Fig. 33.1
Design of the REACH study in pediatric Crohn disease
Post hoc analyses of the REACH study evaluated the effect of infliximab in children with perianal CD. Seventy percent of children with signs and symptoms of perianal CD will have a clinical response when treated with standard induction regimen follow by 1 year [41].
Restoration of Height with Infliximab in Pediatric CD
Impaired linear growth is a common complication of CD in children. There are multiple reasons for this. Cytokines released from the inflamed intestine may directly inhibit and limit growth through interference with insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1). Chronic nutritional deficiencies may also limit growth and medications, particularly corticosteroids are associated with growth inhibition. Therefore, restoration or maintenance of growth is a marker of therapeutic success.
A number of studies, including REACH, have reported beneficial effects of infliximab in restoring growth and height in children with CD, as early as 6 months after start of therapy [35,36,41]. An important finding is that weight and height gain are significantly higher in patients on systematic re-treatment than in those treated only with three baseline infusions of infliximab [34]. The effect of infliximab therapy on linear growth was a specific endpoint in the REACH study [41]. Linear growth was measured and prospectively recorded and height but also height velocity (cm/year) was recorded at predefined time points. When looking only at the subgroup of 38 patients with at least 1 year delay in bone age (measured by wrist X-ray) at the start of the trial, the mean height status Z score significantly improved from −1.5 to +0.3 from week 0 to week 30 (p < 0.001) and to +0.5 at week 54 (p < 0.001) in the combined infliximab groups. The benefit was greater in the children randomized to the q8 weekly treatment arm (43.5% improvement in Z score by at least 0.5 standard deviation) in contrast to the children randomized to the q12 treatment arm (20% improvement in Z score by at least 0.5 standard deviation). Three factors are potentially contributing to the observed short-term increase in bone formation markers: reversal of TNT-α effect on bone growth, decreases in corticosteroid doses as disease activity improves and increases in linear growth [42]. A study done by Pfefferkorn et al. showed in a large study population of 176 children with CD (and tanner score I to III) a marked clinical improvement of growth during the first 1–2 years of therapy but growth abnormalities persists in many children. Additional strategies to improve the growth outcome are needed [43].
Corticosteroid Withdrawal with Infliximab
Although corticosteroids are an effective short-term therapy to control active inflammation, they do not maintain remission on long-term basis and are associated with serious side effects. Infliximab is steroid-sparing as clearly demonstrated in the adult ACCENT I and II studies. There are also data from pediatric CD that infliximab therapy allows children to wean and completely stop steroids. A retrospective study by Stephens et al. of 432 infusions administered to 82 patients showed that 57.6% of children taking corticosteroids (n = 33) at the start of infliximab became independent and remained free of corticosteroids [44]. Lamireau et al. looked at the outcome of 88 children and adolescents receiving infliximab (39 girls and 49 boys), median age 14 years (range 3.3–17.9) [32]. Infliximab was indicated for active disease (66%) and/or fistulas (42%) which were refractory to corticosteroids (70%), and/or other immunosuppressive (82%) agents, and/or parenteral nutrition (20%). Patients received 1–17 infusions (median 4) of 5 mg/kg of infliximab during a median time period of 4 months (range 1–17 months). At month 3, 78% of patients had a response (49%) or remission (29%). The dosage of corticosteroids decreased from 0.59 mg/kg/day before to 0.17 mg/kg/day 3 months after infliximab (p < 0.001) and 53% of patients could be weaned off corticosteroids and 92% off parenteral nutrition. A more recent prospective multicenter study looked at the 3-month and 1-year outcomes of children with CD treated with corticosteroids within 30 days of diagnosis, and investigated the influence of infliximab on steroid withdrawal [45]. Although at 3 months, 84% of children had a complete (60%) or partial (24%) response, at 1 year and despite concomitant immunomodulators, 31% of children were corticosteroid dependent and 8% required surgery. The authors demonstrated that infliximab improved the outcomes of corticosteroid-dependent/resistant patients since 16/24 (67%) patients who were corticosteroid resistant or dependent could discontinue their corticosteroids after starting infliximab therapy. Also, the REACH study showed that infliximab is allowing patients to decrease their dose of corticosteroids. The proportion of patients in the REACH study who, at week 54 were in remission and off steroids was higher in the q8 weeks arm (46%) as compared to the q12 weeks arm (17%). Punati et al. showed that 80% of children with newly diagnosed CD (moderate to severe) are treated with immunomodulators within 1 year. This early use is associated with reduced corticosteroid exposure and fewer hospitalizations per patient [46].
