Fig. 17.1
Fear-avoidance model of vaginismus (FAM-V) (Used with permission of Guilford Press from ter Kuile and Reissing [28])
17.6 Specific Diagnostic Aspects
17.6.1 History Taking
The diagnosis is made on the basis of the anamnesis. Questioning related to the problem goes through various steps (Table 17.1). The clinical presentation of and the request for help made by women with vaginismus are very diverse: she can be young (around 20 years of age) or somewhat older (around 30 years old); she may be able to function sexually very well without intercourse or on the other hand avoid every sexual situation; she may not be able to insert anything into her vagina, or be able to insert tampons or allow a speculum examination, while insertion of the penis is impossible; and finally she may wish to improve her sexual functioning or she may wish to become pregnant in “a natural way.”
Table 17.1
Anamnesis questions
What can and what cannot be inserted into the vagina? |
Can the woman insert a tampon or 1 or 2 of her own fingers or of her partner’s fingers or penis? |
Does the woman have any experience with gynecological examination, in particular a speculum examination? If so: was this possible? |
Has it always been this way or has this come about over time? |
Vulvar pain |
Is there vulvar pain when inserting a tampon or 1 or 2 of her own fingers or of her partner’s fingers or his penis? |
What is the nature of the pain? |
What is the course of the pain? |
Is there also vulvar pain when urinating after (attempted) intercourse? |
Does vulvar pain exist not associated with sexual activity? |
What is, according to the woman, the cause of the inability to have intercourse: the pain? It does not fit? |
What are the consequences of the problem in the sexual situation? |
Does the woman recognize that she is more tense/more anxious in general and specifically in the pelvic floor area? Does she anticipate the pain by becoming more tensed? |
Does the woman recognize that she is less sexually excited during lovemaking, particularly less moist/lubricated? |
Does the woman recognize that she has gradually less or no desire in sexual contact, intercourse? Does she avoid every (sexual) contact? |
Are there other pelvic floor hypertonic symptoms, such as frequent urination and/or constipation? |
Are there other gynecological complaints such as excessive vaginal discharge? |
Does the woman have negative/traumatic sexual experiences? |
What are the consequences of the problem for the woman herself in the psychological sense, such as experiencing shame and having a feeling of guilt toward the partner? |
What is the impact of the problem for the relationship with her partner, such as tensions in the relationship? Why is (are) the woman (and her partner) seeking help now? To improve the sexual relationship and function better or a child wish? |
Moreover, it is not always easy through the anamnesis to distinguish between “vaginismus” and “dyspareunia.” In both groups, there can be vulvar pain when the penis is inserted or attempts at insertion of the penis are made. When intercourse has never been successful, the woman is diagnosed with “lifelong vaginismus.” When intercourse has been possible but became painful at the start or over the course of time and eventually is no longer possible, this is acquired “secondary” vaginismus.
Case History: Continued
Jane Periwinkle, like most other woman with lifelong vaginismus, has never been able to insert a finger or tampon into her vagina or have a pelvic exam with finger or speculum insertion. Jane initially indicates that she desired nothing more than being able to experience intercourse, but her inability to insert a tampon led her to believe that her vagina could not possibly accommodate a penis. She and her partner are very anxious that “physical causes” were making vaginal penetration impossible.
Jane’s partner colludes with her in avoiding intercourse. He has observed her difficulties and shared her fears about physiological pathology. He cares for his partner and wants to avoid the negative emotional fallout. They have been married for 5 years but could barely remember attempts at intercourse. However, Jane and Peter do not avoid sexual intimacy with the explicit agreement that vaginal penetration will not be attempted. She reports no history of sexual abuse. This is their first attempt at formal treatment and both are very hopeful to overcome the problem in order to be able to conceive children in a natural way.
17.6.2 Physical Examination
An (external) gynecological examination is carried out on women with lifelong vaginismus to assess, on the one hand, any congenital abnormalities of the hymen or vagina and, on the other hand, to inform the woman about her genitals, about the location of the pain that she may be experiencing during an attempt at intercourse, and about what can happen when her pelvic floor muscles tighten voluntarily or involuntarily. The examination thus has an educational purpose. Patient preparation is central to an educational pelvic examination (EPE) to avoid further distress (for details about patient preparation, see also Chap. 30). To facilitate the EPE, the patient is informed of what to expect and reassured that no vaginal insertion (of a finger or speculum) will be attempted. She is invited to be an active participant (e.g., holding a mirror to observe exam, ask questions) and reminded that she can terminate the exam whenever she wishes. Instructions on coping with fear/anxiety can be very helpful (e.g., breathing techniques).
