Developmental surveillance and assessment

2.2 Developmental surveillance and assessment




Introduction




Parents know their own children best


Child development starts with a good history. Parents are often remarkably accurate at recalling recent developmental achievements and changes, but more distant events may require prior notice so that sources such as relatives and baby books can be reviewed. A simple questionnaire filled in before the interview can allow parents to consider these details in the waiting room or at home. Parents should be asked open-ended questions



about their child’s progress, such as ‘Tell me how she is getting around’, as they are more likely to elicit revealing answers than ‘Is she walking now?’. This process is time-consuming and parents need to feel relaxed and unhurried if they are to give their best information. Some of the information may well be sensitive, especially when there are problems, and a private setting without interruptions is important. Developmental interactions are best scheduled for a well-child visit or review to avoid confusing illness behaviour with developmental delay.



image Clinical example


Sinclair, a 3-year-old child of English-speaking parents, had a vocabulary of only 20 words. His medical history was normal. The parents were reassured by his normal hearing assessment, as well as by the father’s own history of initial poor speech development as a child. However, the preschool staff became concerned about the degree of his language difficulty and whether it was part of a global developmental delay. The words he knew were used singly, were clearly articulated and were used in their appropriate context, but, to indicate his needs, he resorted to leading an adult by the hand. No phrases or small sentences were heard. He understood two-step commands and used facial expressions, hand gesturing and eye-to-eye contact appropriately. At preschool, he was interested in the other children, but they often excluded him in play when he couldn’t talk properly. He showed examples of imaginative, constructive and cooperative motor play. There were no behavioural concerns and he was an affectionate child.


Assessment with the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales showed that his abilities tested within the average range for his age, other than a mild delay in speech and language skills. During the assessment, he was cooperative and persevered with the tasks at hand. Sinclair therefore had an isolated expressive language disorder of presumed familial origin, and was referred to a speech pathologist for assessment, therapy and liaison with the preschool teacher to modify his preschool curriculum.




Checking the normal (surveillance)



What are the normal ranges?


The key is to look for areas of development delayed beyond the normal range and not to compare the child with ‘normal milestones’, which are merely the average age of achievement. By definition, half of the population will not meet median milestones, and their use can worry parents unnecessarily (‘milestones are millstones’). It is preferable to use the normal ranges in Table 2.2.2. Many developmental patterns are familial, but so are many developmental disorders, so it is unwise to accept delay as a normal variation. Just because an uncle did not talk until he was 4 years old does not mean he did not also have a developmental language disorder or deafness. Other ‘causes’ such as being a twin, bilingualism or tongue-tie can produce minor variations, but not significant delays needing more formal diagnostic assessment. Assuming that the child’s delay is caused by these minor variations is a common source of late diagnosis and delayed effective intervention. The most important conclusion that needs to be drawn from this surveillance is that there are no warning signs of a potential problem (Table 2.2.3). Should doubt exist, it is always better to seek a second opinion and to arrange some therapy or intervention than to provide false reassurance. It may make you feel better to reassure, but families who waste months finding help for their child will often feel let down.





Any interaction is an opportunity to examine


As each area is reviewed through the different stages of childhood, any apparent delays or unusual features can be clarified with the family. This allows the developmental examination to be targeted. Although many children are shy and perhaps fearful, a quiet and patient approach will often bring out the show-off in children, especially for tasks about which they are confident. For this reason it is best to start looking at non-verbal areas (blocks, puzzles, drawing, etc.) and having appropriate furniture at the child’s height will enable you to get down to the child’s eye level. Simple equipment (Table 2.2.4) can be used to elicit a range of skills and the session should remain a play activity. Remember that too much direct eye contact, especially from above, can be threatening, and a relaxed tangential approach across the child may be more successful. Refusal to cooperate is a regular occurrence and it is better to reschedule than to persist and teach the child the sessions are going to be unpleasant.


Table 2.2.4 Developmental equipment


















































Area Equipment Activity
Gross motor Steps Crawling and walking up and down
Tennis ball Throwing, kicking and catching
Tricycle Riding and pedalling
Fine motor Raisins Pincer grasp and feeding
Small blocks Building, colour matching and counting
Inset puzzles Matching and sorting shapes
Crayon Scribbling, drawing lines and shapes
Paper (with child scissors) For above plus cutting and folding
Language Doll Identifying and naming body parts
Simple picture book Pointing to items and describing the action
Toy telephone or dictaphone Encouraging speech samples
Social and daily living skills Mirror Watching baby’s response to self
Toy cup, plate and cutlery Feeding the doll and pretend tea party

The aim of the medical examination (see Chapter 2.1) is to detect any condition that might be causing the developmental delay, or indeed any general medical problem that may be exacerbating it. You should note the child’s growth parameters, especially head circumference, and any signs of dysmorphism or neurocutaneous disorders. Although a thorough physical examination is desirable, particular attention needs to be paid to the neurological system, looking for signs of cerebral palsy and other neuromotor disorders (see Chapter 17.2). Some ingenuity may be needed after a long developmental session to re-engage the child in play.


Vision and hearing are vital for children’s learning. For intervention to be as effective as possible, these senses need to be sharp. It may therefore be of more service to the child to arrange an opinion from a vision or hearing professional than to perform a rough screening test, which can miss minor problems that are easily remediable. Again, avoid false reassurance at all costs.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 4, 2016 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Developmental surveillance and assessment

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access