Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis

 

Osteosarcomas (n = 157)
No.
%
Age at diagnosis (years)
 Median
13.3
 Range
(0–44)
Sex
 Female
68
43.3
 Male
89
56.7
Location
 Proximal femur
9
5.7
 Distal femur
79
50.3
 Proximal tibia
39
24.8
 Distal tibia
11
7
 Proximal fibula
5
3.2
 Proximal humerus
11
7
 Distal humerus
2
1.3
 Distal radio
1
0.6
Necrosis
 Good (>90 %)
59
37.6
 Poor (<90 %)
86
54.8
 Not available
12
7.6
Histologic subtype
 Osteoblastic
132
84.1
 Chondroblastic
16
10.2
 Fibroblastic
3
1.9
 Telangiectasic
6
3.8
Metastasis at diagnosis
 No
105
66.9
 Yes
52
33.1
Status
 Alive
101
64.3
 Dead
48
30.6
 Not available
8
5.1
Follow-up (months)
 Mean
102
 Median
69.5
 Range
(2.6–363.7)

8.3 Results

The tumor crossed the physis in 56 % (89/157) of patients. Comparison of patients in whom tumors crossed the physis and patients in whom tumors did not revealed statistically significant differences in age, time from initial symptoms to start of treatment, presence of metastases at diagnosis and outcome (Table 8.2).
Table 8.2
Differences between patients grouped according to whether the tumor crossed the physis or not. (Contingency tables)
 
Physis crossed (%)
Physis not crossed (%)
 
Number
89 (56 %)
68 (44 %)
 
Mean age
13.4
11.9
p = 0.05
Diagnostic delaya
4 months
2 months
p < 0.0001
Metastasis at diagnosis
37 (42 %)
15 (22 %)
p = 0.04

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 17, 2016 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access