The examination consists of inspection of the external genitals, the vaginal introitus, and the hymeneal ring and palpation of the vaginal vestibule. In a large group of women (40–100 %) with lifelong vaginismus, findings as are described in the diagnosis “provoked vestibulodynia” (PVD) (see Chap. 18) can be found. In that case, the woman indicates having pain when the vaginal vestibulum is touched with a moistened cotton wool swab, the so-called “touch test” or “Q-tip test,” in which sometimes vestibular erythema is also visible. The pain is regularly recognized by the woman as the pain that she feels during (attempted) intercourse.
17.6.2.1 Evaluation of Vaginistic Response or Pelvic Floor Hypertonicity
It is logical that the woman tightens her pelvic floor muscles as a response to pain. This behavior is frequently seen on performing the Q-tip test. Sometimes a traditional or classic vaginistic response can be observed with tightening of the pelvic floor muscles, adduction of the thighs, curling of the toes/feet and lower back, and sometimes autonomous tension responses. Because intravaginal palpation is not possible or desirable, pelvic floor hypertonicity or the constant tensing of the pelvic floor muscles can be assumed when the woman has difficulties lying on the edge of the examination couch with her pelvis relaxed or remaining relaxed during the examination and palpation.
17.6.2.2 Do Not Do
Speculum examination and bimanual internal examination must be avoided. This will frequently also be impossible, or if one perseveres in doing so will be accompanied by pain and the occurrence of a vaginistic response.
Case History: Continued
Jane Periwinkle’s physical examination is limited to a visual inspection of her external genitals, and no pathology is noted. She is quite anxious in anticipation; she displays an elevated degree of pelvic reactivity during the EPE but put at ease by the process of the EPE. She reports pain on the Q-tip test at 5 and 7 o’clock. She recognizes “the pain” during the Q-tip test as the pain she has felt during the unsuccessful penetration attempts she has carried out a long time ago.
17.6.3 Discussion of Findings
After the physical examination, it is logical to discuss the findings and to explain the complaint in a way that is comprehensible for the woman and her partner. It can help to make a schematic drawing of the vulva on which the urethra, vaginal introitus, the pain spots, and location of the pelvic floor muscles can be drawn while talking. It is not possible to say what a possible cause might be, but one can explain how physical and psychological factors could influence sexual functioning and the inability to have intercourse. The FAM-V model can be useful in this context (Fig. 17.1). The FAM-V model can give the woman pointers to understand her own physical and emotional response(s) to (attempts at) penetration. She often recognizes various elements that are maintaining the vicious circle in which she is caught up.
Case History: Continued
The FAM-V model is discussed, taking into account Jane Periwinkle’s fearful cognitions “it does not fit” and her behavioral response (elevated degree of pelvic reactivity during the EPE), to explain her response to attempts at penetration. Jane and Peter recognize the various elements of the FAM-V model. And both think that the explanation that it is all “normal” will help to overcome the fearful cognition “there is something wrong.”
17.6.4 Treatment Plan
On the basis of the information obtained from the anamnesis and the physical examination, a purely medical approach is not appropriate. In the further course of the consultation, the different components of treatment can be discussed. When the wish for a child is prominent, an explanation can be given about self-insemination do-it-yourself (DIY insemination with own sperm). For women with vaginismus who wish to have intercourse, a sexological coaching session is appropriate. Clinical psychologists/sexologists, who are trained in the basic principles of exposure, are best equipped to accompany the couple during exposure treatment. There is, above all, a role for the pelvic floor physiotherapist in addition to medical and psychological expertise specifically when a woman prefers this approach.
17.7 Specific Therapeutic Aspects
17.7.1 Medical Treatment
Different forms of treatment have been used to address the somatic correlates of vaginismus, for example, surgical removal of the hymen or widening of the introitus [29], injections of botulinum toxin in the pelvic musculature [30], or application of topical anesthetic creams [31]. No evidence of the effectiveness of one of these treatments is available from controlled studies [21, 32].
17.7.2 Physical Therapy
Although physical therapy is often used in clinical practice, evidences from prospective and controlled studies is lacking [32].
17.7.3 Psychological Treatment
The widespread application of the anxiety-reduction approach of gradual exposure reflects the consensus among theoreticians and clinicians about the important role of anxiety in vaginismus [32]. Since Masters and Johnson (1970) [33], most therapies for vaginismus have used vaginal “dilatation” in which initially the woman becomes accustomed to self-touch to the vaginal introitus and insertion of her own finger or dilators through the introitus and pass way into her vagina, and then places the first of a series of inserts of gradually increasing diameter into her vagina. In reality, of course, there is no actual dilation but rather a gradual reduction of fear. According to the FAM-V model, the penetration-related fears are maintained in women with vaginismus because avoidance prevents disconfirmation of the catastrophic beliefs. By directly reducing avoidance and increasing successful penetration behaviors, fears are disconfirmed; catastrophization is reduced and eventually eliminated.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree