pain education—its assessment and management. Parents must be educated about their role in engaging and providing distraction and comfort to their child during and after painful procedures (e.g., needlesticks, ear examinations, vaccinations).


Culture and family learning patterns must be considered (e.g., beliefs about pain, folk remedies, how pain is expressed verbally, and language barriers).


Genetic stressors may be responsible for differing levels of neurotransmitters or medication responses.


Children’s pain perceptions are influenced by individual, physiological and psychological differences, memories, and prenatal and perinatal stressors.


Chronic pain is rarely associated with sympathetic nervous system arousal. Therefore children with chronic pain may not appear to be in pain. This may negatively affect their evaluation and treatment. To effectively treat chronic pain in children, physical and psychological manifestations of chronic pain must be considered.


Developmental issues (e.g., cognitive, emotional, and physical), age, and temperament significantly affect how pain is interpreted, expressed, and controlled. Therefore, pain management must be tailored to the child’s age and developmental level.


Cognitive issues that influence pain perception include the child’s memory and level of understanding, ability to control what will happen, attachment of meaning to a situation with regard to pain, and expectations of the intensity of pain.


Emotional issues that affect a child’s pain perception include anxiety, fear, frustration, anger, and depression.


Social issues, such as how others react to the child in pain, influence the treatment plan. Likewise, family harmony or conflict influences a child’s pain.


Pain perception involves complex neural interactions that send out impulses or noxious stimuli generated by tissue damage. Melzack and Wall’s gate control theory of pain (1965) explains the four processes necessary for pain to occur (Golianu et al, 2000; Wendel, 2009):






Health care provider’s fear of severe adverse events from pain medications, such as central nervous system and respiratory depression related to their use, often results in inadequate pain control (Kraemer and Rose, 2009).


For a variety of reasons (e.g., fear of getting a shot), some children do not report pain to health care providers.


The goal of acute pain management in pediatrics is to effectively control pain with minimal therapy and side effects. Positive outcomes of effective pain control are decreased suffering, increased satisfaction for the child and parents, an enhanced recovery process, and a positive script learned by the child related to pain and its management that can be used in the future. In some situations (e.g., after surgical procedures, severe burns, or with chronic pain issues), complete “freedom” from pain is not possible; however, much can be done to alleviate pain in these situations through the use of analgesic agents and other adjunctive therapies.




image Overview of Pain


Pain perception develops early in fetal life. By the end of the second week of gestation, fetal skin and mouth sensory neurons develop and these structures mark the foundations of neural pain transmission. At approximately 32 weeks of gestation, the beginning of the neuronal pain inhibiting mechanism appears and continues developing until the newborn period. It is postulated that newborns who are subjected to repetitive acute pain events experience central neural changes that program them to later pain vulnerability, cognitive effects, and opioid tolerance (Zeltzer and Krell, 2007).


Pain is an acute or chronic phenomenon. Acute pain often is associated with an identifiable injury that resolves in a predictable and expected time frame. Physiological changes in the nervous system are responsible for chronic pain that results from untreated or undertreated persistent acute pain. Factors not necessarily related to the initial cause of the pain may perpetuate it. Pain is further classified as nociceptive or neuropathic. Nociceptive pain is subdivided into two subcategories that describe the physiological structures associated with nociceptive pain—somatic and visceral. Somatic pain is well localized in skin and subcutaneous tissues but does not encompass bone, muscle, blood vessels, and connective tissue. Somatic pain is typically described as dull or aching. In contrast, visceral pain involves the internal organs of the body, is poorly localized, and is typically described as a continual aching sensation or a deep, crampy or sharp, squeezing pain. Visceral pain may result in referred pain that involves distant dermatomal or myotomal sites. The mechanisms associated with visceral pain include distention, stretching, compression and/or infiltration of an organ. Neuropathic pain is associated with injury to the peripheral nerves, spinal cord, or brain. This painful sensation is characterized as a shooting or stabbing pain that is superimposed on a backdrop of aching and burning. Key features are poor localization, paresthesias, and dysesthesia (Wendel, 2009).



image Pain Assessment


A systematic approach to the assessment of child and adolescent pain begins by obtaining a pain history from the child or the parent. When talking with younger children, ask the parent what words the child uses for pain (e.g., “owie,” “boo-boo,” “ouchie,” “hurting,” “uncomfortable,” “warm,” or “stinging”) and use these words with the child. Behavioral observations and physiological findings provide additional information to the comprehensive pain assessment. Pain evaluation in children needs to be multidimensional. The provider must collect data about what children say about their pain, assess for physiological and emotional manifestations of pain, and investigate other pertinent factors that contribute to the child’s pain as listed earlier.



Clinical Findings



History


A careful history is necessary and requires a systematic approach. An interval history and examination are needed when pain does not abate as expected or there is a change in quality, intensity, duration, or location. Pain has a sensory and emotional component. Because pain is a subjective phenomenon, it is measured best by self-report (Zeltzer and Krell, 2007). The following information should be obtained during pain assessment:



Pain history (symptom analysis)










Past pain experience, including the child’s memory of the painful experience and the pain treatment


Cultural beliefs about pain and its causes and treatment


Self-reports of pain in the verbal child (if possible obtain pain history as noted). Use age-appropriate language. The lower age limit for successful use of a self-report pain scale is generally 3 or 4 years old (Hicks et al, 2001; Wolraich et al, 2008; Wong and Baker, 1988). Between the ages of 3 and 7 years, children’s ability to describe the location, intensity, and quality of their pain increases. Introduction to the pain scale includes an explanation that this is one way for children to express how they hurt (Wolraich et al, 2008). Providers should select reliable, valid, sensitive, and easily understood instruments that can be used consistently. The use of self-report tools, patient pain journals, and other objective pain measures help quantify pain before treatment and serve to evaluate the outcome of treatment. Selected common pain scales are shown in Table 22-1.


Factors that influence self-report of pain include (Marie, 2009; Wolraich et al, 2008):






Children with developmental delays may have difficulty reporting pain, may be less precise in their communications, or may be unable to verbally communicate their pain. Their pain expressions may be less precise, resulting in slower reporting of pain (Wolraich et al, 2008). However, if self-report is possible, it is always preferred over observational tools.




Few scales are valid for intubated children. However, some intubated children are still able to self-report by using a faces pain tool, writing notes, and so on.




TABLE 22-1 Common Pain Rating Scales Used to Measure Pain in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients


















Pain Scale/Description Instructions Recommended Age/Comments
FACES Pain Rating Scale (Wong, 1996; Wong and Baker, 1988): Consists of six cartoon faces ranging from smiling face for “no pain” to tearful face for “worst pain.”

Oucher scale (Beyer, 1989): Consists of six photographs of child’s face representing “no hurt” to “biggest hurt you could ever have”; also includes a vertical scale with numbers from 1 to 100; scales for African-American and Hispanic children have been developed (Villarruel and Denyes, 1991). Numeric scale:

Poker chip tool (Hester et al, 1989): Uses four red poker chips placed horizontally in front of the child.
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Pediatric Pain Management

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access