Clinical Nutrition



Fig. 6.1
Summary of clinical nutrition management in pediatric digestive diseases. PN parenteral nutrition, * paralytic or mechanical ileus, ° obstruction, NEC necrotizing enterocolitis, EN enteral nutrition, ONS oral nutritional supplements





6.2 Clinical Nutrition and SBS


Nutritional management of SBS is of particular interest because it provides a model of combined PN/EN management. This model may be applied to several digestive diseases at neonatal onset. Following neonatal small bowel resection, IF occurs due to the residual reduced length of the gut, responsible for SBS. The course of IF SBS related can be ideally subdivided into three phases, with distinct clinical characteristics and requiring different nutritional approaches. If long-term dependence on PN is expected (generally more than 3 months), IF can be defined as chronic, and it requires to plan home parenteral nutrition (HPN) programs (see Figs. 6.2 and 6.3) [13, 14].

A333489_1_En_6_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 6.2
Course of IF after neonatal small bowel resection. IF intestinal failure, PN parenteral nutrition, EN enteral nutrition, ON oral nutrition, IFALD intestinal failure-associated liver disease, HPN home parenteral nutrition


A333489_1_En_6_Fig3_HTML.gif


Fig. 6.3
Patterns of combined management of PN and EN after small bowel resection. PN parenteral nutrition, EN enteral nutrition. (a) Pattern of EN beginning. (b) Pattern of tolerance to advancing EN. (c) Pattern of intolerance to advancing EN. BF breastfeeding, HFs hydrolyzed formulas, ON oral nutrition, AAs amino acid-based formulas, HPN home parenteral nutrition

Overall the nutritional care of neonatal SBS onset includes (1) early managing of fluid and electrolyte losses before starting PN and EN; (2) providing adequate PN, for growth and normal development; (3) promoting intestinal rehabilitation by optimizing EN; (4) discharging on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) the patients with protracted dependence on PN; and (5) preventing/treating complications related to the patients’ underlying disease and their PN.


6.2.1 Early Managing of Fluid and Electrolyte Losses


SBS patients, at the early stages after bowel resection, have increased losses of fluids and electrolytes which can lead to significant electrolyte imbalance and dehydration. Early restoration of fluid and electrolyte homeostasis is therefore required, and it needs aggressive recovery with fluids [15]. Early fluid replacement is usually 1 mL for every mL of fluid loss. This phase is followed by PN beginning.


6.2.2 Providing Adequate PN


Before approaching each PN program, a reliable vascular access should be warranted. The choice of the access is dependent on the predicted length of the PN support. Peripherally inserted central lines are very effective means of providing PN over a short to medium term, while more definitive central venous access is required for prolonged PN. The expertise of a dedicated hospital-based nutritional team is required to tailor PN to the single patient and to manage central catheters; it is supported by official guidelines published by the pertinent societies [1517].

SBS is at risk for developing intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) [18] due to IF-related factors, such as lack of enteral feeding, disturbed enterohepatic bile flow, presence of inflammation, oxidative stress, immaturity of the liver, and infections, but also PN-related factors [18]. Therefore, in patients who are predicted to require long-term treatments, PN should be tailored to reduce the risk of liver injury [9, 19]. To prevent/treat IFALD, some aspects of PN management can be modulated and in particular are the following:


  1. A.


    Choosing lipid emulsions (LEs)

     

  2. B.


    Optimizing non-lipid intake

     


6.2.2.1 Choosing LEs


Historically, a French study delineated IFALD in adult HPN patients as a value of at least 1.5-fold the upper limit of normal on two of three liver function measures for cholestasis that persists for more than 6 months [20]. This study also showed that chronic cholestasis predicts serious liver problems and is associated with the use of soybean oil-based lipids (SO) at doses >1 g/kg/day [20]. Several factors may explicate how LEs can impact on the development of IFALD:


  1. (a)


    Activation of hepatic macrophages (Kupffer cells) by excess of ω–6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in SO that leads to the production of proinflammatory cytokines derived from linoleic and arachidonic acids [21].

     

  2. (b)


    High intake of phytosterols (e.g., stigmasterol and campesterol, equivalents of cholesterol in vegetable oils) derived from SO; they have structural similarity to bile acids and may act as antagonists to nuclear bile receptors that are protective against cholestasis [21].

     

  3. (c)


    Overall content of vitamin E, especially of its most bioactive isoform α-tocopherol, which protects PUFAs from oxidative damage due to lipid peroxidation. The addition of this component to SO has been shown to reduce liver damage in a piglet model of IFALD [21].

     

Published surveys report that the use of a fish oil-based LEs (FO) is able to reverse IFALD [22, 23]. These surveys, nevertheless, are used at a markedly decreased dosage of FO (1 g/kg/d) if compared to that of SO in the control historic group (3 g/kg/day) [22]. That supports the hypothesis that the overall decreased fat intake rather than FO supplementation is important in reversing IFALD [21]. Interestingly a recently published paper reports two cases of reverted cholestasis by switching from SMOF lipid (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany), an emulsion containing a mixture of 30 % of SO, 30 % of coconut oil, 25 % of olive oil, and 15 % of FO at 2.0–3.0 g/kg/day, to FO at 1 g/kg/day [24]. That supports the hypothesis that the reduced amount rather than the type of LEs may be hepatotoxic.