Data in Pediatric CD Show Evidence in Favor of Early Therapy
It is clear that altering the natural history of IBD will not merely be achieved by mucosal healing alone. The time of initiation of therapy will be of crucial importance if one takes into consideration that longer disease duration inevitably leads to more irreversible damage. When comparing the initial response rates from REACH study with those of the adult ACCENT studies, the superior response in children is noted. The reasons for this can be multiple. In the REACH study, the median disease duration was 1.6 years as compared to 7.9 years in ACCENT 1 and 12.3 years in ACCENT 2. There is evidence from previous pediatric studies in CD that more aggressive treatment early in the disease is associated with better response and remission rates. In an Italian study, the best response to infliximab was observed in children with a disease duration of less than 1 year and 5/6 children with early CD had complete closure of all fistulas following therapy as compared to only two out of seven children with a disease duration of more than 1 year [47]. A longer sustained remission in children with early CD was also the conclusion of the study by Kugathasan et al. [30]. However, in the REACH study, the clinical response rate of patients with early disease <1 year was equal to the response observed in patients with disease duration of more than 1 year. It is therefore possible that children in general respond better than adults. A better response of children to medication is a phenomenon which is known and which is possibly related to a more active adaptive and innate immune system in children. There is an immune senescence in humans, explained by a reduction in the synthesis and release of hormones or neurotransmitters, alterations in the number, density and affinity of receptors and diminished receptor responsiveness [48]. Another reason for the high response rates in the REACH study is the fact that 98% were on concomitant immunomodulators and this is much higher than what was observed in the adult population of ACCENT 1 (29%) and ACCENT 2 (37%). Again, concomitant use of immunomodulators improves clinical efficacy of infliximab in adults [49–52].
The benefit of early therapy with infliximab has been investigated in a Benelux study in adult CD [53]. In this study, patients with early onset CD were randomized to the classical treatment algorithm which includes first induction of remission with corticosteroids, followed by repeat course of steroids and azathioprine in case of new flares, and eventually infliximab if active disease under immunomodulator therapy, or a more aggressive first-line treatment where a three-course induction therapy with infliximab together with azathioprine was initiated. Two years following randomization, complete mucosal healing was observed in 75% in the Top Down group, compared to only 21% in the Step-Up treatment. A similar Top-Down approach was presented by Romeo et al. in pediatric CD patients [54]. In this retrospective study of 32 children with newly-diagnosed active ileocaecal CD, 13 patients received infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0–2–6 (Group A = 13 patients) and 19 patients (Group B) received the traditional treatment regimens for induction, together with maintenance therapy with azathioprine. The clinical relapse at 1 year was much higher in Group B (17/19) as compared to group A (1/13; p < 0.01) with also significant lower Crohn’s disease Endoscopic Index of Severity at one year in Group A (Top–Down group). Kim et al. evaluated in a small group of CD patients the Top–Down and Step-Up strategies and concluded that Top–Down therapy resulted in superior outcomes when compared with Step-Up strategy for inducing and maintain remission at 8 weeks and 1 year posttreatment [55].
Does Infliximab Reduce the Number of Surgeries in Pediatric CD?
