Feeds and growth

Chapter 9. Feeds and growth



It is now clear that nutrition and growth, both as a fetus and in the early weeks of postnatal life, may have major implications on long-term health. The concept of programming suggests that cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease as well as insulin resistance and diabetes may have an early origin in some individuals and there is a small amount of evidence to suggest that premature infants may be more vulnerable to this early programming than are other, more mature infants. Infants who are born small for gestational age are at risk of developing later risk factors for cardiovascular disease, such as high blood pressure. Promotion of postnatal growth was thought to ameliorate these effects, but there is now evidence in human infants and other animals born prematurely that promotion of growth by increased postnatal nutrition increases later cardiovascular risk. It would therefore seem crucial that while preterm and small for gestation age infants should be fed appropriately, they should not be ‘over fed’ in the neonatal period. 2

Once enteral feeding has been established, the most common problem seen on a day-to-day basis is gastro-oesophageal reflux. A recent paper documented that 25% of all extremely low birth weight (<1 kg) infants are discharged home from the neonatal unit on treatment for reflux. 3 The diagnosis and management of reflux remains a subject of considerable debate with a relative lack of strong consistent evidence.

This chapter aims to cover the common problems described above as well as other topics such as nutritional supplementation.


QUESTION 1





i) A baby is reviewed in clinic and his mother describes episodes of vomiting post feeds and says that he seems uncomfortable. She has tried positioning the baby after feeds but feels this has not made any difference. A friend has said that her baby has gastro-oesophageal reflux and she has been extensively reviewing this subject on the internet. She would like you to discuss the pros and cons of the following investigations for GOR.


a. pH probe


b. Oesophageal manometry


c. Oesophageal impedance


d. Fluoroscopy


e. Endoscopy


f. Chiropractice


g. Empiric therapy.


ii) Mother elects to have empiric treatment. Which of the following treatments would you suggest?


a. Cisapride


b. Gaviscon


c. Gripe water


d. Antacids


e. Thickeners


f. Hydrolysed formula milk


g. Erythromycin


h. Ranitidine


i. Metoclopramide


j. Omeprazole


k. Domperidone


l. Buscopan (hyoscine butylbromide)


m. Coleif


n. Infacol.


QUESTION 2


Match the following milks and ingredients/uses
















Infatrini Milk protein, soy and lactose free
Nutramigen Gluten free
Neocate Gluten, sucrose and lactose free
Infasoy Disaccharide/whole protein intolerance with medium-chain triglycerides
Peptijunior Lactose intolerance, galactosaemia



QUESTION 4


Which of the following are risk factors for NEC?


i) Early feeds


ii) Indomethacin


iii) Blood transfusion


iv) Fortified feeds


v) Thickened feeds


vi) H2 receptor antagonists.



QUESTION 6


You have admitted a baby to the neonatal unit who is 30 weeks gestation. The baby requires no respiratory support and her blood glucose is stable. The mother wants to breast feed and the practice on your unit is to give bolus feeds.

The mother wants to know why the baby cannot be fed continuously as she has heard about necrotising enterocolitis and is worried her baby may develop it if the baby is fed by bolus feeds. What do you tell her?


QUESTION 7


You review a 4-month-old baby in clinic who you have been treating for reflux with thickened feeds and erythromycin. The mother has been researching on the internet and thinks her child may actually be allergic to cows’ milk but then talks about protein intolerance.


i) Is this a plausible explanation for the symptoms?


ii) How do you explain the difference between CMA and CMPI?


iii) What is the prognosis for both conditions?

The mother wants her baby tested for cows’ milk allergy.


iv) What investigations do you carry out?

She wants to try soy milk as alternative milk. She has heard that it is good for the regurgitation and crying that her baby suffers with.


v) What do you tell her?


vi) Do you alter your treatment of the baby? If so, what do you do?



ANSWER 1





i)


a. pH probe study. This is a simple bedside test that gives reproducible data. Oesophagitis may be predictable and comparative data may be produced. However acid reflux only will be detected and there is evidence that up to 90% of GOR is due to milk or gas and is not acid. Normal values have only been established for term infants and cannot be applied to preterm infants. Furthermore the upper limit of acceptable reflux index (12%) is substantially higher than that regarded as acceptable in adults or older children (6%). Studies have shown poor correlation between pH probe reflux and symptoms. Infants should not be receiving antacids, H2 antagonists or proton pump inhibitors.


b. Oesophageal manometry. Allows assessment of motility and an understanding of the pathophysiology of GOR and of sphincter function. This tends to be used only in specialist centres as both operation and evaluation of results are complex. There is no role for this method in normal practice.


c. Oesophageal impedance. Allows detection of acid and non-acid events with an immediate result (in comparison to the delay with pH probe). Normal values are not available in either preterm or term infants and analysis is time consuming. As with pH probes there is poor correlation between episodes of reflux and symptoms. The predictive value for different treatments is not established.


d. Fluoroscopy. Allows visualisation of sucking and swallowing activity, structural anatomy and brief episodes of reflux. Studies are of short duration and episodes of reflux may be seen in normal and asymptomatic infants. It should not be used to evaluate the severity of reflux but has a role in the exclusion of other problems that may mimic reflux.


e. Endoscopy. Permits visualisation of areas of oesophagitis and biopsy if necessary. Requires considerable expertise particularly if biopsy is considered and especially in a preterm baby. An infant will require heavy sedation or anaesthesia.


f. Chiropractice. This has been recommended by several groups although evidence is lacking to support this therapy in this condition.


g. Empiric treatment. The commonest means of assessment. Not associated with the risk of other investigations but does carry a risk as does use of any medication. Effect is difficult to evaluate as a large placebo effect is associated with use of any medication in a condition associated with parental anxiety. Appropriate doses and associated risks are not clearly defined.


ii) There is a lack of evidence of efficacy and safety for all medications and none can be recommended routinely in the absence of evidence to suggest that GOR is the cause of symptoms. As several studies have failed to demonstrate such an association an argument could be made that none of these agents are appropriate. There are, however, specific considerations with some of these agents.


a. Cisapride. Prokinetic agent without central anti-dopamine effects which directly stimulate the myenteric plexus. In infants born under 36 weeks gestation, cisapride should not be used for up to 3 months, due to the risk of Q–T interval prolongation in this age group.


b. Gaviscon. A compound alginate preparation that forms a raft that floats on the surface of the stomach contents to reduce reflux. Contains sodium and magnesium alginate. Half sachet=1 dose=1 mmol Na.


c. Gripe water. A variety of products are marketed as ‘gripe water’ and all contain different ingredients – ginger, fennel, essential oils, peppermint, chamomile, caraway, aloe, lemon balm and activated charcoal just to name a few. All claim to bring immediate relief and many claim to be recommended by health care professionals. Supportive evidence is missing.


d. Antacids. Should not be used due to complications such as constipation (calcium- and aluminium-containing antacids), diarrhoea (magnesium-containing antacids), and metabolic bone disease (aluminium-containing antacids which bind to phosphate).


e. Thickeners. The number of reflux episodes may be decreased in term infants by adding a thickener to the milk to increase viscosity. In preterm babies or babies who are sick, thickened milk may lead to difficulties with sucking or swallowing. In these cases, simply increasing the concentration of the feed slightly may lead to less gastric distension, which in turn would decrease the likelihood of reflux, while maintaining calorie intake.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 11, 2016 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Feeds and growth

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access