Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors

and Daniela Cristina Stefan2



(1)
Université Mohammed VI des Sciences de la Santé Cheikh Khalifa Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco

(2)
South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa

 





Objectives



  • To learn about the clinical presentation of the main malignancies of soft tissues in children and in particular the rhabdomyosarcoma.


  • To be able to diagnose the tumors of soft tissues.


  • To know the prognosis of malignancies of soft tissue.


  • To learn about the principles of the treatment of soft tissue tumors and in particular of rhabdomyosarcoma.


Image



A320195_1_En_13_Figa_HTML.jpg

Child 5 years old with swelling of the left lower limb

Fatima, 5 years old, is admitted for a swelling of the left lower limb gradually installed over 2 months and the recent finding of a left inguinal mass. On examination, a functional impairment of the left lower limb is found; the edema is soft and pitting. The inguinal mass has a firm consistency, is fixed, painless, and measures 5 × 3 cm. Ultrasound and CT show a mass in the iliac and inguinal areas on the left, of 12 × 7 cm. The biopsy of the inguinal mass indicates a rhabdomyosarcoma of the alveolar type.



  • What complementary assessment do you propose?


  • What is the prognosis in this case?


  • What strategy of management would you adopt?

Malignant soft tissue tumors are heterogeneous entities whose origin is the mesenchyme. They often have a high potential of local relapse and of blood-borne metastases. Rhabdomyosarcoma is distinguished by its frequency and its particular response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.


Rhabdomyosarcoma


The rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most frequently encountered soft tissue tumor . The modern multidisciplinary approach allows for a better characterization of the different entities and for tailoring the treatment accordingly.


Epidemiology


This is a tumor of striated muscle that represents nearly 50 % of soft tissue tumors in children and 10–12 % of childhood cancers. The average age of onset is 6 years. However, the RMS of the limbs are more often encountered in adolescence and are mostly of alveolar type, while head and neck locations are rather embryonic and occur with greater frequency in infants and small children.

A genetic predisposition is reported in the context of neurofibromatosis and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. In the latter, there is a mutation in the suppressor gene p53. The RMS can also be associated with the syndrome Beckwith-Wiedemann with a chromosomal abnormality at the level of the 11p15 region. The RMS is also common as part of the syndrome of Castello. Finally, the consumption of marijuana or cocaine by the mother and also by the father seems to increase the risk of development of a RMS.


Anatomical Pathology


The RMS is included among the round cell tumors. The diagnosis and its classification are usually possible by optical microscopy studying the tumor cells and tissue architecture. It may be necessary to resort to immuno-histochemistry to look for muscle markers: actin, myosin, desmin, and myoglobin. The expression of myogenin is also common.

The embryonic type represents almost two-thirds of cases. It takes the appearance of fetal muscle at 7–10 weeks of pregnancy with a rich stroma and fusiform, non-alveolar cells. The preferential location of the embryonic type is the head and neck and genitourinary apparatus. Two variants of this type are described, the botryoidal form and the fuso-cellular form. In the botryoidal form, the proliferation has a polypoid aspect with a sub-epithelial layer of dense tumor cells (cambial layer). The location in this case is naso-pharyngeal, vaginal, or in the urinary bladder, while in the fuso-cellular type, the preferred location is para-testiculaire.

In the alveolar type , representing almost 25 % of the cases, round tumor cells are densely grouped within an architecture resembling the pulmonary alveoli. A variant is described known as “alveolar solid”, in which the alveolar architectural organization is not found, but the genetic study connects it to the alveolar RMS. The usual locations of the RMS of alveolar type are the extremities, trunk, and the perineum.

Undifferentiated sarcoma is made of round cells whose morphological appearance, architecture, and antigenic markers expressions do not classify it. It is a diagnosis of exclusion.


Genetic Abnormalities


Genetic studies allow us to better characterize the RMS. Thus, the translocation t(2; 13) (q35; q14) is characteristic of the alveolar RMS. This translocation leads to the juxtaposition of the PAX3 gene involved in neuromuscular differentiation and FKHR (or FOXO1a) gene. Testing by PCR, the merging of PAX3 and FKHR genes is very sensitive for the identification of alveolar RMS. Embryonic RMS cases have a recurring loss of heterozygosity 11p15. In addition, the ploidy assessment by flow cytometry shows that hyperdiploidy (>51 chromosomes) has a better prognosis than the diploidy.