The cumulative incidence of surgery 10 years after diagnosis in CD ranges from 40 to 70% in adults. The ACCENT studies showed that infliximab reduces the number of surgeries. In a large pediatric cohort of 989 CD patients (age 0–17 years at diagnosis), collected from six different pediatric centers, 13% of children needed intestinal resection already after a median of 2.8 years, a number which increased to 17% at 5 years and 28% at 10 years from diagnosis [56]. The treatment with infliximab in this cohort was associated with a 64% reduced risk for surgery. Schaffer et al. examined the contemporary incidence of CD-related surgery in a multicenter cohort of 854 children. The predominant site of occurrence of requiring bowel resection is the terminal ileum and cecum (43–55%), with less frequent occurrence of the colon (34%). They found no evidence that the early use of immunomodulators is a factor in the 5-year surgical outcomes. Disease at the transverse colon and rectum was associated with a significant decreased risk for surgery [57].
Ulcerative Colitis
Infliximab for Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis
Previously, CD was always seen as a typical Th1-driven disease with high levels of interferon-γ (INF), TNFα, and IL-12 and UC as a Th2-driven disease. However, this has been questioned as also INF-γ and TNFα are abundantly present in UC patients. The results of open studies and the first small randomized-trials with infliximab in adult patients with UC were conflicting and the definitive evidence for the efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of UC was provided by the large Active UC trials [58]. In 2005 these randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (ACT 1 and ACT 2) showed superiority of infliximab to placebo in inducing and maintaining remission in adults with UC who were currently unresponsive to varying regimens of 5-aminosalicylates, CS, and thiopurine immunomodulators [58].
Until recently the use of infliximab in children with UC had only been described in single-center reports with small patient samples and short follow-up. In 2010, Hyams et al. reported in a prospective multicenter cohort study, clinical outcomes of 52 infliximab-treated pediatric patients with UC treated according to local clinical practice. Sixty three percent of those children were CS refractory and 35% were CS dependent. The majority of patients were receiving 5-aminosalicylates (51%), CS (87%), and immunomodulators (63%) at infliximab therapy initiation, a pattern similar to the patients described in ACT 1. CS-free inactive disease was noted in 38% and 21% at 12 months and 24 months, respectively, and mild disease without CS was seen in an additional 11% after 24 months [59]. In the prospective multicenter Outcome of Steroid Therapy in Colitis Individuals study, 29% of 128 children hospitalized with acute severe colitis, failed to respond to CS therapy and required salvage therapy. Of the CS-refractory patients receiving infliximab, 55% had a sustained response during 1 year of follow-up [60]. In 2012, Hyams et al. evaluated 60 children with moderate to severe UC who had not responded to or tolerated conventional treatment. They were given infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6. At week 8, infliximab induced a clinical response in 73% of patients and among responders twice as many were in remission at week 54 after infliximab given every 8 weeks (38%) or every 12 weeks (18%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Mucosal healing at week 8 was achieved in more than two-thirds of pediatric UC patients [61]. Positivity for antinuclear cytoplasmatic antibody (pANCA) was found predictive of a lower likelihood of response to infliximab in one report of adult patients. In the cohort study of Hyams et al. from 2010, the pANCA status did not appear to affect the likelihood of responding, but the numbers of patients with pANCA determination in the study were small [59].
As conclusion, infliximab can be used as an induction and as maintenance therapy in children with moderate to severe UC and has a role for both CS-refractory and CS-dependent patients.
Does Infliximab Reduce the Number of Surgeries in Pediatric UC?
The colectomy rates following infliximab in UC patients as endpoint is important, as this could show the major advance of infliximab over older therapies as cyclosporine. In a first investigator-initiated study by Jarnerot et al., infliximab was given as rescue therapy to avoid colectomy in severely active UC patients, necessitating hospitalization and IV steroid treatment [62]. Seventy-one percent of patients resistant to steroids escaped colectomy at 3 months when treated with a single infusion of infliximab 5 mg/kg vs. 33% of the patients treated with placebo. In the report of Hyams in 2010, 72 and 61% of the infliximab treated pediatric patients with UC had avoided colectomy at 12 months and 24 months, respectively, and for those receiving continuous medication therapies (a set schedule after a 3-dose induction); the likelihood to avoid colectomy was 84% and 74%, respectively. It is currently unknown if this effect is maintained long-term [59].