Anyway FO monotherapy has now been widely employed in clinical practice. FO alone may not be able to provide enough energy to sustain growth. A mixed LE containing soybean oil (SMOFlipid) compared with SO in a blinded randomized controlled trial in pediatric HPN patients resulted in mild changes in total bilirubin when administered four to five times per week at 2 g/kg/day and in normal growth pattern [25].

In North America, FO alone (Omegaven, Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) is available on the market, whereas in Europe, it is possible to use LEs containing the mixture (SMOFlipid, Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany). That led to develop two different approaches to optimize LE use in the United States and Canada as compared with Europe.

Many institutions generally combine the use of novel lipid preparations and reduced rates of administration of SO to prevent the development of liver disease [21]; e.g., if bilirubin exceeds 34 μg/L, lipid intake is reduced at 1 g/k/day, while if it goes over 50 μg/L, the lipid source is changed to FO alone at 1 g/kg/day.

Table 6.1 summarizes the composition of available LEs employed in PN.


Table 6.1
Composition of lipid emulsions available for parenteral nutrition




















































Emulsion (% fat) (manufacturer)

Lipid source (%)

ω6:ω3 ratio

Phytosterols (mg/L)

α-Tocopherol (μmol/L)

Intralipid 20 % (Fresenius Kabi)

SO 100 %

7:1

348 ± 33

87

Lipofundin 20 % (B. Braun)

SO 50 %

MCT 50 %

7:1

No data

502

ClinOleic-Clinolipid 20 % (Baxter)

SO 20 %

OO 100 %

9:1

327 ± 8

75

Lipoplus 20 % (B. Braun)

SO 40 %

MCT 50 %

FO 10 %

2.7:1

No data

562

SMOF lipid 20 % (Fresenius Kabi)

SO 30 %

MCT 30 %

OO 25 %

FO 15 %

2.5:1

47.6

500

Omegaven 10 % (Fresenius Kabi)

FO 100 %

1:8

0

505


SO soybean oil, MCT medium-chain triglycerides, OO olive oil, FO fish oil


6.2.2.2 Optimizing Non-lipid Intake


Excessive glucose intake causes increased lipogenesis and fat tissue deposition together with subsequent liver steatosis and enhanced production of triglycerides by the liver [3]. The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) [26], the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition [18], and the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines (ESPGHAN) [27] recommend limiting the glucose infusion rate (GIR) at 12–14 mg/kg/min (18 g/kg per day) in infants and young children up to 2 years. Glucose intake should usually cover 60–75 % of nonprotein calories [3]. As reported above reduced LEs intake as strategy to prevent/treat IFALD may be required; in such cases increased glucose intake, to better satisfy the nutritional needs, resulted as well tolerated [28].

Furthermore, prophylactic cycling of PN may reduce the incidence of IFALD [21]. Cyclical PN is well tolerated and may be 3–6 months of age. In cyclical PN the maximal rate of glucose infusion may exceed the advised GIR. The maximal infusion rate should not exceed 1.2 g/kg per hour (20 mg/kg per min). A stepwise increase and decrease of glucose infusion rate at onset and at discontinuation of the infusion should be considered to avoid hyper- and hypoglycemia, respectively. A reliable method for tapering is to halve the rate for 30 minutes and then to halve this again for an additional 30 minutes. Glucose tolerance should be monitored during the first phases of the cycling PN [3].

With regard to the choice of amino acid solution, there is evidence that supplementation of TrophAmine may reduce the incidence of IFALD in certain high-risk populations such as those with NEC [19].

Furthermore, copper and manganese serum levels from PN solutions should be monitored closely in patients who have developed IFALD because they may exacerbate it [19].


6.2.3 Promoting EN


The provision of enteral nutrients is a critical component of the therapy of IF; in SBS patients it represents the fundamental driver of adaptation [15]. Early attempts of oral nutrition confer the critical window of opportunity for establishing normal suck and swallow patterns; if this is not attended, the child is at risk for oral aversion, which has many long-term negative consequences [29]. The most pragmatic way to address EN handling in IF should be to account that all patients regardless of the etiology of their IF may recover to a variable degree and that the strategies to promote EN should be reconsidered on a day-to-day basis. The overall care of IF is based on the judicious integration of two overlapped goals: progressive advancement of enteral calories and gradual weaning from the ongoing support of PN, maintaining a weight gain [15]. If tube feeding is used, the practice of inserting a gastrostomy early allows a more controlled method of delivering feed with an opportunity to preserve and promote voluntary feeding without the negative effects of the long-term presence of a nasal tube [29]. If patients with motility disorders but also with SBS show poor tolerance to gastric feeding, the post-pyloric EN approach should be tried [6]. Main aspects concerning EN management in SBS are:


