Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis

 

Osteosarcomas (n = 157)

No.

%

Age at diagnosis (years)

 Median

13.3

 Range

(0–44)

Sex

 Female

68

43.3

 Male

89

56.7

Location

 Proximal femur

9

5.7

 Distal femur

79

50.3

 Proximal tibia

39

24.8

 Distal tibia

11

7

 Proximal fibula

5

3.2

 Proximal humerus

11

7

 Distal humerus

2

1.3

 Distal radio

1

0.6

Necrosis

 Good (>90 %)

59

37.6

 Poor (<90 %)

86

54.8

 Not available

12

7.6

Histologic subtype

 Osteoblastic

132

84.1

 Chondroblastic

16

10.2

 Fibroblastic

3

1.9

 Telangiectasic

6

3.8

Metastasis at diagnosis

 No

105

66.9

 Yes

52

33.1

Status

 Alive

101

64.3

 Dead

48

30.6

 Not available

8

5.1

Follow-up (months)

 Mean

102

 Median

69.5

 Range

(2.6–363.7)





8.3 Results


The tumor crossed the physis in 56 % (89/157) of patients. Comparison of patients in whom tumors crossed the physis and patients in whom tumors did not revealed statistically significant differences in age, time from initial symptoms to start of treatment, presence of metastases at diagnosis and outcome (Table 8.2).


Table 8.2
Differences between patients grouped according to whether the tumor crossed the physis or not. (Contingency tables)

































 
Physis crossed (%)

Physis not crossed (%)
 

Number

89 (56 %)

68 (44 %)
 

Mean age

13.4

11.9

p = 0.05

Diagnostic delaya

4 months

2 months

p < 0.0001

Metastasis at diagnosis

37 (42 %)

15 (22 %)

p = 0.04

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 17, 2016 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access