Side Effects and Safety Profile of Infliximab
Immunogenicity and Autoimmunity
One of the most common problems of infliximab includes its chimeric properties and the formation of antibodies (ATI) to the murine portion of the drug. These ATIs are neutralizing and interfere with the safety and efficacy of the drug. ATIs can be associated with acute infusion reactions and loss of response and with delayed hypersensitivity phenomena. Although infusion reactions occur more commonly in the presence of ATIs, they occur in its absence and a lot of patients with ATIs do not have infusion reactions.
Acute infusion reactions are manifested by shortness of breath, chest pain, palpitations, flushing, headache, urticaria, and hypotension. These reactions are often easily controlled by slowing down (in case of mild) or temporarily stopping (in case of severe) the infusion, followed by administration of antihistamines and/or hydrocortisone. Future infusions are best given with prophylactic hydrocortisone. Delayed infusion reactions or serum sickness-like reactions occur typically 4–9 days after an infusion and are characterized by arthralgia (which often include jaw claudication), back pain, myalgia, fever, skin rash, and leukocytosis. This type of allergic reaction is rare (0–3%) but needs more aggressive therapy with 5 days of oral corticosteroids administered around the infusions (2–3 days before and after). In most cases however, patients will benefit from switching to humanized anti-TNF. The adult study of Baert et al. demonstrated that the formation of ATIs may be suppressed by concomitant therapy with immunosuppressants [63]. Pretreatment with hydrocortisone has also shown to suppress ATI formation [63], but the most efficacious way to prevent immunogenicity is a systematic therapy as opposed to episodic therapy [64].
The prevalence of acute infusion reactions varies greatly between studies depending on the sample size, the dosing regimen (episodic or maintenance), and concomitant therapies, but ranges in most studies between 15 and 20%. In the REACH study, 18 children (16.1%) evenly distributed among both treatment arms, developed infusion reactions and one patient had an anaphylaxis in the q8 week treatment arm. There were no delayed type hypersensitivity reactions observed [37]. In a large single center safety study by Friesen et al., the authors performed a retrospective review of 594 infliximab infusions administered to 111 IBD patients at the Children’s Mercy Hospital and Clinics in Kansas City [65]. Infusion reactions occurred in 8.1% of patients (seven early and two delayed), representing 1.5% of all infusions. Infusion reactions occurred more frequently in female patients (14% vs. 2%) but all were mild and responded rapidly to treatment. In the report of Turner et al. of 33 children with severe UC, 9% had an infusion reaction with discontinuation of therapy in 6% [60]. Of the 60 children with moderate to severe UC evaluated in the study of Hyams in 2012, infusion reactions were documented in 1 of 15 (6.7%) nonrandomized patients, 4 of 22 (18.2%) patients receiving infliximab q8w, and 3 of 23 (13.0%) patients receiving infliximab q12w. Overall, 17 of 340 (5.0%) infusions were associated with an infusion reaction: 1 of 40 (2.5%) nonrandomized patients, 13 of 165 (7.9%) patients receiving infliximab q8w, and 3 of 135 (2.2%) patients receiving infliximab q12w. There were no new reports of autoimmune disease, possible delayed hypersensitivity reactions, or anaphylactic reactions through week 54. One patient receiving infliximab q8w experienced a serious adverse event of lupus erythematous syndrome after week 54 [61].