  1. A.


    Choosing the formula

     

  2. B.


    Assessing methods of feeding

     

  3. C.


    Assessing tolerance to EN

     

  4. D.


    Using enteral supplements

     

  5. E.


    Starting and handling complementary foods

     


6.2.3.1 Choosing the Formula


There is a paucity of evidence in favoring one type of feed over the other in this setting; however, breastfeeding (BF) should be used when tolerated as it helps and promotes adaptation [30]. The full advantages of BF include the optimal macronutrient composition for human infant growth, with a full complement of macro- and micronutrients [31, 32]. In addition, it contains trophic factors such as epidermal growth factor, which likely augment the adaptive process [7]. Furthermore, BF contains immunoglobulins and natural antimicrobial properties which both enhance mucosal barrier function and prevent dangerous overgrowth of bacteria within the intestinal lumen. Finally it promotes intestinal colonization by appropriate lactobacilli and related bacteria which are important elements of healthy microbiome [33, 34]. Bovine colostrum also seems to confer beneficial effects on IF [35].

Finally BF supports physiological and psychological relationship between infant and mother. If the mother’s own milk is not available, banked breast milk, even with pasteurization, has nearly identical physiologic benefits [31]. Overall BF should be the first choice in SBS patients.

If BF is not available, formula selection should be based on:


  1. (a)


    Low allergenicity, because SBS infants are at high risk for allergy [36]

     

  2. (b)


    Fat profile based on a combination of medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs) and long-chain triglycerides (LCTs) (ratio of MCTs to LCTs of 30 %/70 %) that seems to favor fat absorption in patients with significant intestinal resection, with or without a colon in continuity [37]

     

  3. (c)


    Pre-hydrolyzed protein content that may be more suitable than the whole proteins to give nitrogen source to an inefficient mucosal surface [32]

     

  4. (d)


    Low osmolality (less than 310 mOsm/L) to minimize the risk for osmotic diarrhea [38, 39] ]

     

  5. (e)


    Glucose polymer as main carbohydrate source rather than lactose, due to the possible lactose intolerance, especially in SBS children [16]

     

Some HFs and AAs meet the above reported criteria. AAs have been shown effective in decreasing PN length in small and uncontrolled series of SBS patients [18, 40].


6.2.3.2 Methods of Feeding


EN should be started as soon as postoperative ileus resolves [16, 41, 42], by the most physiological mode. This ideally should be in the form of oral bolus feeding via the breast or bottle. In infants unable to tolerate oral feeds, nasogastric tube feeding is needed. Continuous tube feeding is associated with increased feed tolerance by improved mucosal contact and decreased transit time within the gut [16]. Bolus tube feeding helps gut motility and adaptation and provides periods of fasting, thus reducing persistent hyperinsulinemia. After establishing an appropriate base of enteral nutrients, the general pattern is to increase the provision of enteral nutrients by a slow but steady increment, beginning at 10–20 mL/kg/day (for the average newborn). After the infant can tolerate continuous feeds of 5 mL/h, it is extremely useful to begin transition to oral feeds, providing in small quantities, three to four bolus oral feedings a day (equal or less than the volume continuously tolerated per hour). After establishing a stable feeding pattern, feeds are steadily increased on a daily basis [16]. In order to maximize overall enteral intake, it is often helpful to have continuous drips overnight. To correctly switch from PN to EN, it needs to consider that the net caloric extraction from EN is not 100 % as from PN and that macronutrient absorption from EN is superior than that of electrolytes and fluids. Therefore, PN should be decreased according to the calories provided by EN and not volume for volume [41].


6.2.3.3 Assessing Tolerance to EN


In SBS infants, increasing stool output, vomiting, and irritability to the advancing EN may suggest poor tolerance to the current EN regimen. If stool output is between 30 and 40 mL/kg body weight, it needs to carefully increase EN. Doubled stool output or outputs >40 mL/kg/day are contraindications to increase enteral feeds and indications to deal with a short-term reduction in feeding volume that will be gradually reintroduced. Stool frequency greater than six times per day should induce to cautiously increase EN [16].

Carbohydrate intolerance, which determines frequent and liquid stools, is frequent in SBS patients, and it can be suggested by the presence of reducing substances on the stools and by the stool pH <6.

The rise in plasma citrulline concentration frequently accompanies the successful achieving of enteral tolerance. Citrulline is a nonessential amino acid produced by the enterocytes of the small bowel; its serum level has been shown to reflect intestinal mass in various gastrointestinal diseases. Citrulline concentration of 12–15 μmol/L or greater following EN beginning seems to predict a successful PN withdrawal [41]. In Table 6.2 we report the markers of impaired EN tolerance useful in clinical practice. The combinations of several markers are associated with evolution toward chronic IF.
Jul 18, 2017 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Clinical Nutrition

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access