Clinical Signs


The clinical presentation varies according to the anatomical location (Table 13.1). It’s usually an asymptomatic mass sometimes associated with organ dysfunction related to the location of the tumor. Initial metastases, mainly to the lung, have no clinical signs.


Table 13.1
Clinical signs of rhabdomyosarcoma based on location




























































































Location

Clinical signs

Head and neck

Neck

Mass of the soft parts

Dysphonia

Dysphagia

Nasopharynx

Sinusitis

Pain

Epistaxis

Dysphagia

Para-nasal sinus

Sinusitis

Unilateral rhinorrhea

Pain

Epistaxis

Middle ear

Otitis media

Polyp of the ear canal

Facial paralysis

Orbit

Exophthalmos

Strabismus

Oculo-motor paralysis

Conjunctival mass

Genitourinary

Vagina-uterus

Vaginal bleeding

Mass like “bunch of grapes”

Prostate

Dysuria, urinary retention

Hematuria

Bladder

Retention of urine

Hematuria

Repeated urinary infection

Para-testicular

Painless para-testicular mass

Limbs
 
Asymptomatic mass

Retroperitoneal
 
Abdominal pain

Abdominal mass

Bowel obstruction

Pelvis
 
Constipation

Genitourinary obstruction

In almost 40 % of the cases, the tumor involves the head and neck. The distinct locations are orbital, para-meningeal (nasopharynx, middle ear, para-nasal sinuses, the temporal and pterygo-maxillary fossae), and others (larynx, oropharynx, oral cavity, parotid, cheek, scalp). The orbital location is usually rapidly diagnosed due to the exophthalmos. Metastases are rare in this location. In the para-meningeal locations, patients present with signs of oral or nasal obstruction or symptoms related to the ears. Headache, vomiting, or paralysis of one or more cranial nerve pairs already reflect a brain invasion by infiltration of the base of the skull. In other locations, the tumor often remains localized .

Genitourinary localization is dominated by bladder and prostate lesions. The tumor is usually of the embryonic botryoidal type and develops at the trigone. Its clinical expression is often noisy in the form of a dysuria or retention of urine or acute hematuria and more rarely as a pelvic mass. Sometimes muco-sanguinolent fragments of tumor are eliminated in urine. Vaginal or uterine tumors are usually botryoidal and also manifested themselves by elimination of tumor fragments. The para-testicular RMS appears as a painless scrotal or inguinal mass.

RMS of the members and the trunk is usually a non-inflammatory painless mass increasing in volume. A history of trauma may be found, evoking a hematoma. In some cases with rapid evolution, the tumor may be painful or present signs of inflammation that suggest an abscess. These tumors are often of the alveolar type and have a tendency to locoregional and distant extension .

The other locations are rare and often diagnosed late. The RMS can be retro-peritoneal, intrathoracic, hepatic, perianal, and even more rarely in the biliary tract, brain, breast, ovaries, or the heart. Cases of metastatic RMS whose primary tumor was not found were also reported .


Diagnosis and Assessment of Extension


The strategy varies depending on location. As soon as the diagnosis is suspected, a biopsy or excisional biopsy should be envisaged. In cases of cavitary tumors, the pathological examination of tumor fragments, either eliminated or obtained by endoscopy, enables the diagnosis. Any suspicious lymphadenopathy should be biopsied to specify its nature.

Particular care must be given to the clinical evaluation, indicating the tumor mass and clinical signs of metastases particularly in the regional lymph nodes. In the head and neck location, it is recommended to do a specialist ENT consultation and possibly an ophthalmic examination. Radiological examinations are required for a proper assessment of the tumor mass and search for metastasis. This assessment will allow monitoring of response to treatment and a better definition of the tumor mass for a possible local treatment by surgery or radiotherapy. Echography is a good first approach, but in the majority of cases a CT scan is necessary. MRI is a better choice in the locations of the head and neck, at the level of the limbs, and in the case of pelvic tumors. The search for lung metastases is done by radiographs and especially by the CT scan. The 99Tc scintigraphy is very sensitive in the search for bone metastases. The place of the PET scan in the initial assessment and to monitor the response to treatment is a subject of study. Although isolated metastases in the bone marrow are exceptional, it is recommended to do this research by myelogram and bilateral bone marrow biopsy even when the blood count is normal.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 26, 2017 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access