In a large long-term follow-up study of Fidder et al. of adult patients with IBD, a total of 115 of 682 patients (17%) experienced acute infusion reactions after a median of two infusions and required discontinuation of treatment in 2,3% of the patients. This is in agreement with the discontinuation rate of 3% in combined safety date from other clinical trials. Induction therapy, scheduled maintenance therapy, and concomitant azathioprine therapy were independent protective factors for the occurrence of acute infusion reactions. In two patients the acute reaction necessitated hospital admission and was defined as a serious adverse event. In 7% of patients a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction was seen and in 92% of these patients infliximab was eventually discontinued, either because of the delayed-type reaction itself, loss of response, or a combination of the two. Serum sickness-like disease occurred more frequently in women than in men (9% vs. 4%). Delayed systemic reactions are associated with episodic infliximab treatment and long treatment intervals. Also, an induction series of three infusions at the start of treatment reduced the incidence of delayed reactions. So similar to acute infusion reactions, induction schedules and scheduled maintenance therapy were independent protective factors but concomitant immunosuppressive medication was not [66]. Most patients who develop ATI with loss of response will benefit from reducing the interval or from switching to humanized or fully human antibodies [67].
Another immunologic phenomenon associated to anti-TNF use is the formation of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) [68]. More than 50% of patients develop ANA and 25% anti-dsDNA. Development of autoimmunity does not seem to have clinical consequences as drug-induced lupus rarely occurs and has never been associated with major organ damage. These complications usually abate following withdrawal of infliximab. No routine screening for ANA should be undertaken in patients treated with infliximab nor is the development of ANAs a reason to discontinue the therapy. The formation of ANA occurs more often in females and is associated with development of papulosquamous or butterfly rash. In the adult follow-up study of Fidder with 734 IBD patients, two patients developed arthritis and a butterfly facial erythema in the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies consistent with drug-induced lupus erythematosus, in both instances after four infusions. One patient developed Coombs negative autoimmune hemolytic anemia 6 months after a single administration of infliximab for which corticosteroids were given. Another patient developed sensory loss in the lower left extremity. MRI examination of the spinal cord showed a hyperintense lesion at the level of the cone compatible with demyelinization. Infliximab treatment was discontinued after four infusions and the symptoms and radiographic lesions resolved. A 33-year-old patient was diagnosed with an optic neuritis after the second infusion which resolved with discontinuation of treatment [66].
Infections
There is an increased risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis (TB) associated with therapy with anti-TNF, the reason for this being that the human immune system needs TNF to kill intracellular pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis [69]. The median time from the first infliximab infusion to the onset of symptoms in most reported patients was 123 days. Since the initial reports, educational programs have resulted in a gradual decrease in the reporting rate of TB. However, the incidence of TB appeared to be already higher in IBD patients than in the general population due to corticosteroid use. All patients who will undergo treatment with an anti-TNF agent should now be screened for latent TB. Recommendation for TB screening and treatment are proposed nationally. In patients with signs of earlier TB exposure, prophylactic treatment with INH during the first 6–12 months of infliximab treatment is warranted.
Data on the risk of infections in pediatric IBD patients come from the REACH study. An 8-week drug interval seemed more efficacious as maintenance treatment than a 12-week interval and the infections rate was also clearly correlated: 73% overall infections in the q8 week arm vs. 38% in the q12 week arm [37]. Three children developed pneumonia in the q8 and one child in the q12 week arm, and five patients developed an abscess (four in the q8 week maintenance arm). In only 5% of patients in the q8 week arm the infections were considered severe (colitis, pneumonia and furunculosis, adenitis and abscess with MRSA) vs. 8% in the q12 week arm (abscess, abdominal pain, fever and vomiting, worsening CD and enterocolitis). Two patients developed herpes zoster in the q8 maintenance arm. Until now, there are no reports of life-threatening opportunistic infections in the pediatric IBD population, but databases for long-term pediatric follow-up are still ongoing. An industry sponsored joint US–European registry of 5,000 pediatric IBD patients intends a 20-year follow-up for safety monitoring. Data on opportunistic infections in pediatric patients treated with biologicals for joint pathology are rare [69].
