Laparoscopic Approach to Pelvic Organ Prolapse



Fig. 16.1
Suturing mesh to vaginal apex



A304172_1_En_16_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 16.2
Opening peritoneum over the sacral promontory


A304172_1_En_16_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 16.3
Fastening the mesh to the sacral promontory with tacks


A304172_1_En_16_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 16.4
End of the procedure with mesh covered by peritoneum






16.4 Urinary Tract Considerations


Cystoscopy should be routinely performed in pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery to ensure excellent ureteral flow at the end of surgery. However, cystoscopy is not a perfect indicator of bladder injury; a reassuring cystoscopy does not guarantee the absence of bladder injury, especially in the case of thermal injury. The possibility of injury must not be ruled out if symptoms present postoperatively. Isolation of the ureters prior to initiating any energy sources as well as maintaining direct visualization throughout the procedure are key factors in avoiding bladder injury (Jabs and Drutz 2001).


16.5 Postoperative Management


Postoperatively, the majority of patients have an uneventful recovery. Following laparoscopic prolapse repair, patients receive nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications along with narcotics by mouth as needed. They are generally ready for discharge the following morning. A vaginal pack may be placed over night and a Foley catheter left in place until the following morning. It is good practice to perform a voiding trial the morning after surgery prior to discharge as there is a small risk of urinary retention in these patients. It is important to remain vigilant for possible urinary tract injuries and mesh-related complications. Complications resulting from mesh use may present as fever, infection, dyspareunia, and chronic bloody vaginal discharge, and exposed mesh may be visible if erosion has taken place.


16.6 Conclusions


Laparoscopic treatment of pelvic organ prolapse is a viable option for patients desiring minimally invasive surgical management of their symptoms while also achieving optimal long-term results. More research is needed to better determine the surgical procedures and techniques of choice for various clinical scenarios.


References



Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Statistical evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15(4):1070–1072PubMedCrossRef


Bensinger G, Lind L, Lesser M et al (2005) Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(6):2094–2098


Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17PubMedCrossRef


Committee on Gynecologic Practice (2011) Committee opinion no. 513: vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 118(6):1459–1464CrossRef


Diwan A, Rardin CR, Strohsnitter WC et al (2006) Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(1):79–83PubMedCrossRef

Sep 20, 2016 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Laparoscopic Approach to Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access