Chapter 668 Leg-Length Discrepancy

Leg-length discrepancy (LLD), or anisomelia, in children can result from a variety of congenital or acquired conditions (see Table 668-1 on the Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics website at www.expertconsult.com ). Congenital conditions include asymmetrical growth from hemihypertrophy, vascular and lymphatic anomalies, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, hemiatrophy, bone dysplasias (proximal femoral focal deficiency [PFFD]), fibular and tibial hemimelia (see Fig. 668-1 on the Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics website at www.expertconsult.com ), and Proteus syndrome. Associated acquired causes of limb length inequality include physeal fractures, infections involving the growth plate, fractures whose healing process stimulates growth, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, and coxa vara. Neurologic diseases including spina bifida, cerebral palsy, head injury, and spinal dysraphisms, can also lead to LLD. These etiologies lead to structural limb length discrepancies, but soft tissue contractures of the lower extremity can also cause functional limb discrepancies even though the bones are of symmetrical length. Hip dysplasia can cause apparent limb length inequality of a functional type.

Figure 668-1 Anteroposterior radiograph of fibular hemimelia with leg-length discrepancy.

Nearly a quarter of Americans have a difference of >1 cm, which is usually of no clinical significance. A much smaller percentage have >2 cm difference, which may be clinically significant. The main sequelae observed with this condition are posture inequality and gait asymmetry, along with potential pain in the low back, high side hip, knee, or ankle areas. Posture inequality results in the shoulder shifting toward the shorter side of the body, potentially leading to compensatory or functional scoliosis. Gait asymmetry results in obvious limping and toe walking, which can lead to the knee becoming chronically hyperextended on the short side as compared to being flexed on the long side. Attempts to compensate for this include bending the longer leg, standing on the toe of the shorter leg, or stepping down on one side and thrusting upward on the contralateral side. Such compensation causes much fatigue and requires additional energy during regular ambulation. Knowledge of the underlying etiology and coexisting abnormalities in the viscera or musculoskeletal system, combined with regular follow-up assessments of limb growth and skeletal maturity, allows the treating clinician to predict the length discrepancy at skeletal maturity and to plan future treatment.

Diagnosis and Clinical Findings

A diagnosis of leg-length inequality can be made by a pediatrician at a regular visit in infancy or early childhood or by a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon at a referral for an obvious limp in an older child. The initial diagnosis of LLD is made on physical examination, with gait asymmetry being the most common complaint. The traditional measurements of real and apparent leg-length inequality (measuring with a tape measure from the medial malleolus to the umbilicus or iliac crest) have led to inaccurate measurements. A more reliable method of clinically testing for limb length inequality is simple visual assessment of the posterior iliac crest level while the child is standing with his or her knees and hips in an extended fashion. Blocks of various sizes can then be placed under the short limb until the pelvis is level to give an estimate of the leg-length inequality (Fig. 668-2). Physical examination can also identify joint contractures and angular deformities that cause errors in clinical and radiologic measurements.

Figure 668-2 Physical examination using blocks under the short leg until the pelvis is perfectly squared.

Radiographic Evaluation

Coupled with clinical examination, radiologic evaluation is used to guide the appropriate treatment decisions. Four different techniques are the most commonly used (Fig. 668-3): teleoroentgenogram, orthoroentgenogram, scanogram, and CT. Whichever method is initially used should remain consistent in all future studies in order to maximize accuracy and validity.

Figure 668-3 A, Teloroentgenogram. B, Scanogram. C, Orthoroentgenogram. D, CT length study.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Related posts:

1. History and Physical Examination
2. Pulmonary Embolism, Infarction, and Hemorrhage
3. Diseases of the Neonate
4. Tumors of the Skin

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join