More data are available for opportunistic infections in adults. In the North-American large TREAT (Therapy, Resource, Evaluation and Assessment Tool) registry, a registry reporting on long-term safety in 6,290 adult IBD patients under immunosuppressive therapy and infliximab, the unadjusted analysis showed an increased risk for infection with infliximab use, but multivariate logistic regression revealed that infliximab was not an independent predictor of serious infections [70]. Instead, the factors which were independently associated with serious infections included prednisone use (OR 2.21), the use of narcotic analgesics (OR 2.38), and moderate-to-severe disease activity (OR 2.11). But in the TREAT registry, selected patients were included and withdrawn at the discretion of the participating clinicians. In a study of 100 IBD patients with opportunistic infections and matched controlled noninfectious IBD cases, the most frequently occurring infectious agents were Herpes zoster (n = 28), Candida albicans (n = 26), Herpes simplex (n = 18), Cytomegalovirus (n = 12), and Epstein–Barr virus (n = 8). In univariate analysis, use of corticosteroids, azathioprine/6-MP, and infliximab were associated individually with significantly increased odds for opportunistic infection. Multivariate analysis indicated that use of any one of these drugs yielded an OR of 2.9, whereas use of two or three of these drugs yielded an OR of 14.5 for opportunistic infection. The authors added >50 years of age as a significant contributor [71]. Australia and New Zealand published in 2010 their experience of serious infections in 5,562 IBD patients from 1999 to 2009. Of these, 489 (16.8%) CD and 137 (5.2%) UC patients received anti-TNF-α therapy. Severe infections were uncommon (2.2%) and half of them were seen in patients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy for less than 6 months (two cases of primary Varicella zoster, two cases of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, two cases of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, and one severe flu-like illness) and six of these seven patients were taking additional immunosuppressive medications. The infections that occurred after 6 months were mostly bacterial infections (five of the seven cases). As to these results, VZV vaccination prior to immunosuppressive therapy should be considered in VZV-naïve patients [72].
No increase in infections was seen in 734 infliximab-treated IBD patients compared with IBD controls in a very recent single center long-term follow-up (a 14-year period) study of Fidder. Patients and controls were followed up for serious adverse events for a median time of 58 months and 144 months, respectively. There was no difference between the two groups in infection rate. Concomitant treatment with steroids was the only independent risk factor for infections in patients treated with infliximab [66].
Taken together, in patients treated with infliximab caution towards occurrence of infections is needed, especially when patients are also on concomitant corticosteroids and/or immunomodulators. Therefore, corticosteroids should be tapered and stopped as quickly as possible, and azathioprine or 6-MP can also be stopped safely after an initial period of 6 months, when maintenance therapy with infliximab is continued [73].
Vaccination
In children with secondary immunodeficiency, the ability to develop an adequate immunological response appears to depend on the presence of immunosuppression during or within 2 weeks after immunization. The immune response to inactivated vaccines may be attenuated in these circumstances. After discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy, an adequate immune response occurs between 3 months and 1 year.
In pediatric patients with IBD who are not on immunomodulators, a serological conversion rate of 33–85% to influenza vaccine has been reported. Patients on concomitant infliximab and immunomodulators are at higher risk of an inadequate response to vaccination. Serological testing to confirm a response should be considered if there is concern. Inactivated influenza vaccine is best given yearly to immunosuppressed children of 6 months of age and older, before each influenza season. The influenza vaccine is safe and does not affect disease activity. Reactivation of hepatitis B after infliximab administration has been reported, which is why vaccination is recommended in case the child needs treatment with biological therapy. The reason for recommending vaccination against human papilloma virus is because there appears to be an increased risk of cervical dysplasia on immunosuppression. The use of live-virus vaccines in pediatric patients receiving biological therapy in contraindicated [74].